Andyman_1970 said:It depends on who you ask.
Obviously I vote no................LOL
Penn Jillette says it all the time...N8 said:I heard this line in a movie I was watching on HBO high def tonite called The Big Bounce... I considered it as a signature line...
But, yeah... I think a LOT of peeps treat god as nothing more than an invisible friend... or even less than that.
Thanks for being sensitive and all, but feel free and make your witty response, don't censor yourself on my account.LordOpie said:great, Andy's here. Well, there goes my witty and hellbound response out of respect for him. Him being Andy. Not HIM. Oh wait, there it is.
I think you're right, or they treat Him like a cosmic vending machine <cough> Charismaic Word of Faith'ers <cough>N8 said:But, yeah... I think a LOT of peeps treat god as nothing more than an invisible friend... or even less than that.
He's not a beared dude sitting on a cloud with a hand full of lightning bolts waiting to "zap" people - I don't believe in that god either..............fluff said:Inivisible friend? Invisible adversary in some cases....
How many gods do you not believe in? I have a list that probably runs into three figures.Andyman_1970 said:He's not a beared dude sitting on a cloud with a hand full of lightning bolts waiting to "zap" people - I don't believe in that God either..............
So does my list of gods I don't believe in..............fluff said:I have a list that probably runs into three figures.
And His Name (His Shem) is spelled Y-H-W-H.............LordOpie said:There is only one Lord.
I bet you say that in the bedroom as often as you can eh?LordOpie said:There is only one Lord.
i think the nekid part is the "genesis" of man's fallenness, no?fluff said:Invisible: Cannot be seen with the naked eye (in the commonly accepted range of frequencies)?
Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked
I guess the tree of knowledge included a dictionary branch because suddenly they needed some new terms for all the new knowledge.$tinkle said:i think the nekid part is the "genesis" of man's fallenness, no?
gen 3:7
Atheist Activists Look to Future During Easter Convention
The future of atheism was particularly on the minds of two speakers who addressed the gathering of "First Amendment activists" on Saturday.
The first of these was Larry Beinhart, who is best known as the author of the novel "Wag the Dog," which was made into the movie of the same name.
Beinhart started his speech by stating that "the idea of a God is kind of ridiculous," a notion that led him to ask such questions as "If we're so smart, why aren't we rich?" and "If we're so right, why doesn't anybody agree with us?"
He added that he considers religion "psychotic" and called it "the search for meaning gone mad" in a vast, indifferent universe, though he acknowledged people spend most of their lives "figuring out how the world works."
Beinhart said he agreed with Karl Marx that "religion is the opiate of the masses," though he observed that for most people, its effect is "between opium and prozac, and for a lucky few, it's LSD."
However, the author noted that because religious persons have a world view that makes sense to them, they "live longer, they're healthier, and everything else works better. So even if it's delusional, even if it's wrong, it's functional. And ultimately, we have to think about that and respect that." (unless you're changleen)
Beinhart then stated he believes atheists have become trapped in an argument from the last century. "Saying there is no God is a dead end," he added. "The concept of God is offering people something they want. Why do they want it, and what can we offer in its place?"
The writer added that he believes religion can't be repressed or stamped out. "Just look how many people are in here," he said to the audience in the room, "and how many people are out there."
Noting that something in religion "makes sense either for the people doing it or for their relationship to the world or both," Beinhart insisted: "We've got to figure out what that is and separate it from the delusional parts. We've got to get past this God stuff."
Nice addition...........LOLHowever, the author noted that because religious persons have a world view that makes sense to them, they "live longer, they're healthier, and everything else works better. So even if it's delusional, even if it's wrong, it's functional. And ultimately, we have to think about that and respect that." (unless you're changleen)
I'm a three Stooges fan too!Andyman_1970 said:And His Name (His Shemp )
My world view makes perfect sense to me thanks. I have low blood pressure, low cholesterol and am very happy and healthy. And you know what I think about your concept of 'god'.$tinkle said:However, the author noted that because religious persons have a world view that makes sense to them, they "live longer, they're healthier, and everything else works better. So even if it's delusional, even if it's wrong, it's functional. And ultimately, we have to think about that and respect that." (unless you're changleen)
A dog can't see a rainbow, does a dog know they are there?fluff said:Invisible: Cannot be seen with the naked eye (in the commonly accepted range of frequencies)?
Some people may say that they know God exists, they see his effect, etc.Jr_Bullit said:A dog can't see a rainbow, does a dog know they are there?
We can't see time - but we know it passes...
We can't see gravity, but they're studying to see if it "is" a particle that can be detected and we can feel it's effects
We can't see that thing that we feel is there, that we "need" to believe in, so we attach human level names to it and build organizations around it to exploit people's naked desire to understand...
Would you bother looking up if you could lick your balls?fluff said:How do you know that dogs can't see rainbows? Do they never look up?
I didn't say that a dog doesn't know rainbows exist. I do know dogs can't see color in the way humans do. My point was, there is no way to know if a dog can't sense a rainbow. There is no way to know if man really senses "god" or if we suffer from mass delusion throughout the world at the fear that we really are all alone and no different from any other organism made of the flesh of the earth.fluff said:Some people may say that they know God exists, they see his effect, etc.
How do you know that dogs can't see rainbows? Do they never look up?
Mna, why do yuo thnik my tpying is so bda?LordOpie said:Would you bother looking up if you could lick your balls?
I guess he just doesn't want them to thrive...Andyman_1970 said:Another God thread that totally went down the tubes............
does the feeding tube going down the pope's nose come close?Andyman_1970 said:Another God thread that totally went down the tubes............
Hold on let me check my rule book.............$tinkle said:does the feeding tube going down the pope's nose come close?
to the untrained eye, this looks like your first attempt at trolling.Jr_Bullit said:Andyman - why must every post about god be serious? Why does this one qualify as "going down the tubes"?
Because it's not a ripe breeding ground for long theological posts?
Considering I don't generally "troll" as you put it, and that I have no idea what you mean by "helping a frother out", I guess you might have to settle for the explanation that I was, actually, curious.$tinkle said:to the untrained eye, this looks like your first attempt at trolling.
but i know you're just trying to help a brother out.
Looks like a 'b' to me...Jr_Bullit said:Considering I don't generally "troll" as you put it, and that I have no idea what you mean by "helping a frother out", I guess you might have to settle for the explanation that I was, actually, curious.