Quantcast

If you can read this, you are part of the problem

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
Humans living far beyond planet's means: WWF
Oct 24, 6:29 AM (ET)
By Ben Blanchard


BEIJING (Reuters) - Humans are stripping nature at an unprecedented rate and will need two planets' worth of natural resources every year by 2050 on current trends, the WWF conservation group said on Tuesday.

Populations of many species, from fish to mammals, had fallen by about a third from 1970 to 2003 largely because of human threats such as pollution, clearing of forests and overfishing, the group also said in a two-yearly report.

"For more than 20 years we have exceeded the earth's ability to support a consumptive lifestyle that is unsustainable and we cannot afford to continue down this path," WWF Director-General James Leape said, launching the WWF's 2006 Living Planet Report.

"If everyone around the world lived as those in America, we would need five planets to support us," Leape, an American, said in Beijing.

People in the United Arab Emirates were placing most stress per capita on the planet ahead of those in the United States, Finland and Canada, the report said.

Australia was also living well beyond its means.

The average Australian used 6.6 "global" hectares to support their developed lifestyle, ranking behind the United States and Canada, but ahead of the United Kingdom, Russia, China and Japan.

"If the rest of the world led the kind of lifestyles we do here in Australia, we would require three-and-a-half planets to provide the resources we use and to absorb the waste," said Greg Bourne, WWF-Australia chief executive officer.

Everyone would have to change lifestyles -- cutting use of fossil fuels and improving management of everything from farming to fisheries.

"As countries work to improve the well-being of their people, they risk bypassing the goal of sustainability," said Leape, speaking in an energy-efficient building at Beijing's prestigous Tsinghua University.

"It is inevitable that this disconnect will eventually limit the abilities of poor countries to develop and rich countries to maintain their prosperity," he added.

The report said humans' "ecological footprint" -- the demand people place on the natural world -- was 25 percent greater than the planet's annual ability to provide everything from food to energy and recycle all human waste in 2003.

In the previous report, the 2001 overshoot was 21 percent.

"On current projections humanity, will be using two planets' worth of natural resources by 2050 -- if those resources have not run out by then," the latest report said.

"People are turning resources into waste faster than nature can turn waste back into resources."

RISING POPULATION

"Humanity's footprint has more than tripled between 1961 and 2003," it said. Consumption has outpaced a surge in the world's population, to 6.5 billion from 3 billion in 1960. U.N. projections show a surge to 9 billion people around 2050.

It said that the footprint from use of fossil fuels, whose heat-trapping emissions are widely blamed for pushing up world temperatures, was the fastest-growing cause of strain.

Leape said China, home to a fifth of the world's population and whose economy is booming, was making the right move in pledging to reduce its energy consumption by 20 percent over the next five years.

"Much will depend on the decisions made by China, India and other rapidly developing countries," he added.

The WWF report also said that an index tracking 1,300 vetebrate species -- birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals -- showed that populations had fallen for most by about 30 percent because of factors including a loss of habitats to farms.

Among species most under pressure included the swordfish and the South African Cape vulture. Those bucking the trend included rising populations of the Javan rhinoceros and the northern hairy-nosed wombat in Australia.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
I often wonder how the world's "Protected Areas" will be handled once people start starving and freezing to death. You think the Natl. parks will be kept off limits if widespread famine takes hold in the US? You think protected species will or wont be harvested for food?
Maybe Opie's BC in the water supply wouldnt be the worst idea ever....if we could find a kind that wouldnt screw the environment.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,419
22,508
Sleazattle
Meh, as population density increases the ability to transmit disease is increased. A nice superflu or airborn ebola like virus will take care of things well enough.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
I was sort of joking about birth control in the water supply, but also sort of serious.

Population growth is a problem.

But it's funny how people hate WalMart, eventho they've issued a mandate to their suppliers to develop self-sustaining production. No more over-fishing, etc.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
I wonder if populations are growing or declining in Africa?
They'd have to be growing much quicker considering the resources used by an average American are about 60 times greater than that of average resident of a developing nation.

Population usually go through 4 distinct stages of growth described by the Demographic Transition Model, I'm sure you've seen that before in HS or College?
 

Transcend

My Nuts Are Flat
Apr 18, 2002
18,040
3
Towing the party line.
I often wonder how the world's "Protected Areas" will be handled once people start starving and freezing to death. You think the Natl. parks will be kept off limits if widespread famine takes hold in the US? You think protected species will or wont be harvested for food?
Maybe Opie's BC in the water supply wouldnt be the worst idea ever....if we could find a kind that wouldnt screw the environment.
The US has no excuse to do that. At this point, the US has more than enough food production capabilities to feed the ENTIRE planet. Waste and excess in the Western world is so rampant however, that they can barely feed themselves.
 

H8R

Cranky Pants
Nov 10, 2004
13,959
35
Where do I apply? Are there different permits for different weapons? I would like a ball peen hammer permit.
I want a Throw People In Piles of Broken Glass and Stomp on Their Necks permit.

I got my boots on.
 

MudGrrl

AAAAH! Monkeys stole my math!
Mar 4, 2004
3,123
0
Boston....outside of it....
if we all have to go out an kill people, can my assigned targets be tofu people? I'm not a big fan of the killing.



unless it's Paris Hilton.
I could rip that btchs face off pretty easy.
 

rockwool

Turbo Monkey
Apr 19, 2004
2,658
0
Filastin
I often wonder how the world's "Protected Areas" will be handled once people start starving and freezing to death. You think the Natl. parks will be kept off limits if widespread famine takes hold in the US? You think protected species will or wont be harvested for food?
Maybe Opie's BC in the water supply wouldnt be the worst idea ever....if we could find a kind that wouldnt screw the environment.
If I would get so hungry I would have to eat a human, I'd pick a female, they have higher percentege of water and body fat which must mean their meat is jucier. I'd make sure its one that has a desk job and doesn't move to much on freetime so that her meat isn't tough and wiry. She must not be too old, early 20's tops, and I would share her with a good cook.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
If I would get so hungry I would have to eat a human, I'd pick a female, they have higher percentege of water and body fat which must mean their meat is jucier. I'd make sure its one that has a desk job and doesn't move to much on freetime so that her meat isn't tough and wiry. She must not be too old, early 20's tops, and I would share her with a good cook.
Id go for babies.
 

JohnE

filthy rascist
May 13, 2005
13,563
2,210
Front Range, dude...
If you kill yourself, you wont be part of the problem anymore. Plus, those of us who dont care as much about the environment can eat you. Win/win!
:biggrin: :biggrin: :banana: :banana: