Quantcast

How's parts and POS's of the year

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,517
11,004
AK
UiUiUiUi said:
2003 is a different story.
i had a few chains where the locks that came with them didn't work at all.
You mean power-links? That's funny because I remember a few that were "impossible" to remove. I had needle nose pliers in there and was trying to "squeeze" the links together so it would pop free, but it just did not happen no matter how hard I tried. I'd guess that they don't have a big tolerance on those things to work with.

SRAM is cool for innovation, but as far as durability, reliability, and lifespan it's been playing catch-up to shimano since forever. They may have finally caught up or are close with their new stuff, but there's plenty of "old" high end SRAM stuff out there that is just trash. It just didn't "keep tickin" like shimano.

My sram 9.0 front derailer died 2 nights ago :( I guess I got good life out of it, so I didn't include it in my "bad" list, but I have to wonder if a shimano would have just given up and cracked at the pivots....
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
40,253
9,129
good:

canfield f1
avalanche dhs 3
maxxis slow reezay tires, with honorable mention to michelin S compound
whistler, the north shore, and post canyon (oregon)
dainese armor

bad:

bent mrp plates (not too annoying and it still works, but the noise!)
injuries
me trying to manual the f1 :D
having to work to pay for this stuff