Eat more.I've worked out for 20 years and my arms are only 16 inches.
That's all.
Eat more.I've worked out for 20 years and my arms are only 16 inches.
to a point yes, but there's also your bodies own genetic limitations.Eat more.
That's all.
Bonds is an idiot, he should have fessed up to it like Giambi did.Not true.
This is all coming up in a Federal investigation, not a SI article.
The Feds are going after Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, and even if they get off, their reputations are ruined as well as their pocketbooks.
But I think the case against Lance is much stronger than Bonds because all of his associates are testifying. Bonds' trainer has kept his mouth shut and has done months in jail for contempt of court.
lol that's because humans aren't supposed to be 5'10" 300lb and built like a brick. No one makes those kind of numbers without the juice.I have a friend 5-10, 275, bodybuilder, he dopes, he struggles to get over 300lbs even with the help of dope and an incredible appetite for food.
It was on a drunken bet. Zap told Lance that if he could fit his ball through his gaping earlobe, he would come back to work for Trek.
Lance won as always.
Yes I know this, my point was even on a steady diet of the needle and the roidz and incredible amounts of food everyday he is unable to get over 300lbs very easily.lol that's because humans aren't supposed to be 5'10" 300lb and built like a brick. No one makes those kind of numbers without the juice.
Curious if he will so cocky when the Feds, who have subpoena power, complete their investigation...The Lance Speaks said:"Great to hear that USADA is investigating some of SI's claims. I look forward to being vindicated."
A 16-inch bicep is pretty unlikely to be at the genetic limit for anyone.Everyone has a genetic limit, no matter how much food you eat, you can only build so much muscle. Sure, you can get to 500lbs by eating more, but I think the point is to try and stay somewhat lean in the process.
LMAO!
it could be for me lolA 16-inch bicep is pretty unlikely to be at the genetic limit for anyone.
He's gonna be one tough nut to crack though....The media does seem to have a very singular focus, don't they?
sorry, dude....You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to IH8Rice again.
Except you cant have both. You're either doing 500lbs and you look like grizzly bear or your lean/cut doing half of that.Yes I know this, my point was even on a steady diet of the needle and the roidz and incredible amounts of food everyday he is unable to get over 300lbs very easily.
Everyone has a genetic limit, no matter how much food you eat, you can only build so much muscle. Sure, you can get to 500lbs by eating more, but I think the point is to try and stay somewhat lean in the process.
Any personal suggestions? Dianabol? Anavar? Andro?Eat more.
That's all.
DUMBASS: pronounced: un-edge-jew-ma-cated dum-as/ definition: (see above video)
Is he back as someone else, or did he just leave? On a somewhat related note while searching for BIGHITR, I was amazed how many "members" there are with zero posts.Gawd was BIGHITR a effing wierdo.
permabanned.Is he back as someone else, or did he just leave? On a somewhat related note while searching for BIGHITR, I was amazed how many "members" there are with zero posts.
why?I feel bummed out for armstrong- I think someone asked why go after the winners only. I would guess that if you make an example out of the one that is benefitting the most from it, you'll discourage doping (or simply increase the sophistication of the trade).
Yes but how could you tell it was Bighitr instead of one of the many other people with two Kingfishers, a Charlie Sheen obsession and a victim complex.permabanned.
why?
.
I could agree with that. Cycling's version of the All-Drug Olympics.Back OT - Revoking LA tour victories would be silly since there is no one to give them to who hasn't been similarly charged. You might as well put an asterisk by them and label him the fastest of the dopers. I'm sure ten time tour winner Greg Lemond has a different idea.
Or baseball stats.I could agree with that. Cycling's version of the All-Drug Olympics.
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/update-all-drug-olympics/1198068
I'd go with HGH-larious, personally...That would be HIGH-larious if Lance went to jail
The government dropped its investigation. Maybe they could pick it up again?So will this turn into a big legal deal like the baseball doping stuff where all the baseball Dopey Dopertons were facing jail time for lying to the grand jury.....or something?
That would be HIGH-larious if Lance went to jail
I am the walrus?"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
yea, i recognize that there's a gray area, but its somewhat of a technicality. that area resides between what the WADA/UCI is aware of and has banned, and the new PED's they're not yet aware of / haven't developed a reliable test for. It's like computer hackers, those looking to game the system are always going to be a few steps ahead of those writing the rules. Just because a substance isn't banned (yet) doesn't mean its not doping/cheating.I think the there is the question of what is gray area/technically not cheating, also the norm within the sport, etc. I don't condone it, but it appears that most are somewhere are on the continuum, much like body builders. The movie Bigger, Stronger, Faster definately makes it less black and whate (for me at least) Good movie, anyway.