That sounded rather religiously zealous!!robdamanii said:You know why there are so many tornados and hurricanes?
BECAUSE GOD HATES REDNECKS, RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS AND TRAILER PARKS! Every year....*POOOOFF*...."get that mess off my planet".
That sounded rather religiously zealous!!robdamanii said:You know why there are so many tornados and hurricanes?
BECAUSE GOD HATES REDNECKS, RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS AND TRAILER PARKS! Every year....*POOOOFF*...."get that mess off my planet".
Did they ask dhgirlie for a quote?sirknight6 said:Has anyone noticed the name of the ex-lesbian?
Fryrear
The basic point is that you cannot blame the source for the outcome. It seems to me that the resurgence, power and continued voice of the religious right is fueled by incorrect interpretation and a failure to truly understand the Christian message. That leads to hate, fear and more misunderstanding. In my experience, too many liberals (a group I count myself in) focus their ire on religion and not the source of its misuse. Not only does this not concentrate on the true issue, but it further divides the left and right as each feels that their way of life is under attack. This is one of the reasons for the support of unconstitutional and irrational issues on the part of the right (school prayer, for example): they feel that they need to counteract the secularizing left by going the other direction. Hating on religion won't solve these problems; it makes them worse.Slugman said:Wait – a religious group is trying to brainwash people… I am shocked!
Why not? I’ve never heard of a Buddhist, Sikh, or Atheist group running one of these camps.
YUP! Religious Right = Taliban
Same concepts, different book…
Mackie said:Overall, the medical evidence that homosexuality is biological is certainly not difinitive. I also think it's foolish to look for a unitary explanation to such a complex behavioral pattern.
At first I did not care about a "gay license plate". Now I realize if you can have "GAYSROK", what about "GAYS SUX"? Or "NO BLKS"? Or "WHTS RULE".DRB said:http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/07/28/plates.case.ap/index.html
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah (AP) -- The state of Utah can't block a woman from using her license plate to tell the world "GAYSROK," a judge has ruled.
The state has no good reason to prevent Elizabeth Solomon from having that plate -- which can be read "Gays are OK" or "Gays Rock" -- or another one saying "GAYRYTS," according to Jane Phan, an administrative law judge with the Utah State Tax Commission.
"The narrow issue before us is whether a reasonable person would believe the terms 'gays are OK' and 'gay rights' are, themselves, offensive to good taste and decency. It is the conclusion of the commission that a reasonable person would not," Phan wrote.
Is this sorta like blaming Islam for terrorism?JRogers said:The basic point is that you cannot blame the source for the outcome. It seems to me that the resurgence, power and continued voice of the religious right is fueled by incorrect interpretation and a failure to truly understand the Christian message.
Nope... worng style o 'laying of hands'priceseliger14 said:WAIT.... So if we are strait, but say we are gay, and go to one of these camps, do they provide women to turn me "strait"?
Yup! Gays are evident throughout history... it's real, it's in many cultures, and it's not going to disapear.priceseliger14 said:Sounds stupid to me, if someone chooses a certain lifestyle, I don't think it should be changed. Gays are here to stay so they should get over that.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!Secret Squirrel said:Ug....just another way that zealots and fanatics are going to f*ck the youth (and the not so young but confuzed) of America......Wait, this kinda reminds me of this one time in seminary when Father Joe took me in the back room.....
That's too bad...I would have thought they were shooting for a 'happy ending'. :love:Slugman said:Nope... worng style o 'laying of hands'
ROTFLOL.......................MMike said:I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body. Is there help available for me?
With all due respect your demonstrating your ignorance of both the religions you cite here - apples and oranges. I would suggest you do some research on said books and the philosophies they teach.Slugman said:YUP! Religious Right = Taliban
Same concepts, different book
Amen brotha.....................JRogers said:The basic point is that you cannot blame the source for the outcome. It seems to me that the resurgence, power and continued voice of the religious right is fueled by incorrect interpretation and a failure to truly understand the Christian message. That leads to hate, fear and more misunderstanding. In my experience, too many liberals (a group I count myself in) focus their ire on religion and not the source of its misuse. Not only does this not concentrate on the true issue, but it further divides the left and right as each feels that their way of life is under attack. This is one of the reasons for the support of unconstitutional and irrational issues on the part of the right (school prayer, for example): they feel that they need to counteract the secularizing left by going the other direction. Hating on religion won't solve these problems; it makes them worse.
And that old "look what religion does here- clearly it's evil" argument is played and misleading. Secularism and Atheism don't seem to me to be any better or worse at supporting the good.
I judge on actions... i don't care what BS you beleive to get you there.Andyman_1970 said:With all due respect your demonstrating your ignorance of both the religions you cite here - apples and oranges. I would suggest you do some research on said books and the philosophies they teach.
Actually that's quite Biblical.Slugman said:I judge on actions... i don't care what BS you beleive to get you there.
People can quote religous text all day long - it's how they act that is the true measure of who they are...
Exactly. So then how can you lump them all together?Slugman said:I judge on actions... i don't care what BS you beleive to get you there.
People can quote religous text all day long - it's how they act that is the true measure of who they are...
LOL - and I didn't need to read a bunch of literature to know it!Andyman_1970 said:Actually that's quite Biblical.
I'm not saying ALL christians... I was refering to the far right.Ciaran said:Exactly. So then how can you lump them all together?
I am a christian. I have many friends who are LGB and T. I am not a zealot. (Just very melodramatic)
MSNBC said:U.S. Muslims issue fatwa against terrorism
Scholars condemn attacks on civilians as a violation of Islamic teaching
The Associated Press
Updated: 11:55 a.m. ET July 28, 2005
American Muslim scholars who interpret religious law for their community issued an edict Thursday condemning terrorism against civilians in response to the wave of deadly attacks in Britain and other countries.
In the statement, called a fatwa, the 18-member Fiqh Council of North America wrote that people who commit terrorism in the name of Islam were criminals, not martyrs.
There is no justification in Islam for extremism or terrorism, the scholars wrote. Targeting civilians life and property through suicide bombings or any other method of attack is haram or forbidden.
Interesting, Paul says in Romans 2 (paraphrase) that pagans that don't have the Law sometimes by their nature do what is required of the Law - which is what you're doing..........interesting and yet Biblical.Slugman said:LOL - and I didn't need to read a bunch of literature to know it!
The irony of life is that I am an Athiest married to a Born-Again Christian... and often I am the one who makes her take the right path (more moral as she puts it...).
That could be the number 1 reason I post here on RM - to show people what it is really all about not the characature that is presented most of the time in the media.Slugman said:and personally if I were a Christian, I'd do everything I could to discredit and remove from power anyone who I thought distributed a polluted interpretation of my beliefs.
kinda reminds me of a michael jackson joke i heard........robdamanii said:That's the problem....now they are targeting young kids, because if people actually grow up without believeing this ****, then it's much harder to suck them into the religion after the fact.
And personally I should do more. I sit silent far too often.Andyman_1970 said:That could be the nubmer 1 reason I post here on RM - to show people what it is really all about not the characature that is presented most of the time in the media.
Changleen said:I've never met a Gay person who has told me that he or she felt that their homosexuality was a conscious choice in the same way they choose to change their socks.
Changleen said:I've never met a Gay person who has told me that he or she felt that their homosexuality was a conscious choice in the same way they choose to change their socks.
1. I live with my sister, who is gay. It has never once occurred to me my sister was unnatural, unholy, or needed changing. She told me she was gay 10 years ago, and I and my family have accepted it without a second thought.manimal said:i won't get involved in this one....you know....because i have no idea what i'm talking about. it's not like my dad WAS gay until he went through what i call a biblical 12-step program for sexual addictions and is now a happily married (not to my mom anymore though) straight man. it's not like i grew up in this culture and watched numerous close family friends die of AIDS and other related diseases and listened to them tell me how certain events in their lives affected their DECISION to get involved in the homosexual lifestyle. it's not like both of my parents led and managed the orlando, florida ex-gay ministry off and on for most of my teen years. i guess since i observed this lifestyle change in many a man and woman makes me just a fool for believing that people can choose to break free from a sexual addiction...you know, since it deals with religion and all
Nope, i'm just your regular old christian lunatic that believes what the man on tv tells me about those evil gays. ....or at least that's what most people think when i mention the word "ministry".
i'm right up there with andyman...the fools that preach the "god hates fags" doctrine and the like are the ones that i am so bitter towards. there are freaks in every corner of philosophy, be it atheism, agnostics, catholics, christians, jews....you name it. but discounting someones opinion and life experience because the word "christian" or "ministry" is mentioned is just plain ignorant and is exactly what the "mein kampf" based gay/lesbian propoganda machine wants you to do. because if you don't agree with them, you're an ignorant biggot.
What function does life in general serve? We all simply obey largely Darwinian rules which are essentially about creating organisms which are suitable for their conditions. 'Gay' isn't new. The inability to reproduce 'naturally' can be viewed in many contexts dependant on your particular viewpoint. When compared to simple male to female contact, the reproductive cycles of many insects which include a third party, extra-species transmission mechanism of reproductive material could equally be viewed as 'unnatural'. Gross, that Bee has sex with a flower. That's not natural. Gross, that guy needs technology to reproduce. It's not far removed really is it?beestiboy said:Fine but riddle me this then:
If a person is born gay(which is absolutely possible) what functions does being gay serve.
Oh, I don't know - humans invented birth control - what evolutionary role does that play? Beleive it or not, not every behavior or trait has a simple evolutionary explanation. This is like asking what evolutionary significance green eyes have.beestiboy said:Fine but riddle me this then:If a person is born gay(which is absolutely possible) what functions does being gay serve.
Why? I enjoy it way too much to care "why". For me, it's "When".......loco said:Can anyone explain leg humping???
You really think that no one has come up with a possible evolutionary purpose for homosexuality?beestiboy said:Fine but riddle me this then:
If a person is born gay(which is absolutely possible) what functions does being gay serve. What I mean is that if you think the "zealots" are full of crap what evolutionary function does homosexuality serve. We understand that skin pigmentation has a purpose and so does excessive body hair.
Silver said:You really think that no one has come up with a possible evolutionary purpose for homosexuality?
You know, I've never had someone tell me I was damned because I wouldn't suck their dick. I've never had a couple of homosexuals come to my door to see if I wanted a little of their literature and a chat. There has never been a homosexual president who said that he didn't think that heterosexuals should be considered citizens.sirknight6 said:The whole entire homosexual agenda has become militant by nature, to the point of public recruitment. I personally am tired of the homosexual agenda being forced down my throat!! (No pun intended)
yes, that will probably happen in california....but.....Silver said:You do realize that in 50 years (unless President Dobson gets his way, that is) people will be looking back at your words much like we do when we read what many southern whites were writing in the 50's and 60's.