brutal despite the editing.Wow!
The thought that he is still editing his thoughts as he is speaking in public is a bit scary.
also, kinda crazy that he called it (derpstrong = fraud) over a decade ago
brutal despite the editing.Wow!
The thought that he is still editing his thoughts as he is speaking in public is a bit scary.
You gotta call a spade, a spade sometimes. He called Lance a fraud over a decade ago, the logical extension of that makes everything he (lance) was attached to fraudulent.kinda crazy that he called it (derpstrong = fraud) over a decade ago
Who cares...let him stew in his dishonesty. Fvcktard charlatan that he is...i wonder what rock derpstrong has crawled under these days
I dunno man, Lanth's ego is way too huge to be affected by such trivial allegations. That or he's a sociopath who has zero guilt for his actions.Who cares...let him stew in his dishonesty. Fvcktard charlatan that he is...
he is Both, yet now nothingI dunno man, Lanth's ego is way too huge to be affected by such trivial allegations. That or he's a sociopath who has zero guilt for his actions.
personally, i think he's a sith lordI dunno man, Lanth's ego is way too huge to be affected by such trivial allegations. That or he's a sociopath who has zero guilt for his actions.
Private investigators removed IT equipment, including Pat McQuaid’s laptop, from UCI headquarters in Aigle, Switzerland, minutes after the Irishman lost his bid for a third term atop cycling’s international governing body, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday. According to the Times, staff from the Kroll firm, working for newly elected president Brian Cookson, entered the headquarters on Sept. 27 and removed computers and documents to be reviewed in an investigation over corruption charges against the Irishman.
impossibru!Now watch Lance get exonerated...yeah, like thats going to happen!
DB: When did you realise that the UCI didn’t give a ****?
LA: I don’t know if they didn’t give a **** or if they just couldn’t, honestly, and I don’t think highly of Pat [McQuaid] or Hein [Verbruggen] today, but what were they going to do? Imagine you’re Hein, and again I’m not defending him, but take yourself to '94 or maybe even '93 or before. He should have known before because high-octane existed in the late '80s and not just in cycling, in other endurance sports. You’re there, you’re the head of the governing body, you’ve got no test, no test at all – what are you going to do? And again, I know those guys are easy to pick on, but it’s 1995 for example, you’re Hein Verbruggen. What the **** are you going to do? Hope someone gets caught at a border? There’s nothing you can do. Maybe they didn’t give a ****, I didn’t ask them, but I do know that they could not do a thing. Just like the head of the IAAF couldn’t do a thing, just like the head of FINA couldn’t do a thing. They just did not have the tools to do anything until maybe 10 years later.
DB: But do you not think they didn’t have even the will?
LA: If they had the scientific data to protect them legally, then yeah, but again I don’t know. Ultimately we end up where we are today where we have a test that works for one compound [EPO] and guys have to decide if they want to dance around that. I’d like to think that there’s a lot less risk taking. But at the time they could only test for what they had a test for. I don’t think it’s right or responsible, and again I’m not defending them because I don’t really care for them, but cycling tried with some pressure to implement things that were just band-aids over the course of time. Whether it was just the 50 per cent rule, which was what it was – it wasn’t perfect but it was a step. But the sport got no credit for it. That led to more things like the off-score, which led to the biological passport and all the while, no credit. And every other sport that has the doping problem is sitting back and laughing, laughing their asses off, getting no attention, no criticism, no exposure and not doing a ****ing thing.
DB: Okay, well what do you put that down to?
LA: Well cycling, the Tour is bigger than some cross country race, even the New York City Marathon. It’s bigger than those things.
DB: Okay, but it’s not as big as the World Cup in soccer or the Super Bowl.
LA: Well listen, the biggest difference between cycling, football and tennis is the players’ union, an athletes’ union. We have no voice, no unity. There are guys all over the place. Those sports, major league sports, they’re not letting that happen and the owners wouldn’t allow it to happen. Whereas we’ve just been living in the Wild West. The riders have no rights, ASO continues to make millions, the teams don’t own anything. The only thing a team owns is its current contract, and when that’s up you’re ****ing done. You might have a couple of buses and a truck. There’s no equity and value. It’s a ****ed up business model.
I think Football get's quite a bit of attention on doping. But they also make sure to suspend a few guys a year for positive tests, so in the public eye they look like they are doing their job.He also missed the point football and tennis skill is a bigger factor and in the public eye it may be the only factor while the public thinks cycling is pure fitness so yes doping will always get more attention in endurance sports.
DB: I watched the Oprah interview and what I want to know is whether you’re sorry you got caught or if you’re sorry for what you did?
LA: Maybe both. It was a perfect storm at the time back then. You had things going on that were incredibly beneficial and if you didn’t make that decision [doping] you went home. Now the debate will be how many people went home. I don’t know. Everyone I knew stayed. So we all make our own decisions for ourselves. To answer your question it was an unfortunate set of circumstances that all of us were put into. This is where Travis [Tygart] is lying about protecting the rights of clean athletes. I love it and believe it but in 2013. Back then, it doesn’t hold water because there were none. So while I support him on that today, back then you’re not protecting anyone.
coincidentally verbruggen just announced that he's "stepping away from involvements in sports"
In normal Lance fashion he is capitalizing on this and has partner up to produce thisThis just in, Lance is still a douche.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/cycling/2014/06/06/lance-armstrong-depositions-usps-lawsuit-motion-to-quash/10047445/According to the government's case, the USPS would not have paid the sponsorship if it had known Armstrong and his teammates were doping. The government claims an exact amount of damages since June 10, 2000: $32,321,821.94 – a sum the government seeks to triple under the False Claims Act.
A quick google says his net worth is in the $125 million range. The Uniballer will probably still be a millionaire after all this. If he had more sense than ego, he'd just fucking disappear along with his cash.
Well that is clearly not the case.If he had more sense than ego, he'd just fucking disappear along with his cash.
i'm waiting to see how much the feds go after him for.I'm sure he spent quite a bit of money on lawyers. Pretty sure this isn't his only law suit either. He ain't gonna be broke but he certainly isn't going to be as rich.
He threatened and bullied so many people with his lawyers. Do we need an Irony check if he ends up getting sued into the poor house?i'm waiting to see how much the feds go after him for.
his primary defense so far (re: USPS and exposure) seems to be "the ends justify the means"He threatened and bullied so many people with his lawyers. Do we need an Irony check if he ends up getting sued into the poor house?