Its good to know what your idea of effective governance is. I should have assumed as much after your jew comments.Changleen said:This isn't exactly the first story of this type, Burly. And the fact remains the US removed effective governance from the country opening up the way for this to happen.
**** you know what else isnt accounted for? Tons of chemical weapons. Id say thats easily the biggest concern. Maybe we should place sanctions on the insurgents.Changleen said:PLEASE stick to the point for once.
Changleen said:Are these the Chemical weapons that apparantly went over the border to Syria?
Well, there's the risk of seriously pissing off the Muslim world even more than you have already. There are a few important Mosques there for a start, and once everyone has left, there would be no need to nuke it, right?BurlySurly said:Prolly. Or to Osama's personal stockpile somewhere. Coming to a train station near you.
Ive been thinking...Why dont we just drop some leaflets on Fallujah with pictures of the Hiroshima Blast on them and the words "Get the **** out by (whatever date) because we are gunna Nuke this mutha"
Then we set up roadblocks with hundreds of thousands of soldiers and interview and search EVERYONE who leaves. Then we just level the muther****ing city. We dont actually have to use a nuke, but seriously, just smash the place with a big mutha.
Closer to you, I should think. Or nowhere. That shi1t's 10+ years old. It does have a 'use by' date.BurlySurly said:Coming to a train station near you.
Changleen said:Well, there's the risk of seriously pissing off the Muslim world even more than you have already. There are a few important Mosques there for a start, and once everyone has left, there would be no need to nuke it, right?
And secondly, because it's using a nuclear weapon on a civilian target?
Yeah, I said "hundreds of thousands" of troops. Some could be the Iraqi trainees, or we could try some other stuff like dig a big ass moat/mote/mowte (**** I dunno how to spell that) around the city and fill it with oill and set it on fire with only one Exit so that they all gotta come out one way, that way it doesnt require so many troops. Well, not dig a "moat" actually but find some other way to seal off the city. Like just give troops shoot to kill orders at the other exits.Changleen said:And yes, If you could get everyone to leave, that would be great. You'd need a fvckbucket full of troops to completely encirlce the city though. Otherwise the 'bad guys' would just slope off into the desert. This would require futher commitment of American troops though. Are you willing to get drafted?
Yeah, secure the Oil refineries, secure the roads to the oil refineries, secure the oil, secure the staff, get the oil pumping, sort out the Haliburton contracts, abusing all those Iraqi prisoners...Yet even as Mr. Bush pressed his case, his aides tried to explain why American forces had ignored a series of warnings from the International Atomic Energy Agency about the vulnerability of the huge stockpile of high explosives, which was first reported on Monday by CBS and The New York Times.
In several sessions with reporters, the White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, alternately insisted that Mr. Bush "wants to make sure that we get to the bottom of this" and tried to distance the president from knowledge of the issue, saying Mr. Bush was informed of the disappearance only within the last 10 days. White House officials said they could not explain why warnings from the International Atomic Energy Agency in May 2003 about the vulnerability of the stockpile to looting never resulted in action. At one point, Mr. McClellan pointed out that "there were a number of priorities at the end of Operation Iraqi Freedom."
"It's an outrageous mistake, and one I'm afraid we will pay for for a long period of time," Dr. Albright said on CNN. Mr. Lockhart said, "This president was warned."
Damn those Scandanavians and their generic furniture.Hawkeye said:Was there anything there after the IKEA people left in 2002? .