Quantcast

Is commitment to marriage really a conservative value?

Jr_Bullit

I'm sooo teenie weenie!!!
Sep 8, 2001
2,028
1
North of Oz
Or is it more, an acknowledgement that the institution of marriage has been degraded so far, that those who want to recognize it for what it is are bringing it back to the surface.

As has been pointed out - I'm definitely a solid middle-grounder - some of my views are very very liberal, others in line with an "american" conservative viewpoint. On this one, I'd have to say - if you're gonna make a vow, you better be willing to keep it. There's enough other types of relationships available to couples these days for marriage to continue to be degraded by a high divorce rate, and people only after each others' money. Marriage for convenience is just bloody stupid. (but, lol, I've also got no issues with gay marriage, so long as they actually keep their vow).

Trying to Strengthen an 'I Do' With a More Binding Legal Tie
By RICK LYMAN

Published: February 15, 2005

LITTLE ROCK, Ark., Feb. 14 - In front of more than 5,000 cheering constituents in a North Little Rock sports arena, Gov. Mike Huckabee took the former Janet McCain to be his lawfully wedded wife Monday night, just as he did nearly 31 years ago, for better or for worse, in sickness and in health, until death do them part.

This time, although the actual vows were not repeated, the emphasis was clearly on the "until death" pledge.

Upgrading their vows to that of a covenant marriage, a legally binding contract available only in Arkansas, Arizona and Louisiana, the Huckabees hope to jump-start a conservative movement that has shown little sign of moving in recent years. A covenant marriage commits a couple to counseling before any separation and limits divorce to a handful of grounds, like adultery or abuse.

"I know that some people have thought this whole thing is cynical, that it's some sort of marriage-plus or high-octane marriage," Mr. Huckabee, a Republican and a former Baptist minister, said in an interview before the ceremony. "I think people enter into covenant marriage not because they want a super marriage, but because they understand that marriage is fragile."

The Huckabees' ceremony was only the most prominent of a series of events organized over the Valentine's Day weekend by covenant marriage supporters who say they sense that the time is right to reinvigorate their stalled movement.

No state has adopted a covenant marriage law since Arkansas in 2001, while two dozen have considered the idea and declined to embrace it. Even in the three states where it is legal, it is not mandatory and only small numbers of couples have opted for it, somewhere from 1 percent to 2 percent, according to studies.

"Truth is, it's not been much of a movement," said Steven Mintz, co-chairman of the Council on Contemporary Families, a nonprofit organization of academics and clinicians who study family issues.

But now, after President Bush won a victory that many attribute, in part, to his championing of traditional family values, proponents of covenant marriage sense an opportunity and say they can bring to the movement the same energy that opponents of same-sex-marriage brought to outlaw it in 11 states last year.

"The numbers haven't been real high yet," said Len Munsil, president of the Center for Arizona Policy, a conservative religious group, and a strong supporter of covenant marriage. "It did stall a little bit. The debate over same-sex marriage has taken a lot of attention."

Some proponents of covenant marriage say they see the two debates as related, that fighting same-sex marriage is part of a larger effort to strengthen traditional marriage. The event Monday night, held at the Alltel Arena, site of local basketball and hockey games and the occasional concert, was billed as Arkansas's first "Celebration of Marriage." Besides the governor's renewed nuptials there were speeches from national religious leaders and songs by the gospel and pop singer CeCe Winans.

Pastors held aloft signs ("New Life Church") and friends waved to one another from across the cavernous room.

Mr. and Mrs. Huckabee, who met as children in Hope, Ark., and had three children in their three decades of marriage, the only marriage for both, had undergone the pre-ceremony counseling mandated by covenant marriage.

Running across the foot of the stage was a banner reading, "Passion transformation intimacy oneness covenant."

At one point, as the governor was telling the crowd how easy it would be to convert their marriages to covenant ones, a whistle sounded and about two dozen protesters for gay rights rose in the back of the hall, unfurling a banner reading, "Queer equality now."

Governor Huckabee ignored them, the crowd tried to cheer the governor to drown them out and the police arrived to escort them quickly from the hall.

The ceremony itself was quick and bureaucratic. The governor and his wife took the stage along with the Pulaski County clerk, Pat O'Brien.

There was no fresh recitation of the wedding vows, just three simple questions: Had they sought counseling before taking this step? Had they had the proper affidavit notarized? Did they have a copy of their marriage license and that affidavit?

"Yes," the governor said.

Mr. O'Brien reached into his jacket and said, "Well, I just happen to have a stamp here."

He clicked the affidavit once, and that was it. The audience roared to its feet.

Covenant marriage was born out of growing concern about the rise of single-parent families, especially among the poor, and unease among conservatives about no-fault divorce laws, which they say make it too easy to end a marriage.

There is also some embarrassment among religious and political leaders in the Bible Belt that many of its states, including Arkansas, have some of the nation's highest divorce rates.

"We really feel the no-fault culture has been destructive," said Dennis Rainey, president of Family Life, a Christian group based in Little Rock. "There's something wrong when it's easier to get out of a marriage than it is to get out of a contract to buy a used car."

Governor Huckabee preferred, in an interview, to emphasize the financial impact of broken homes.

"If you start adding up the various costs - the costs of child-support enforcement, additional costs in human services, how many kids will go onto food stamps - it all adds up," he said. "With that kind of money, we could pay for a lot of teachers' salaries."

The drive for covenant marriage is part of a broader movement to promote marriage and stable families. Mr. Bush, for example, has included in his new budget more than $200 million for programs that "develop innovative approaches to promote healthy marriages," and to promote "family formation and healthy marriage activities."

But a White House spokesman said the president had taken no position on covenant marriage, which he considers a state issue.
 

Jr_Bullit

I'm sooo teenie weenie!!!
Sep 8, 2001
2,028
1
North of Oz
cont'd...

While no one speaks out in favor of more divorces, there are social workers and experts on the family who wonder whether making divorce more difficult will end up hurting children of dysfunctional couples.

"It's a kind of common-sense view among many in the field that continuing dysfunction, conflict-riven marriages is not good for children," Mr. Mintz of the Council on Contemporary Families said.

The first covenant marriage law passed in Louisiana in 1997. It required county clerks to give a choice to those applying for a marriage license to select either a regular license or a covenant one.

Under the covenant, the couples express their intention to remain married for life and agree to premarital counseling from a counselor or member of the clergy, and to seek further counseling before filing for divorce. Also, they are restricted to a handful of legal grounds for divorce; adultery, felony conviction, one year of abandonment, sexual or physical abuse and separation of at least two years.

The law applies not only to those just getting married, but also to married couples who want to upgrade.

A similar law was enacted in Arizona in 1998, although that one, after lengthy legislative debate, included a provision allowing for a quicker divorce if both partners agreed to it.

The Arkansas version, passed in 2001, is similar to the Louisiana one, though it adds to the list of potential grounds for divorce such offenses as habitual drunkenness and "behavior that imposes intolerable indignities."

Steven L. Nock, a sociology professor at the University of Virginia who has been studying covenant marriage for five years, has found that those people who go through it are about a third less likely to divorce. But his studies have also shown how few people, when given the choice, are choosing it.

"People are definitely not flocking to covenant marriage," Mr. Nock said.

Explanations vary.

"We've had it here in Arizona for about six years, and it's turned out to be very little used," said Barbara Atwood, a professor of family law at the University of Arizona. "I think people are wary of entering into a relationship that might potentially have difficulties at the far, unknowable end in a way that will keep them in it longer."

Proponents of covenant marriage see it differently.

"We've had it for four years, but a lot of people are still unfamiliar with it," Governor Huckabee said. "Even some who might have been vaguely aware of it were unclear on the particulars."

Mr. Nock's research backs this up. Only 40 percent of Louisiana residents had ever heard of covenant marriage, he found, the same percentage as residents of Utah, a state that has no covenant marriage law.

So proponents of covenant marriage have recently shifted their tactics, focusing increasingly on individual pastors and congregations as well as on lawmakers.

Proponents say one goal now is to recruit as many pastors as possible who will allow only covenant marriages in their churches. That was a reason so many ministers were invited to take part in Monday night's ceremony in North Little Rock, Mr. Rainey of Family Life said.

At the same time, proponents have increasingly formed alliances with other family advocates to strengthen marriages in other ways.

According to a 2004 study by the Center for Law and Social Policy, a nonpartisan Washington group that studies family issues, 40 states have provided at least some money to provide couples with marriage-related services like premarital counseling, mostly on a pilot basis.

Nine states offer welfare recipients a financial incentive to marry. Six are training county extension agents to offer family guidance and marriage-related services. Five will reduce the marriage license fee for those who get premarital counseling.

In general, most of this activity has been in the South and the West. Governor Huckabee says that all of this is welcome, but that he still believes in a strong focus on covenant marriage.

"Personally, I don't think of this as tied to any political agenda," he said. "I think it has much more to do with recognizing that we as a society are paying a huge human price because of broken families. With the votes on same-sex marriage last year, many states have said what they are against. This is an opportunity to speak out on that which we are for."
 

Andyman_1970

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2003
3,105
5
The Natural State
Jr_Bullit said:
LITTLE ROCK, Ark., Feb. 14 - In front of more than 5,000 cheering constituents in a North Little Rock sports arena,....
A stones throw from my house................

Jr_Bullit said:
Covenant marriage was born out of growing concern about the rise of single-parent families, especially among the poor, and unease among conservatives about no-fault divorce laws, which they say make it too easy to end a marriage.
I agree.

Jr_Bullit said:
There is also some embarrassment among religious and political leaders in the Bible Belt that many of its states, including Arkansas, have some of the nation's highest divorce rates.
I believe until the church can "get it's act together" regarding it's own divorce rate, we have no business speaking out against gay marriage - I think Jesus called that being a hypocrite.
 

reflux

Turbo Monkey
Mar 18, 2002
4,617
2
G14 Classified
The covenant marriage doesn't do jack shht in order to combat the rise of broken marriages. Freakin' publicity stunts. If we start to force everyone into a covenant marriage, adultery will be the new thing, as well as "faking" abuse in order to invalidate the marriage.

I would be willing to put money on this, if gay marriage were legal, the divorce rate for that population would be much lower than that of the hetero population.
 

Andyman_1970

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2003
3,105
5
The Natural State
reflux said:
If we start to force everyone into a covenant marriage, adultery will be the new thing, as well as "faking" abuse in order to invalidate the marriage.
Notice in the article couples can choose whether to have a "normal" or "covenant" marriage.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
reflux said:
The covenant marriage doesn't do jack shht in order to combat the rise of broken marriages.
"doesn't do"? seems to me this is still in the trial balloon phase - reserve your judgment & let some more water pass under the bridge
reflux said:
Freakin' publicity stunts.
...because it's in the public's best interest
reflux said:
If we start to force everyone into a covenant marriage, adultery will be the new thing, as well as "faking" abuse in order to invalidate the marriage.
"forced"? that's a stretch; we don't have arranged marriages here
reflux said:
I would be willing to put money on this, if gay marriage were legal, the divorce rate for that population would be much lower than that of the hetero population.
then i'll have to bet the other way, seeing how there's heaps & heaps of evidence gays have more partners than straights; and seeing how infidelity is the #1 reason for splits...

sorry, but i feel compelled to undermine your best efforts to "suck-up" to the gay lobby.
 

Velocity Girl

whack-a-mole
Sep 12, 2001
1,279
0
Atlanta
I don't agree with it because they leave out one very important grounds for a divorce and that's mental abuse. Mental abuse can be on a much more subtle scale than the physcial or "such offenses as habitual drunkenness and "behavior that imposes intolerable indignities."" but cause just as much damage to an indivdual. You then get into a nightmare scenario of "he said-she said" cases. I know some think it's trying to take an easy way out, but people make mistakes, and people do change, sometimes for the worse. I don't people should have to worry about having to prove any of these allegations to get out of a damaging situation. People need to take responsibility for their actions but also do what is right for them and their families. If that means divorce than so be it, but I think judgement is sometimes passed too quickly on those who choose that alternative over a lifetime of greif.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
i was curious about what allah would say about conditional divorce:

(from islamWeb)

Q: My husband told me that I am divorced if I go to hair saloon, so can I go with letting him know. If I go am I divorced that easy?

A: [Fatwa]

All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger, may Allaah exalt his mention as well as that of his family and all his companions.

Your husband conditioned divorce on your going to the hair saloon, so if you go, divorce takes place according to the majority of the jurists, may Allaah have mercy on them, whether he intended divorce or intended something else. The matter is in your hand so you must be careful. Even if you go out with his knowledge and permission divorce still takes place, unless if he means if you go to the hair saloon without his knowledge then in this case if you go with his knowledge you are not divorced.

In principle the wife has to obey her husband in everything as long as he does not order her to disobey Allaah. What he has prevented you from could be a benefit for you in relation to your religion and worldly matters. Finally, we remind you to be cautious about anything that could cause division, divorce and the breaking up of the family.

Allaah knows best.
yes, she does!!
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,908
2,876
Pōneke
Red states have double the divorce rates of blue states.
So: Is commitment to marriage really a conservative value? No. They just like to think it is.
 

Andyman_1970

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2003
3,105
5
The Natural State
Changleen said:
Red states have double the divorce rates of blue states.
So: Is commitment to marriage really a conservative value? No. They just like to think it is.
Chang I agree with you on this one - oh crap hold on let me call Hell and see if it's frozen over.......................LOL
 

Silver

find me a tampon
Jul 20, 2002
10,840
1
Orange County, CA
There are a lot of things that are conservative values:

Divorce is bad-unless you need one because your wife found out you've been ****ing each secretary you ever had.

Abortion is bad-unless your daughter is knocked up by someone with a little bit of color that isn't yours in their skintone.

Drugs are bad-unless your kid gets caught with them, then it should be a family and not a criminal matter.

Crime is bad-unless you're insider trading or raiding pension funds...those are victimless crimes, unlike theft.

It's nothing new, Changleen and Andy...
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Changleen said:
Red states have double the divorce rates of blue states.
So: Is commitment to marriage really a conservative value? No. They just like to think it is.
link? or are you just talking out of port 22 again?
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Silver said:
There are a lot of things that are conservative values:

Divorce is bad-unless you need one because your wife found out you've been ****ing each secretary you ever had.

Abortion is bad-unless your daughter is knocked up by someone with a little bit of color that isn't yours in their skintone.

Drugs are bad-unless your kid gets caught with them, then it should be a family and not a criminal matter.

Crime is bad-unless you're insider trading or raiding pension funds...those are victimless crimes, unlike theft.

It's nothing new, Changleen and Andy...
you forgot: gossip, rage-a-holics & pettiness.......maybe i'm being petty now. Can i join the club?
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
the MA vs TX was a nice setup of cherry picked extremes; which as your link pointed out were not representative samples.

3 is 50% more than 2, but 3 is not double of 2.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
and another thing...

CA data is curiously missing from this 2001 opinion piece; so i did some digging at an abstract page of census bureau vital stats. Turns out, CA is off the chart for divorce, with 128 per 1,000, compared to TX (the next closest) at 94 [for 1990, the last year of available data for CA] ** edit ** [schiet! divorce as a raw number, not a rate]

so, to play the "stats game", CA's 1990 divorce rate ** edit ** raw value is 36% higher than that of TX. One could argue CA is an abberation, but being the most populous state, that's a stretch, don'tchathink?

wanna talk about out-of-wedlock births for red vs blue states (reds have more)? wanna take it to the next logical step of abortion in red vs blue (blues have more)?
 

kinghami3

Future Turbo Monkey
Jun 1, 2004
2,239
0
Ballard 4 life.
I can't believe the state that marriage is in; it's terrible, and it's also the reason I don't really have a problem with gay marriage anymore. Contrary to popular belief, both inside and outside the church, once the vows are said, there is no going back. Doesn't matter if you don't like the situation, you made the choice. Unfortunately, there are cases of physical, mental, and sexual abuse where I do believe that a divorce is the right option. Even more unfortunately it's subjective. All of this is coming from someone who isn't even married yet, so I'll have to wait a couple years and get back to you when I am. Oh, and by the way I am quite liberal, so in other words it's not just a conservative issue.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
palabra!

marriage is a personal decision, & when it "dissolves" there's no blaming society, domestic policy, economy, no-fault laws, etc.

having been previously dumped, i rest the blame at the feet of that selfish, spoiled, slattern. important thing is i'm not bitter.
 

MikeD

Leader and Demogogue of the Ridemonkey Satinists
Oct 26, 2001
11,737
1,820
chez moi
Yes, doctor, he stopped screaming in pain once we gave him morphine, so he must not have that gaping wound anymore. Right?

MD
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,908
2,876
Pōneke
$tinkle said:
marriage is a personal decision, & when it "dissolves" there's no blaming society, domestic policy, economy, no-fault laws, etc.
Almost agree with you. Whilst I agree it's 99% personal responsibility there is definately an element of education to be blamed (in a lot of cases) for which you can thank right wing christian schools and prime time TV, a dangerous combination if ever there was one.
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,908
2,876
Pōneke
$tinkle said:
and another thing...

CA data is curiously missing from this 2001 opinion piece; so i did some digging at an abstract page of census bureau vital stats. Turns out, CA is off the chart for divorce, with 128 per 1,000, compared to TX (the next closest) at 94 [for 1990, the last year of available data for CA] ** edit ** [schiet! divorce as a raw number, not a rate]

so, to play the "stats game", CA's 1990 divorce rate ** edit ** raw value is 36% higher than that of TX. One could argue CA is an abberation, but being the most populous state, that's a stretch, don'tchathink?

wanna talk about out-of-wedlock births for red vs blue states (reds have more)? wanna take it to the next logical step of abortion in red vs blue (blues have more)?
Yeah but Cali has Movie stars (and wannabe movie stars) living there, of course the divorce rate is higher. :) If you don't get maried and divorced at least 5 times in Cali you're not living the dream.

More intersting is the wedlock vs. abortion thing - I personally have no problems with abortion, and also find it indicative of the false morality of the reds that they'd rather bring a child into the world as an unplanned mistake with all the issues that can bring (poor financial provision, maybe lack of one parent, lack of decent facilities, other really nasty ****) than a blue who takes a responsible attitude to when it's right for him/her/them to have a kid - when they're ready for it as a part of their lives and ready to give it the support and attention it needs. This isn't the third world ffs.
 

Andyman_1970

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2003
3,105
5
The Natural State
$tinkle said:
marriage is a personal decision, & when it "dissolves" there's no blaming society, domestic policy, economy, no-fault laws, etc.
I agree with you $tink - I have one comment though regarding Christians and our divorce rate. If "our" divorce rate is as high or higher than non-Christians then what is that is influencing the Christian culture that produces this rate? If people who say they are Christians would actually live it out, I would argue this divorce rate we have would not be the case, however it is obvious we (collectively) are not. So what is the influence on Christian culture in the US - something has to be shaping these peoples way of life to produce this divorce rate. Granted marriage is a personal decision, but out views on it are shaped by our environment.........would you agree?

Anyway, I hope that made sense.........
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Changleen said:
More intersting is the wedlock vs. abortion thing - I personally have no problems with abortion, and also find it indicative of the false morality of the reds that they'd rather bring a child into the world as an unplanned mistake with all the issues that can bring (poor financial provision, maybe lack of one parent, lack of decent facilities, other really nasty ****) than a blue who takes a responsible attitude to when it's right for him/her/them to have a kid - when they're ready for it as a part of their lives and ready to give it the support and attention it needs. This isn't the third world ffs.
dont' want to bring a child into a poor, one parent household, then he might be president one day (bill clinton). We should bring up a kid in a rich, 2 parent household, like paris hilton.

you & your ilk keep devaluing human life & towing the margaret sanger line: "Whereas the great majority of mothers realize the grave responsibility they face in keeping alive and rearing the children they have already brought into the world, the maternity center would teach them how to have more. The poor woman is taught how to have her seventh child, when what she wants to know is how to avoid bringing into the world her eighth. Such philanthropy, as Dean Inge has so unanswerably pointed out, is kind only to be cruel, and unwittingly promotes precisely the results most deprecated. It encourages the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant." Maragert Sanger [founder of planned parenthood], The Pivot of Civilization
 

Jr_Bullit

I'm sooo teenie weenie!!!
Sep 8, 2001
2,028
1
North of Oz
$tinkle said:
dont' want to bring a child into a poor, one parent household, then he might be president one day (bill clinton). We should bring up a kid in a rich, 2 parent household, like paris hilton.

you & your ilk keep devaluing human life & towing the margaret sanger line:
Y'know, we all know of stories of people who made a choice and had a child and raised it successfully. We also all know of stories where a woman or man brought a child into the world just to give it a miserable life.

Don't degrade those who wish to think through their decisions by saying they lower the value on human life.

Some women are strong enough to raise a child, alone, and in poverty and bring about a great person. Others tie their kids to bedposts so they can go play on the town one night.

These statistics mean little in the case of abortion, however, I don't believe we should limit a person's right to choose what the right future is for them. We have a planet that is heavily populated, with people living long healthy lives, and able to support and provide for their families without "needing" children. Thus, we have the luxury of choice.

Marriage - seems to me one of those things where a long courtship, or true knowledge of the other person (maybe a really long friendship that changes) is appropriate before diving in. People jump into marriage flippantly, and then jump back out, and devise illegitimate reasons for it. Rather see marriage and families strengthened by people who took their time and didn't rush into things before knowing one another. I can't honestly think a rational person would disagree with that ideal.
 

Damn True

Monkey Pimp
Sep 10, 2001
4,015
3
Between a rock and a hard place.
Velocity Girl said:
I don't agree with it because they leave out one very important grounds for a divorce and that's mental abuse. Mental abuse can be on a much more subtle scale than the physcial or "such offenses as habitual drunkenness and "behavior that imposes intolerable indignities."" but cause just as much damage to an indivdual. You then get into a nightmare scenario of "he said-she said" cases. I know some think it's trying to take an easy way out, but people make mistakes, and people do change, sometimes for the worse. I don't people should have to worry about having to prove any of these allegations to get out of a damaging situation. People need to take responsibility for their actions but also do what is right for them and their families. If that means divorce than so be it, but I think judgement is sometimes passed too quickly on those who choose that alternative over a lifetime of greif.
Agreed.
And, having experienced it, a spouses infidelity is a proufound form of mental abuse. I can think of few acts as damaging to a psyche ("behavior that imposes intolerable indignities."" ) as having a loved one forsake you for another.
 

Damn True

Monkey Pimp
Sep 10, 2001
4,015
3
Between a rock and a hard place.
Changleen said:
Yeah but Cali has Movie stars (and wannabe movie stars) living there, of course the divorce rate is higher. :) If you don't get maried and divorced at least 5 times in Cali you're not living the dream.

More intersting is the wedlock vs. abortion thing - I personally have no problems with abortion, and also find it indicative of the false morality of the reds that they'd rather bring a child into the world as an unplanned mistake with all the issues that can bring (poor financial provision, maybe lack of one parent, lack of decent facilities, other really nasty ****) than a blue who takes a responsible attitude to when it's right for him/her/them to have a kid - when they're ready for it as a part of their lives and ready to give it the support and attention it needs. This isn't the third world ffs.
By your logic, had my folks taken a "responsible attitude" my folks would have aborted me.

Pretty glad to be a living unplanned mistake.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Jr_Bullit said:
Don't degrade those who wish to think through their decisions by saying they lower the value on human life.
point wasn't to degrade those who think things through, but quite the opposite. chang posts like a man in love: devoid of all reason & ration, just following his d!ck. Surely, you've had the misfortune to interact & even date such a creature. Accept apologies on behalf of our species.
Jr_Bullit said:
Marriage - seems to me one of those things where a long courtship, or true knowledge of the other person (maybe a really long friendship that changes) is appropriate before diving in. People jump into marriage flippantly, and then jump back out, and devise illegitimate reasons for it. Rather see marriage and families strengthened by people who took their time and didn't rush into things before knowing one another. I can't honestly think a rational person would disagree with that ideal.
perhaps what's been suggested here should now be law: a test for rationale before getting a license to marry?