the bike...uhhh yeah...nickaziz said:Yeah I think people have been clocked in that section going close 70km/h. Any crash at that speed can be pretty hard on a bike.
OMG DudR i hurd that he suxs at bikng and stff! obvously he suks i do big gapz like 15+ ftt and pinkdyke!!!DßR said:One time, like, my freind? Wel, he liek did this jump? An i dunno I guess he sux0red it ro somethign like that lol and well he breaked his bike an d crashed hardd! lol
Yeah, I've never seen a Cannondale or a Rocky breakHeath Sherratt said:I have seen three santa cruz bikes and two konas (three now) snap like that. That's where companies like cannondale, rocky mountain and specialized just blow other companies away with their inhouse testing labs. Lots of companies just do whateve's to get bikes out there but some companies go the extra mile and actually do tests that tell them how long it will take a bike to break with certain pressures applied to it. I support those companies-they want me to live.
As has been said before on this board: ANY bike can break in a catastrophic fashion if the right forces are applied. From the looks of that pic, it was one or both of these problems: a materials/tubing problem that was just a manufacturing issue or (more likely) some incredibly bad crash that would have killed most anything.Heath Sherratt said:I have seen three santa cruz bikes and two konas (three now) snap like that. That's where companies like cannondale, rocky mountain and specialized just blow other companies away with their inhouse testing labs. Lots of companies just do whateve's to get bikes out there but some companies go the extra mile and actually do tests that tell them how long it will take a bike to break with certain pressures applied to it. I support those companies-they want me to live.
well, i can say Kona at least doesnt it seems....Kornphlake said:What exactly makes you think cannondale, rocky mountain or specialized does any more testing than giant, trek, kona, norco, or any of the other big brands?
Well Heath implied that tested frames don't break and then said cannondale, rocky mountain and specialized tests their frames. Now you're saying that kona's break so they must not be tested.Zedro said:well, i can say Kona at least doesnt it seems....
....zedro must be stupid, right?Kornphlake said:Well Heath implied that tested frames don't break and then said cannondale, rocky mountain and specialized tests their frames. Now you're saying that kona's break so they must not be tested.
so going back to my days of logical proofs....
zedro said:....zedro must be stupid, right?
i never said it was because they break (and i ddnt say anything at all), i am aware enough of my surroundings to know that others do. This has to with some insider info, in particular the Stinky9 which was released by the company despite the designer not even having finished designing the damn thing, and additionally where a local rider was consistantly blowing up the rocker plates and where i was asked by him to design new ones, and discovered a HUGE flaw in the design which confirmed why and how they were blowing up (Kona kept promising a newly designed set, he opted for a Primo instead). Also if you pay particular attention to their half-year models or new release models, you may notice some design oddities where they seem to be 'testing' some some things out.