Definitely society as a whole. I'm not an anti-Bushtard. But this sort of thing really makes me sick. I couldn't imagine getting my body all farked up then come home to nothing. Even if that soldier was a big idiot loser with no money before he got shot up, you'd think that he'd at least be given a stipend to survive on. Or have some sort of goverment housing. To think of the cash that is made by some in the business of war, you'd think the gov't would at least slap a tax on weapons sales to pay for veteran care. No war, no sales, no new vets to take care of. Just thought of it, but seems fair to me.Is this an indictment of Bush or society as a whole as it relates to their value of servicemen? If the public TRULY cared, there would be a system in place to deal with this very issue. Its not like this is the first war ever and these are the first ever homeless vets. Yeah, it falls on Bush now cause he's in office, but lets be real, this is an issue that goes deeper.
Is that true? Even if that's true, don't you think they deserve a little support now that they've been mutiliated for "the cause"?these guys were homeless before they joined.
I dont know the extent of it, but I know that you DO in fact get disability payments and vet benefits like free healthcare, nursing home, stuff like that. And its not like disabled people arent allowed in sect.8 housing. Its a ghetto, but I fail to see how they're worse off than anyone else who is disabled. I mean, I dont see how they remain "homeless' when there are programs in place to at the very least house and feed them. There are millions who dont work and are NOT homeless and dont recieve the disability vet benefits like they do, so I guess Im a little confused as well as saddened.Definitely society as a whole. I'm not an anti-Bushtard. But this sort of thing really makes me sick. I couldn't imagine getting my body all farked up then come home to nothing. Even if that soldier was a big idiot loser with no money before he got shot up, you'd think that he'd at least be given a stipend to survive on. Or have some sort of goverment housing. To think of the cash that is made by some in the business of war, you'd think the gov't would at least slap a tax on weapons sales to pay for veteran care. No war, no sales, no new vets to take care of. Just thought of it, but seems fair to me.
Ditto. Gets to a point where you can't help people who don't want to help themselves I guess...I dont know the extent of it, but I know that you DO in fact get disability payments and vet benefits like free healthcare, nursing home, stuff like that. And its not like disabled people arent allowed in sect.8 housing. Its a ghetto, but I fail to see how they're worse off than anyone else who is disabled. I mean, I dont see how they remain "homeless' when there are programs in place to at the very least house and feed them. There are millions who dont work and are NOT homeless and dont recieve the disability vet benefits like they do, so I guess Im a little confused as well as saddened.
But the rub is that your benefits are related to you "percent disabled". The guy in the story (when I heard it on NPR on friday) was a mechanic. His arm no longer works but he's considered only 20% disabled. But he can't be a mechanic anymore. But his disability is paying him a bout $200/month.I dont know the extent of it, but I know that you DO in fact get disability payments and vet benefits like free healthcare, nursing home, stuff like that. And its not like disabled people arent allowed in sect.8 housing. Its a ghetto, but I fail to see how they're worse off than anyone else who is disabled. I mean, I dont see how they remain "homeless' when there are programs in place to at the very least house and feed them. There are millions who dont work and are NOT homeless and dont recieve the disability vet benefits like they do, so I guess Im a little confused as well as saddened.
But the rub is that your benefits are related to you "percent disabled". The guy in the story (when I heard it on NPR on friday) was a mechanic. His arm no longer works but he's considered only 20% disabled. But he can't be a mechanic anymore. But his disability is paying him a bout $200/month.
Now admittedly, this guy (after listening to him) is no rocket scientist. But he's still getting the short end of the stick.
That is true. And this guy.....again, is a bit of a moron because he is refusing help from his sister etc.....and he is living in a car that he can somehow afford to put gas in....I see what you're saying, but since when does missing an arm mean you cant get food stamps and govt. housing? He may not be able to work, but he has benefits at his disposal that either (1) he isnt taking advantage of or (2) is for some reason unable to that I dont understand. Im not ruling out #2, but it seems unlikely that a disabled war vet would not be allowed food stamps and a room.
It's giving me hell on the mac, I cant listen.If you click on the "listen" link, it will clarify what I'm talking about. I'm refering to the first guy living in the Plymouth
Well then just trust that everything I say is 100% correct.It's giving me hell on the mac, I cant listen.
I'm sure it is a combination of economic, social, and frankly, mental health issues, which are forcing some veterans to live out of their cars.I dont know the extent of it, but I know that you DO in fact get disability payments and vet benefits like free healthcare, nursing home, stuff like that. And its not like disabled people arent allowed in sect.8 housing. Its a ghetto, but I fail to see how they're worse off than anyone else who is disabled. I mean, I dont see how they remain "homeless' when there are programs in place to at the very least house and feed them. There are millions who dont work and are NOT homeless and dont recieve the disability vet benefits like they do, so I guess Im a little confused as well as saddened.