Quantcast

Iraq to pass law legalising rape...

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,923
2,890
Pōneke
...of their own economy. If anyone had any lingering doubt that the new Iraqi government is little more than a US tool, or that oil wasn't one of the major reasons we went in, read this:

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132569.ece

Future of Iraq: The spoils of war
How the West will make a killing on Iraqi oil riches
By Danny Fortson, Andrew Murray-Watson and Tim Webb
Published: 07 January 2007


Iraq's massive oil reserves, the third-largest in the world, are about to be thrown open for large-scale exploitation by Western oil companies under a controversial law which is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament within days.

The US government has been involved in drawing up the law, a draft of which has been seen by The Independent on Sunday. It would give big oil companies such as BP, Shell and Exxon 30-year contracts to extract Iraqi crude and allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil interests in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972.

The huge potential prizes for Western firms will give ammunition to critics who say the Iraq war was fought for oil. They point to statements such as one from Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in 1999, while he was still chief executive of the oil services company Halliburton, that the world would need an additional 50 million barrels of oil a day by 2010. "So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies," he said.

Oil industry executives and analysts say the law, which would permit Western companies to pocket up to three-quarters of profits in the early years, is the only way to get Iraq's oil industry back on its feet after years of sanctions, war and loss of expertise. But it will operate through "production-sharing agreements" (or PSAs) which are highly unusual in the Middle East, where the oil industry in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world's two largest producers, is state controlled.

Opponents say Iraq, where oil accounts for 95 per cent of the economy, is being forced to surrender an unacceptable degree of sovereignty.

Proposing the parliamentary motion for war in 2003, Tony Blair denied the "false claim" that "we want to seize" Iraq's oil revenues. He said the money should be put into a trust fund, run by the UN, for the Iraqis, but the idea came to nothing. The same year Colin Powell, then Secretary of State, said: "It cost a great deal of money to prosecute this war. But the oil of the Iraqi people belongs to the Iraqi people; it is their wealth, it will be used for their benefit. So we did not do it for oil."

Supporters say the provision allowing oil companies to take up to 75 per cent of the profits will last until they have recouped initial drilling costs. After that, they would collect about 20 per cent of all profits, according to industry sources in Iraq. But that is twice the industry average for such deals.

Greg Muttitt, a researcher for Platform, a human rights and environmental group which monitors the oil industry, said Iraq was being asked to pay an enormous price over the next 30 years for its present instability. "They would lose out massively," he said, "because they don't have the capacity at the moment to strike a good deal."

Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister, Barham Salih, who chairs the country's oil committee, is expected to unveil the legislation as early as today. "It is a redrawing of the whole Iraqi oil industry [to] a modern standard," said Khaled Salih, spokesman for the Kurdish Regional Government, a party to the negotiations. The Iraqi government hopes to have the law on the books by March.

Several major oil companies are said to have sent teams into the country in recent months to lobby for deals ahead of the law, though the big names are considered unlikely to invest until the violence in Iraq abates.

James Paul, executive director at the Global Policy Forum, the international government watchdog, said: "It is not an exaggeration to say that the overwhelming majority of the population would be opposed to this. To do it anyway, with minimal discussion within the [Iraqi] parliament is really just pouring more oil on the fire."

Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman and a former chief economist at Shell, said it was crucial that any deal would guarantee funds for rebuilding Iraq. "It is absolutely vital that the revenue from the oil industry goes into Iraqi development and is seen to do so," he said. "Although it does make sense to collaborate with foreign investors, it is very important the terms are seen to be fair."
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
I thought we went to war to save the Iraqis...

I see them stuck every single snowstorm here. I'll start taking pics for you.
Being from the Bay Area, I would think any driver in a Hummer would be able to plow thru the snow...
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,430
22,517
Sleazattle
I thought we went to war to save the Iraqis...


Being from the Bay Area, I would think any driver in a Hummer would be able to plow thru the snow...
I'd say that is probably the problem, the jerks driving the Hummers could probably get a snow cat stuck. One of the keys to not getting stuck in snow is realizing that you can.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
So I guess that you want Iraq to fail economically and not get investment to get their oil industry moving?

Maybe you would prefer the honesty of the oil for food scam... I mean program.
You're an expert here, so I ask you honestly, does the proposed model have enough of the profits flowing back into the right places in the Iraqi government/economy to produce non-oil-related infrastructure growth? We've seen this before and while massive amounts of money may flow back into Iraq, they will likely line the pockets of a few powerful Iraqi oil barons/families and never make it to roads, schools, sanitation, etc.
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,923
2,890
Pōneke
So I guess that you want Iraq to fail economically and not get investment to get their oil industry moving?
Uh, because Iraqis are incapable of building oil refineries? Only the multinationals have this precious 3 grader chemistry knowledge? WTF? And what about all those billions the US already 'invested'? None of that went towards the refineries now did it?
Maybe you would prefer the honesty of the oil for food scam... I mean program.
Would that be the one where the nationalised oil industry was pumping oil for itself just fine, then was forced to basically give it to the UN? What exactly are you arguing here? Seems like 'Only the multinationals can pump oil' which is BS.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Changleen, they cant even get their water running or their people to stop exploding.