Quantcast

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
I want the execs to eat **** as much as you do, but there are also a lot of retired people who need the pensions that they get to be economically secure.
If our sole motivator is protecting pensions, then the most efficient thing is to go straight to the source and ONLY bail out the pensions. Let GM collapse and then take on the pensions during the Chap 9/breakup.

Feeding the abusive owner to save the dog is a huge waste of money.
 

Defenestrated

Turbo Monkey
Mar 28, 2007
1,657
0
Earth
If our sole motivator is protecting pensions, then the most efficient thing is to go straight to the source and ONLY bail out the pensions. Let GM collapse and then take on the pensions during the Chap 9/breakup.

Feeding the abusive owner to save the dog is a huge waste of money.
Socialism for the working class will be called socialism.

Socialism for the elites will be called a 'bailout'.

and Americans wont support anything labeled as socialism...
 

Transcend

My Nuts Are Flat
Apr 18, 2002
18,040
3
Towing the party line.
actually the estimated price was only $20k roundtrip, when first class tickets to DC would have only cost $837.
hey, if you got the money.....oh wait, they dont
That is estimated cost for the trip. ie: crew/fuel. This doesn't include cost of the jet, maintenance, airport fees, hanger fees, ground services fees. They like to hide those costs.

I have a few friends who work in the civil aviation field for large corporate jets these guys all fly on (not the smaller 6-8 seat models). The costs of 1 days worth of operation is staggering.

But either way you look at it, they spent orders of magnitude too much money on it. They really do not get it.
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
onesky.com has prices ranging from $2000-$7400 per HOUR for a private jet from Detroit to DC.
Continental has first class tix from $1000 and up for a flight tomorrow.

so lets say 2 hour trip each way from...4 hours at $7400 for a G4 for 1 person...$29,600.
i guess im not a big enough share holder to tell them to fck off
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
If our sole motivator is protecting pensions, then the most efficient thing is to go straight to the source and ONLY bail out the pensions. Let GM collapse and then take on the pensions during the Chap 9/breakup.

Feeding the abusive owner to save the dog is a huge waste of money.
Somebody didn't watch their educational videos on the dangers of socialism :p
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
If our sole motivator is protecting pensions, then the most efficient thing is to go straight to the source and ONLY bail out the pensions. Let GM collapse and then take on the pensions during the Chap 9/breakup.

Feeding the abusive owner to save the dog is a huge waste of money.
what i was thinking is liquidate all the assets & payout the pension as a lump. this way, you avoid endless litigation (charged against the pool of gm's assets), and there's much needed closure.

our company did this when they went away w/ a pension program in favor of increasing 401(k) matching
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
what i was thinking is liquidate all the assets & payout the pension as a lump. this way, you avoid endless litigation (charged against the pool of gm's assets), and there's much needed closure.
if they file Chapter 11 would they still be responsible for paying out pensions? or would they have to file Chapter 7?
 

Defenestrated

Turbo Monkey
Mar 28, 2007
1,657
0
Earth
and announced that they didn't support the compromise bill and that CEOs of the Big 3 would have to come back after the Thanksgiving holiday and present a plan on how any loans that might be given would be used.
:clapping:
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
true that....they are just delaying the inevitable im afraid...the government that is...they are gonna bail them out, cause thats what we do.
Im sure Obama doesnt want to take over with $50bil+ outa the economy and millions of lost jobs on the table....but he doesnt have a say in what is being done now......or does he?
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
Im sure Obama doesnt want to take over with $50bil+ outa the economy and millions of lost jobs on the table....but he doesnt have a say in what is being done now......or does he?
It depends what he wants to use his political capital on, bailouts or healthcare
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
cause $50bil in lost economy and millions of lost jobs isnt big eh?.

i mean he's still technically a senator, but i dont think he has any power on making decisions as a president until january.
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
cause $50bil in lost economy and millions of lost jobs isnt big eh?.

i mean he's still technically a senator, but i dont think he has any power on making decisions as a president until january.
National healthcare will solve a lot of the problems that the Big Three are having, but he has influence because he won a lot electorally, and the democrats won overwhelmingly in the Senate and House.

I didn't meant to trivialize the bailout, but there are bigger things out there he could use his influence on.
 

SkaredShtles

Michael Bolton
Sep 21, 2003
67,674
14,076
In a van.... down by the river
Wait a sec, don't you have a US Honda Odyssey :busted:
It just goes to show you that it's not specifically the U.S. assemblers and suppliers that suck...

Even you like bloated oversized vehicles.
The mileage on our Odyssey sucks donkey balls. But I have to say that with 3 rugrats it's awfully nice on a cross country vacation with the grandma. :monkeydance:

It's a fuggin' PITA to get them in the Subaru...
Honda makes a much better Odyssey for the rest of the world:

I'd bet that gets pretty damn good mileage, doesn't it? :disgust1:
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
how is national healthcare going to solve 3 giant companies from going under?
Well, it probably won't help too much right away, but if we do bail them out and somehow they get back on their feet, having national healthcare greatly reduces costs, since GM won't have to pay for it
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
Well, it probably won't help too much right away, but if we do bail them out and somehow they get back on their feet, having national healthcare greatly reduces costs, since GM won't have to pay for it
paying out employee benefits isnt why the Big Three are hurting.

the shtty products are the culprit
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
paying out employee benefits isnt why the Big Three are hurting.

the shtty products are the culprit
Actually employee are a large part of it since quality has reached parity with Europe (still lags behind Asia) .

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2134086/posts

(CNSNews.com) – Economists in Michigan, the long-time home of the auto industry, say they don’t support the proposed multi-billion dollar bailout of Big Three automakers Chrysler, GM and Ford.

One reason why, they say, is the ultra-high labor costs for union workers employed by the Big Three. It costs over $73 per hour on average to employ a union auto worker, according to University of Michigan at Flint economist Mark J. Perry.

“Is it right to tax the average worker making $28.50 to bailout workers whose labor cost is over $73 an hour?” Perry asked.

He explained that in 2006, widely available industry and Labor Department statistics placed the average labor cost for UAW-represented workers at the former DaimlerChrysler at $75.86 per hour. For Ford it was $70.51, he said, and for General Motors it was $73.26.

“That includes the hourly pay, plus the benefits they’re receiving and all the other costs to General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, including legacy costs – retirement costs, pensions, and so on – so it’s looking at the total labor costs per hour worked for workers,” Perry said.

For U.S. workers at Toyota, however, the per hour labor cost is around $47.60, around $43 for Honda and around $42 for Nissan, Perry added, for an average of around $44.

“So we’re looking at somewhere around a $29 per hour pay gap between the Big Three and the foreign transplants that are producing cars in the United States,” Perry, chairman of the economics department, told CNSNews.com.

The average union worker at Chrysler, meanwhile, received 150 percent more in compensation than U.S. workers generally.

“Using Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers, the average compensation for manufacturing workers is around $31.50, and the average hourly compensation, including benefits, for the average worker in the U.S. economy is around $28.50,” Perry told CNSNews.com.
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
One of the biggest costs isn't labor, it is paying for healthcare and pensions. Management has a monopoly on capital, and unions have a monopoly on labor, and it creates a balance, only when labor is divided is it able to be conquered, as we see in other factories.

I didn't mean to imply that their cars weren't ****ty, but that single-payer healthcare would help a whole lot.
 

SkaredShtles

Michael Bolton
Sep 21, 2003
67,674
14,076
In a van.... down by the river
One of the biggest costs isn't labor, it is paying for healthcare and pensions. Management has a monopoly on capital, and unions have a monopoly on labor, and it creates a balance, only when labor is divided is it able to be conquered, as we see in other factories.

I didn't mean to imply that their cars weren't ****ty, but that single-payer healthcare would help a whole lot.
So what does Toyota do over here? I'm curious? Do they have really $hitty healthcare plans for their assemblers?
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
So what does Toyota do over here? I'm curious? Do they have really $hitty healthcare plans for their assemblers?
Toyota doesn't have a lot of retirees they are paying health care for and the Big Three don't have pharmacies in the workplace like Toyota does.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
yeah **** unions for getting companies to provide healthcare for their labor force!
i work for a fortune 500 company w/ a third of a million employees, and is almost half a century old. so how did i swing my awesome healthcare & 100% 401(k) matching up to 6% of my competitive base pay?

last i checked, i'm not out any union dues.
 

blue

boob hater
Jan 24, 2004
10,160
2
california
So what does Toyota do over here? I'm curious? Do they have really $hitty healthcare plans for their assemblers?
Toyota hasn't been in-country long enough.

I'm very pro-union, and I think the UAW stinks almost as much as GM management. They've both been completely incapable to adapt to change, and they're both to blame for GM going down the tubes.

It's quite sad, as GM is finally building a decent product.