CNN showed a quick video of some old fat fvck sleeping in his chair in senate(?) and someone shaking his chair to wake him up. anyone know who that is?
Dunno, but the Assembly went on for 60+ straight hours. Honestly wouldn't be surprised if people fell asleep during that...CNN showed a quick video of some old fat fvck sleeping in his chair in senate(?) and someone shaking his chair to wake him up. anyone know who that is?
yeah it probably happened during that time.Dunno, but the Assembly went on for 60+ straight hours. Honestly wouldn't be surprised if people fell asleep during that...
Aaaaaaaaaand here's his quote now, after he's realizing that the people in Milwaukee County are probably more liberal than his home constituency:Jeff Stone said:"I applaud Governor Walker for taking bold steps to addres this state's financial crisis and look forward to working with him, my colleagues in the Legislature, our employees, and the taxpayers of this state as we work together to balance our budget and put Wisconsin back on the right track."
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/117380038.htmlArticle said:Stone said Thursday that although he voted for Walker's budget-repair bill and its elimination of much of the collective bargaining for public unions, he didn't agree with those provisions.
"I understand it's a major issue to the unions," Stone said. "It's not necessarily the way I would have drafted this budget-repair bill. I would have approached it in different ways."
Stone said he would have preferred to leave the collective bargaining intact, but felt the other provisions in the measure made the repair bill worth supporting.
"It's not a perfect bill," Stone said.
How about voting for either:RE: Jeff Stone comment -
If he was really looking after his constituency, he voted in line. If he is looking out for himself, as he obviously is, he would have voted differently.
Politicians need to be limited on duration of roles and timing between moving 'up' the chain, as it clouds judgement for what's right for your constituency vs. yourself.
That works too. As for the CA comment... There's a reason why anywhere but here looks attractive for many of us.How about voting for either:
a) What's "right" or
b) What you believe in?
Allowing the public to make all of the decisions leaves you with the budget mess in California where people are demanding services through referendums but refusing to allow the taxes to be raised to cover those services. At the very least if you vote you conscience and always defend your votes, people can decide whether they agree with your views or not.
Speech delivered at Wisconsin Capitol in Madison, March 5, 2011
America is not broke.
Contrary to what those in power would like you to believe so that you'll give up your pension, cut your wages, and settle for the life your great-grandparents had, America is not broke. Not by a long shot. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It's just that it's not in your hands. It has been transferred, in the greatest heist in history, from the workers and consumers to the banks and the portfolios of the uber-rich.
Today just 400 Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined.
Let me say that again. 400 obscenely rich people, most of whom benefited in some way from the multi-trillion dollar taxpayer "bailout" of 2008, now have more loot, stock and property than the assets of 155 million Americans combined. If you can't bring yourself to call that a financial coup d'état, then you are simply not being honest about what you know in your heart to be true.
And I can see why. For us to admit that we have let a small group of men abscond with and hoard the bulk of the wealth that runs our economy, would mean that we'd have to accept the humiliating acknowledgment that we have indeed surrendered our precious Democracy to the moneyed elite. Wall Street, the banks and the Fortune 500 now run this Republic -- and, until this past month, the rest of us have felt completely helpless, unable to find a way to do anything about it.
I have nothing more than a high school degree. But back when I was in school, every student had to take one semester of economics in order to graduate. And here's what I learned: Money doesn't grow on trees. It grows when we make things. It grows when we have good jobs with good wages that we use to buy the things we need and thus create more jobs. It grows when we provide an outstanding educational system that then grows a new generation of inventers, entrepreneurs, artists, scientists and thinkers who come up with the next great idea for the planet. And that new idea creates new jobs and that creates revenue for the state. But if those who have the most money don't pay their fair share of taxes, the state can't function. The schools can't produce the best and the brightest who will go on to create those jobs. If the wealthy get to keep most of their money, we have seen what they will do with it: recklessly gamble it on crazy Wall Street schemes and crash our economy. The crash they created cost us millions of jobs. That too caused a reduction in revenue. And the population ended up suffering because they reduced their taxes, reduced our jobs and took wealth out of the system, removing it from circulation.
The nation is not broke, my friends. Wisconsin is not broke. It's part of the Big Lie. It's one of the three biggest lies of the decade: America/Wisconsin is broke, Iraq has WMD, the Packers can't win the Super Bowl without Brett Favre.
The truth is, there's lots of money to go around. LOTS. It's just that those in charge have diverted that wealth into a deep well that sits on their well-guarded estates. They know they have committed crimes to make this happen and they know that someday you may want to see some of that money that used to be yours. So they have bought and paid for hundreds of politicians across the country to do their bidding for them. But just in case that doesn't work, they've got their gated communities, and the luxury jet is always fully fueled, the engines running, waiting for that day they hope never comes. To help prevent that day when the people demand their country back, the wealthy have done two very smart things:
1. They control the message. By owning most of the media they have expertly convinced many Americans of few means to buy their version of the American Dream and to vote for their politicians. Their version of the Dream says that you, too, might be rich some day – this is America, where anything can happen if you just apply yourself! They have conveniently provided you with believable examples to show you how a poor boy can become a rich man, how the child of a single mother in Hawaii can become president, how a guy with a high school education can become a successful filmmaker. They will play these stories for you over and over again all day long so that the last thing you will want to do is upset the apple cart -- because you -- yes, you, too! -- might be rich/president/an Oscar-winner some day! The message is clear: keep your head down, your nose to the grindstone, don't rock the boat and be sure to vote for the party that protects the rich man that you might be some day.
2. They have created a poison pill that they know you will never want to take. It is their version of mutually assured destruction. And when they threatened to release this weapon of mass economic annihilation in September of 2008, we blinked. As the economy and the stock market went into a tailspin, and the banks were caught conducting a worldwide Ponzi scheme, Wall Street issued this threat: Either hand over trillions of dollars from the American taxpayers or we will crash this economy straight into the ground. Fork it over or it's Goodbye savings accounts. Goodbye pensions. Goodbye United States Treasury. Goodbye jobs and homes and future. It was friggin' awesome and it scared the **** out of everyone. "Here! Take our money! We don't care. We'll even print more for you! Just take it! But, please, leave our lives alone, PLEASE!"
The executives in the board rooms and hedge funds could not contain their laughter, their glee, and within three months they were writing each other huge bonus checks and marveling at how perfectly they had played a nation full of suckers. Millions lost their jobs anyway, and millions lost their homes. But there was no revolt (see #1).
Until now. On Wisconsin! Never has a Michigander been more happy to share a big, great lake with you! You have aroused the sleeping giant know as the working people of the United States of America. Right now the earth is shaking and the ground is shifting under the feet of those who are in charge. Your message has inspired people in all 50 states and that message is: WE HAVE HAD IT! We reject anyone tells us America is broke and broken. It's just the opposite! We are rich with talent and ideas and hard work and, yes, love. Love and compassion toward those who have, through no fault of their own, ended up as the least among us. But they still crave what we all crave: Our country back! Our democracy back! Our good name back! The United States of America. NOT the Corporate States of America. The United States of America!
So how do we get this? Well, we do it with a little bit of Egypt here, a little bit of Madison there. And let us pause for a moment and remember that it was a poor man with a fruit stand in Tunisia who gave his life so that the world might focus its attention on how a government run by billionaires for billionaires is an affront to freedom and morality and humanity.
Thank you, Wisconsin. You have made people realize this was our last best chance to grab the final thread of what was left of who we are as Americans. For three weeks you have stood in the cold, slept on the floor, skipped out of town to Illinois -- whatever it took, you have done it, and one thing is for certain: Madison is only the beginning. The smug rich have overplayed their hand. They couldn't have just been content with the money they raided from the treasury. They couldn't be satiated by simply removing millions of jobs and shipping them overseas to exploit the poor elsewhere. No, they had to have more – something more than all the riches in the world. They had to have our soul. They had to strip us of our dignity. They had to shut us up and shut us down so that we could not even sit at a table with them and bargain about simple things like classroom size or bulletproof vests for everyone on the police force or letting a pilot just get a few extra hours sleep so he or she can do their job -- their $19,000 a year job. That's how much some rookie pilots on commuter airlines make, maybe even the rookie pilots flying people here to Madison. But he's stopped trying to get better pay. All he asks is that he doesn't have to sleep in his car between shifts at O'Hare airport. That's how despicably low we have sunk. The wealthy couldn't be content with just paying this man $19,000 a year. They wanted to take away his sleep. They wanted to demean and dehumanize him. After all, he's just another slob.
And that, my friends, is Corporate America's fatal mistake. But trying to destroy us they have given birth to a movement -- a movement that is becoming a massive, nonviolent revolt across the country. We all knew there had to be a breaking point some day, and that point is upon us. Many people in the media don't understand this. They say they were caught off guard about Egypt, never saw it coming. Now they act surprised and flummoxed about why so many hundreds of thousands have come to Madison over the last three weeks during brutal winter weather. "Why are they all standing out there in the cold? I mean there was that election in November and that was supposed to be that!
"There's something happening here, and you don't know what it is, do you...?"
America ain't broke! The only thing that's broke is the moral compass of the rulers. And we aim to fix that compass and steer the ship ourselves from now on. Never forget, as long as that Constitution of ours still stands, it's one person, one vote, and it's the thing the rich hate most about America -- because even though they seem to hold all the money and all the cards, they begrudgingly know this one unshakeable basic fact: There are more of us than there are of them!
Madison, do not retreat. We are with you. We will win together
Our six largest bank holding companies currently have assets valued at just over 63 percent of GDP (end of Q4, 2010). This is up from around 55% of GDP before the crisis (e.g., 2006) and no more than 17% of GDP in 1995.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/simon-johnson/a-healthy-financial-syste_b_831844.html
WI's pension fund is 97+% funded. Something like $80b in assets. Of course, that makes it a very juicy target for someone like Walker who could raid it if everyone switched over to a contribution plan like a 401(k).Wealth transfer is always a bad idea. And we are broke there is something like 3 trillion dollars of unfunded government pension liabilities. Point of fact historically unions were very opposed to being in the government business because there is no alternative. Meaning ****ty companies go away, ****ty governments rob your children's children. Welcome to the new age......
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/09/wisconsin-gop-plan-advance-anti-union_n_833796.htmlIn a bold gambit to put an end to the weeks-long budget standoff in Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker (R) split his controversial budget-repair bill in two on Wednesday, allowing the Senate to pass the most hotly contested provisions while their 14 Democratic colleagues remained out of state.
The parliamentary maneuver, first reported by local press, allowed the anti-collective bargaining measure to pass with just Republican support. Under Wisconsin law, a quorum of 3/5 of the Senate is needed for a statute that is fiscal in nature. A lower quorum is needed for non-fiscal matters.
It was also a 180-degree reversal by Walker and state Senate Republicans, who have insisted for the past three weeks that the collective bargaining provision was designed to help alleviate the state’s budget problems. State Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R) had previously said he would not attempt to pass any portions of the bill without Democrats present.
Wisconsin Democrats decried the move as an unprecedented and blatant end-run, but it was clear that they were powerless to stop it. Indeed, it took the conference committee only a matter of minutes to pass the severed off measure by a four-to-two vote. Minutes later, the same bill passed through the entire Senate by an 18-1 margin, with Sen. Dale Schultz, a Republican moderate who had proposed a compromise measure, lodging the only no vote.
So, first of all there's no way that all 8 repubs and 6 dems will fall in recall elections. Most of the Dems (all but 1 or 2) are in safe Democratic districts, so I'd be shocked if they're even able to get enough signatures for it to go forward. I know that my senator represents a HEAVILY Democratic district, and what's more, we had something like 80% turnout in my city in Nov '10. That's important because you have to get 20% (25?%) of the number of people who voted in Nov '10. So if a community had a low turnout rate, the number of signatures you need to get are less.Party's over, looks like it passed. They did take out a lot of the questionable selling of public property additions, so I'm not against what happened here. I was reading that there are recalls out for 8 repubs and 6 dems, which is amusing, as the amount it will cost the state. Plus if there is an in-line reversal (dem for repub, repub for dem) Repubs will still have a majority.
So it's not ALL fiscal bills, only the vast majority of them. Basically if it has anything to do with taxes (new, continues or renews), or the state spends money, or the state makes promise to spend money, then it's a "fiscal bill". There are definitely areas of the bill where it's *really shady* as far as whether this will pass the constitutionality test. Is requiring state employees to contribute more to their health care/pensions a tax? Is it reduced compensation? An argument could be made for either, so it's going to be up to the lawyers to hash out. There's also a bit about a new employee (political crony) position, but the bill doesn't allocate any money to pay for him... Now suddenly the Governor is treading on *really* shaky ground, since hiring someone is a de facto promise to pay him next year. Does that count as a state promise to spend money in the future? Dunno, up to the courts to decide...Text of Section 8:
Vote on Fiscal Bills; Quorum
On the passage in either house of the legislature of any law which imposes, continues or renews a tax, or creates a debt or charge, or makes, continues or renews an appropriation of public or trust money, or releases, discharges or commutes a claim or demand of the state, the question shall be taken by yeas and nays, which shall be duly entered on the journal; and three−fifths of all the members elected to such house shall in all such cases be required to constitute a quorum therein.
Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the gov's policies...article said:The governor and Legislature seem to believe that they can save the house by burning it down.
Lol, FOOLED YOU!Party's over, looks like it passed. They did take out a lot of the questionable selling of public property additions, so I'm not against what happened here. I was reading that there are recalls out for 8 repubs and 6 dems, which is amusing, as the amount it will cost the state. Plus if there is an in-line reversal (dem for repub, repub for dem) Repubs will still have a majority.
FDL said:Meanwhile, in a curious move, the Legislative Fiscal Bureau produced a new analysis of the bill, changed from the previous night, which includes more elements of the original budget repair bill. Nobody could produce a copy of the actual legislation in time for the conference committee session yesterday, leading to speculation that it was being written while the session was going on. The Director of the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Bob Lang, said that these omissions were just oversights, and the bill language remained the same throughout. Mm-hm.
If you read the LFB correction, youll see that the sale of state-owned heating, cooling and power plants has returned to the bill.
Wow. The initial article I read noted that as a removed line item. I don't support it on that alone.
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/10/wisconsin-assembly-poised-to-pass-controversial-labor-bill/?hpt=T1&iref=BN1The Wisconsin state Assembly on Thursday afternoon passed a controversial bill that curtails most state workers’ collective bargaining rights, one day after state Senate Republicans used a technical procedure to get around the intentional absence of 14 Democrats and pass the measure in their chamber.
The bill will reach Gov. Scott Walker's desk for final approval. The bill would, among other things, allow public workers to collectively negotiate wages only, prohibit public-worker raises beyond inflation, and bar unions from taking dues from public workers’ checks. Walker has argued the bill is necessary to help the state correct its deficits and avoid massive layoffs and property tax hikes.
http://www.ianspizza.com/This is seriously messed up.
Dante - I have $50 bucks for the political organization of your choice. Which is the best one to fight this?
Probably a pretty good choice, especially on Saturday when there are supposed to be 100,000 protesters out again.
First up is April 5th, which is local elections and a state supreme court race (including one liberal and one conservative). Then there are 3 assembly seats that have to be filled in a special May election. Then there are just recall elections until Nov 2012 when the next general election is (all Assemblymen, 1/2 of the State Senators).How long until the next general election in your state?
Although he did only beat a tax-dodging deadbeat with a couple of Disorderly Conduct and Restraining Orders though.... Kind of surprised that 35% of the people *actually* did vote for the guy.article said:Democratic state Sen. Dave Hansen of Green Bay was the first of nine state senators to face a final recall election, and he easily survived Tuesday.
http://kfmonkey.blogspot.com/2005/10/lunch-discussions-145-crazification.htmlKind of surprised that 35% of the people *actually* did vote for the guy.
Meh, if Walker isn't petrified, he damn well should be. These were Republicans who won their districts in '08 (when WI went 54% for BHO). Even still, 2 lost their seats and Olsen only won 52-48%. In 2008 he didn't even have a Democratic challenger.....unions couldn't buy it back.
apart from watching re-air of rachel & ed in the middle of the night*, i haven't followed this too terribly closely since the dems skipped town a year or so ago, but it seems this was effectively a referendum on walker. pretty sure he's since exhaled.Meh, if Walker isn't petrified, he damn well should be.
Ehhhhh, not really. Democrats won in 2 of the districts that went Republican in 2008 and solidly for Walker in 2010. We'll wait and see the numbers, but I'd bet that Democrats did better in every race/district than they had in either the 2010 elections or the judicial election this spring. The Dems have the ground game to get Walker's name on the ballot in January, and he's sitting at 39% approval rating.apart from watching re-air of rachel & ed in the middle of the night*, i haven't followed this too terribly closely since the dems skipped town a year or so ago, but it seems this was effectively a referendum on walker. pretty sure he's since exhaled.