Quantcast

Iraq's Oil

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
From Greg Palast, the BBC and Harpers Magazine:
_________________________________________________________________
BAGHDAD COUP D'ETAT FOR BIG OIL
Monday, March 28, 2005

Harper's Magazine investigation reveals how Big Oil vanquished the neo-cons ... and OPEC is the winner.

"For months, the State Department officially denied the existence of this 323-page plan for Iraq's oil ...."

Some conspiracy nuts believe the Bush Administration had a secret plan to control Iraq's oil. In fact, there were TWO plans. In a joint investigation with BBC Television Newsnight, Harper's Magazine has uncovered a hidden battle over Iraq's oil. It began right after Mr. Bush took office - with a previously unreported plot to invade Iraq.

From the exclusive Harper's report by Greg Palast:

Within weeks of the first inaugural, prominent Iraqi expatriates -- many with ties to U.S. industry -- were invited to secret discussions directed by Pamela Quanrud, National Security Council, now at the State Department. "It quickly became an oil group," said one participant, Falah Aljibury. Aljibury is an advisor to Amerada Hess' oil trading arm and Goldman Sachs.

"The petroleum industry, the chemical industry, the banking industry -- they'd hoped that Iraq would go for a revolution like in the past and government was shut down for two or three days," Aljibury told me. On this plan, Hussein would simply have been replaced by some former Baathist general.

However, by February 2003, a hundred-page blue-print for the occupied nation, favored by neo-cons, had been enshrined as official policy. "Moving the Iraqi Economy from Recovery to Sustainable Growth" generally embodied the principles for postwar Iraq favored by Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and the Iran-Contra figure, now Deputy National Security Advisor, Elliott Abrams. The blue-print mapped out a radical makeover of Iraq as a free-maket Xanadu including, on page 73, the sell-off of the nation's crown jewels: "privatization [of] the oil and supporting industries."

It was reasoned that if Iraq's fields were broken up and sold off, competing operators would crank up production. This extra crude would flood world petroleum markets, OPEC would devolve into mass cheating and overproduction, oil prices would fall over a cliff, and Saudi Arabia, both economically and politically, would fall to its knees.

However, in plotting the destruction of OPEC, the neocons failed to predict the virulent resistance of insurgent forces: the U.S. oil industry itself. Rob McKee, a former executive vice-president of ConocoPhillips, designated by the Bush Administration to advise the Iraqi oil ministry, had little tolerance for the neocons' threat to privatize the oil fields nor their obsession on ways to undermine OPEC. (In 2004, with oil approaching the $50 a barrel mark all year, the major U.S. oil companies posted record or near-record profits. ConocoPhillips this February reported a doubling of its quarterly profits.)

In November 2003, McKee quietly ordered up a new plan for Iraq's oil. For months, the State Department officially denied the existence of this 323-page plan, but when I threatened legal action, I was able to obtain the multi-volume document describing seven possible models of oil production for Iraq, each one merely a different flavor of a single option: a state-owned oil company under which the state maintains official title to the reserves but operation and control are given to foreign oil companies.

According to Ed Morse, another Hess Oil advisor, the switch to an OPEC-friendly policy for Iraq was driven by Dick Cheney. "The VP's office [has] not pursued a policy in Iraq that would lead to a rapid opening of the Iraqi energy sector that would put us on a track to say, "We're going to put a squeeze on OPEC."

Cheney, far from "putting the squeeze on OPEC," has taken a defacto seat there, allowing the cartel to maintain its suffocating grip on the U.S. economy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the full story in the April edition of Harper's Magazine, out this week: "OPEC ON THE MARCH: Why Iraq Still Sells Its Oil à la Cartel," by Greg Palast.

Watch Palast's report on the Harper's discovery on BBC television's premier nightly current affairs show, Newsnight, viewable on-line at:

BBC Newsnight - U.S. Secret Plan for Iraq's Oil
http://gregpalast.com/video/BBCIraqOilReport.mov

Greg Palast is the author of the New York Times bestseller, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy." View his writings at www.GregPalast.com.

Leni von Eckardt contributed investigative research to this project.

_________________________________________________________________
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,912
2,877
Pōneke
LordOpie said:
I friggin' told y'all it was about oil TWO YEARS AGO!
And, just like 2 years ago, no-one will do anything about it, no-one will lose their job for beng a liar, the media will largly brush it under the carpet and the Bush administration will sail onwards towards tyranny. Hooray for America.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
Bad news from Iraq:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4395525.stm

Quote:

Increasing numbers of children in Iraq do not have enough food to eat and more than a quarter are chronically undernourished, a UN report says.
Malnutrition rates in children under five have almost doubled since the US-led invasion - to nearly 8% by the end of last year, it says.

_________________________________________________________________

(And no, I don't think pulling out now is the answer.)
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
$tinkle said:
maybe this time you won't ignore my post when i find some "bad news from iraq":
http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com/2005/01/bad-news-from-iraq.html

maybe this time you won't ignore my post when i find some "good news from iraq":
http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com/2005/03/good-news-from-iraq-part-24.html
I'm sorry if you're you feeling ignored.

On the whole I am exposed to far more bad news than good (much as your first link shows) as far as Iraq is concerned. I do not post daily bad news as there is no good reason or purpose to do so. This I felt was different as it is a clear indication of what was an already poor situation made far worse by the invasion.

Oddly some of the information in your second link (more families able to afford meat with their meals) do not square with the information reported by the UN. Furthermore the rejoicing that common citizens are taking up arms against the insurgents is hardly warranted as it shows how poor a job the security forces are doing and possibly presages a full civil war.

The interim government is failing to agree a way forward and hope rests on plans and projects that are years from fruition. Still if you take a country back fifty years it would certainly appear that the only way is up, as the respondents to the survey agree.

I sincerely hope for a peaceful and pregressive Iraq but we're not even close at the moment.
 

Inclag

Turbo Monkey
Sep 9, 2001
2,780
465
MA
:rolleyes:

All I need to say is spend some time researching the economy and energy/consumption and analyze the data yourself then come up with whatever conclusions you want.

This has little to do with thread, but does anyone else get as pissed as I do of all these people who find "facts" because they can google and find news articles???
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,912
2,877
Pōneke
So anyway, meanwhile the final report on pre-war Intelligence came out and basically said Bush is utterly blameless and it was all the fault of the intelligence community. Of course, those who headed it up at the time have long since gone so once again the status quo neatly sidestep any possible blame. What a suprise. Everyone conveniently forgets those people who went on record saying Bush asked for a reason to attack Iraq post 9/11. Lame.

Anyway, I was reading a few articles about the report and how it essentially says the US knows nothing about anything that's going on in any of the 'Axis of Evil' or 'Outposts of Tyranny' Countries. This quote caught my eye (from MSNBC):

The report focused not just on U.S. failures in regards to assessing Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, which is already well documented, but on the fact that the American intelligence community knows "dangerously little" about the threats or intentions of some of our most dangerous foes.
So, if you don't know anything about the threats or even the intentions of these people, how do you know they're your foes? They may well be completely ambivilent towards you. You just don't actually know. Ah, but of course that doesn't fit with the neo-con agenda which requires an 'evil enemy' to work properly. What an excellent situation to be in.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Inclag said:
This has little to do with thread, but does anyone else get as pissed as I do of all these people who find "facts" because they can google and find news articles???
you must've missed this crown jewel that fluff shared with the class last week
 

budgetrider

Monkey
Jan 23, 2005
129
0
Fluff, I wish I had read this thread before I posted my "why's oil so expensive" thread. You're obviously way ahead of me...