Quantcast

Intel inflated against Iraq...I mean Iran?

Secret Squirrel

Secret Squirrel

There is no Justice!
Dec 21, 2004
8,150
1
Up sh*t creek, without a paddle
Old Man G Funk said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091302052.html

Discuss.
Click to expand...
Ugh....

This is just ducky....Iran, Iraq, Iran, Iraq...better mind your n's and q's....
Article said:
When the congressional report was released last month, Hoekstra said his intent was "to help increase the American public's understanding of Iran as a threat." Spokesman Jamal Ware said yesterday that Hoekstra will respond to the IAEA letter.
Click to expand...
Great... "Hey! Who wants to play more war??!??"
Article said:
Hoekstra's committee is working on a separate report about North Korea that is also being written principally by Fleitz. A draft of the report, provided to The Post, includes several assertions about North Korea's weapons program that the intelligence officials said they cannot substantiate, including one that Pyongyang is already enriching uranium.

The intelligence community believes North Korea is trying to acquire an enrichment capability but has no proof that an enrichment facility has been built, the officials said.
Click to expand...
No doubt NK is FUBAR'd...but c'mon. No need for fakin' sh*t outright. Maybe some sensory depravation techniques need to be used....


Down with Kim Jong Il
Till you get your fill
There be ill will
Time to take that cyanide pill
 
Changleen

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,920
2,887
Pōneke
This is pretty disgusting. Lieing about national security issues like this should be a severely punishable offence. The republicunts make me sick. I only hope America has at least half a brain this time round. What a bunch of cocksuckers. I have no respect for these morons whatsoever.
 
schweino1

schweino1

Monkey
Dec 6, 2004
337
0
Ok, so lets say they enriched a "shaitload" of Uranium.... now what? how are they gonna make the bombs? dont they need "plutonium" to do that?

just wondering....
 
Changleen

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,920
2,887
Pōneke
schweino1 said:
Ok, so lets say they enriched a "shaitload" of Uranium.... now what? how are they gonna make the bombs? dont they need "plutonium" to do that?

just wondering....
Click to expand...
No, highly enriched Uranium or Plutonium will both werk, but I don't think you understood the article...
 
Changleen

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,920
2,887
Pōneke
$tinkle said:
how do you feel about stuffing it down your pants & socks?
Click to expand...
So Berger is probably affiliated with the whole NWO/CIA/ISI thing, or just stupid. *shrug* There's not exactly a shortage of people in Warshington who are pushing hidden agendas. They all need to be outted somehow if you don't want to live in perpetual war.

Just something for you to ponder - With Bush's current 'crackdowns' and attempts to Nazify the judicial process for anyone he might vaguely consider an enemy of the state, what happens when a white American muslim eventually does something that in some way resembles ter'rism? Posting on this board for one thing might get awfully... risky.
 
DaveW

DaveW

Space Monkey
Jul 2, 2001
11,752
3,242
The bunker at parliament
$tinkle said:
how do you feel about stuffing it down your pants & socks?

so help me, if we find one drop of oil in NZ, just ONE drop....
Click to expand...
Err yeah we do have oil.... one third of NZ's POL needs are sourced internally with more fields being proved at the moment.
1/3rd is enought for all emergency, govenment, public transport and defence needs.
So if the sh1t hits the fan with the standard US economic blockade situation the national fuel stratigic plan is to be able to stand alone for a fair while.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom