Not sure why it bothers me, but I just don't see any purpose in Nike pulling out now. Twenty years from now, no one is going to disassociate the two at all. You could probably ask a toddler in Jordan's who made them and they'd say Lance.He's stood down as chairman of Livestrong too.
Cheaters never prosper, unless they win 7 titles before being caught and stuff.And Nike ends their sponsorship. He made 21 million in 2012 - wow doping really pays off
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-17/nike-ends-contract-with-lance-armstrong-amid-doping-allegations.html
All the the time he has been laughing all the way to the blood bank.
It will be interesting to see if other sponsors will follow. I wonder if they could damn he pay back to money earned if his contract states doping is not legal.
"The company will also take Armstrong's name off of the fitness center on Nike's campus in Oregon, according to KeJuan Wilkins, a spokesperson for the athletic gear maker."You expected them to rename a whole building at the world campus or something?
The World Campus is 2 miles from my house. This has been all over the news last night and this morning."The company will also take Armstrong's name off of the fitness center on Nike's campus in Oregon, according to KeJuan Wilkins, a spokesperson for the athletic gear maker."
http://money.cnn.com/2012/10/17/news/companies/nike-lance-armstrong/index.html?iid=HP_LN&hpt=hp_t1
Gary Osgood, a 32-year-old sales account executive, and the only person in the world who did not react to the news that Armstrong would be stripped of his seven Tour de France titles with a shrug of his shoulders and a knowing nod, told reporters he was devastated by the story.
Saying he felt “truly let down” by Armstrong, Osgood expressed a sense of anger and frustration that more than 300 million U.S. residents had already experienced and come to terms with at least three years ago.
http://www.mercurynews.com/other-sports/ci_21789530/local-sports-digest-cyclist-levi-leipheimer-dropped-byCyclist Levi Leipheimer of Santa Rosa has been dropped from the Omega Pharma-Quick-Step Cycling team because of his admission to taking performance-enhancing drugs, team officials announced Tuesday.
It is the latest fallout in the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency case against cycling icon Lance Armstrong, who won an unprecedented seven Tour de France titles. The anti-doping agency last week released a 1,000-page report of its investigation into Armstrong, who has denied virtually every drug allocation leveled against him over the past decade.
Eleven former Armstrong teammates including Leipheimer gave damning testimony to anti-doping agency investigators. Leipheimer admitted to using drugs between 1999 and 2007 while riding for Saturn, U.S. Postal Service, Rabobank, Gerolsteiner and Astana
I don't think he will, look at Sandusky.Wondering how long/how much til he comes clean...who will get the interveiw.
that's typically when you regret not pulling out.Not sure why it bothers me, but I just don't see any purpose in Nike pulling out now. Twenty years from now, no one is going to disassociate the two at all. You could probably ask a toddler in Jordan's who made them and they'd say Lance.
He won two previous lawsuits linked to getting prize money while doping and a libel case he won against a newspaper who said he doped. Not only can they revisit those lawsuits but he could easily be found guilty of perjury as a result of his testimony in those cases.I can't help but wonder how long it will be before all his sponsors go after his money. This was fraud on a massive scale and he is sitting pretty.
dunno... my (amateurish) guess would be, that the differences would be near same, just the average speed would drop... that would make actually no difference for the average joe, as they wouldn't notice the difference...do you really want to watch a doping free tour?
probably not.
looks like they're all jumping ship... first nike, now RadioShack, Anhesuser-Busch, Giro, and Trek.
http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/10/news/nike-ends-relationship-with-armstrong-continues-livestrong-collaboration_261699
Sad to say but after being a fan since the mid-80's I don't really want to watch the Tour that much anymore anyway, juice or no juice.do you really want to watch a doping free tour?
probably not.
That reminds me of an Andy Richter bit on Conan from years ago. (I couldn't find it on youtube). When Andy does the New York marathon, "at his own pace".....they showed him over the course of the week, sauntering down the street wearing his number plate, eating an ice cream cone....stopping in front of a movie theater, looking up at hte marquis....shrugging, and goes in.do you really want to watch a doping free tour?
probably not.
it's like NASCAR, I watch it for the crashesThat reminds me of an Andy Richter bit on Conan from years ago. (I couldn't find it on youtube). When Andy does the New York marathon, "at his own pace".....they showed him over the course of the week, sauntering down the street wearing his number plate, eating an ice cream cone....stopping in front of a movie theater, looking up at hte marquis....shrugging, and goes in.
i imagine that's how the tour would go without juice.
But I don't give a crap about the TdF anyway.
agree.dunno... my (amateurish) guess would be, that the differences would be near same, just the average speed would drop... that would make actually no difference for the average joe, as they wouldn't notice the difference...
They don't want to be drug tested either?Says something about oakley
"by douches, for douches"
That's dirtmikes dream job to work for Oakley .Says something about oakley
Not sure that I'm ok with people demanding money back from a cancer-fighting organization just because the spokesman is a douche... Time to separate the organization from the namesake.on today's episode... people asking for their donations back
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/19/us/lance-armstrong/index.html?hpt=hp_c2