"Participating ISPs include AT&T, Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Verizon"
full story...
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2401686,00.asp
full story...
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2401686,00.asp
wrong!the effort also has the support of the riaa and the motion picture association of america, as well as small and independent studios and labels.
If you use torrents it's not a case of them knowing what you send. It's a very specific behaviour that even a blind man can see.encryption anyone?
It doesn't matter. Torrents are not illegal, and nobody can send you a letter telling you to stop torrenting.If you use torrents it's not a case of them knowing what you send. It's a very specific behaviour that even a blind man can see.
this. torrenting is perfectly legal. a lot of linux distro iso's are shared this way.It doesn't matter. Torrents are not illegal, and nobody can send you a letter telling you to stop torrenting.
Seriously, I've got a ton of friends in local bands, and every single one of them would be mad if an ISP stopped letting people download their music. They are just happy for the exposure.wrong!
I know that but in here we have something like a "suspicion of crime" where the police can enter your house. I'm pretty sure constant, heavy torrent use may fall under that.It doesn't matter. Torrents are not illegal, and nobody can send you a letter telling you to stop torrenting.
This isn't a legal issue. This is an agreement between the MPAA and the ISPs to cut off service if they find you violating this agreement repeatedly. The police are not involved.I know that but in here we have something like a "suspicion of crime" where the police can enter your house. I'm pretty sure constant, heavy torrent use may fall under that.
I guess there are some laws that work better in the us. Though here it's legal to download movies and songs for "personal use".This isn't a legal issue. This is an agreement between the MPAA and the ISPs to cut off service if they find you violating this agreement repeatedly. The police are not involved.
In any event, though, in the US, suspicion of a crime has some pretty stringent guidelines around it, including reasonable evidence prior to engaging a suspect, and they are very limited in what they can actually do - searching your house isn't one of them.
I'm guessing the ISPs decided it for two reasons:I have to say I only skimmed over the article. It's even worse than I thought. What do really ISP's gain from that agreement?
B)The thing is MPAA has no way to block ISPs from reaching future online distribution sites. They are not studios directly. They enforce their interests but it doesn't go ther other way and it's not in not in studios interest to block a large % of potential clientsI'm guessing the ISPs decided it for two reasons:
A) it was less paperwork/hassle than actually dealing with court-ordered enforcement, and
B) I suspect the major content distributors want to play nice with the MPAA as (legit) online distribution of movies continues to be a huge money-maker.
I completely agree, but do you really like the idea that your ISP is just constantly monitoring and logging everything you do?I hate people that expect everything to be $2 or free.
They are but the cake here are future VOD, DDL sites. Look how much trafic netflix generates. I've read somewhere it's up to 38% of net traffic at certain hours. That means netflix customers probably pay for higher net options = valuable customers to the ISPs. Studios now try to fight netflix and probably they will create an alternative and if they block a major ISP from their site it will be a big opportunity for Apple, Amazon or Google. I think they are all preparing their own offers. Of course the studios are in a comfortable position since they own the movies but if they **** it up they will end up with movie Itunes.It's not about reaching distribution sites, really. All of the ISPs involved are direct content distributors. New content deals are struck daily.
It's a little silly to say that the MPAA isn't a studio and thus won't move to block that which they view to be against their interests. The MPAA and studios work hand-in-hand - and they do things all the time which block large numbers of potential clients.
Maybe the hassle is worth the clients, maybe not. The particular clients involved are going to be the top bandwidth consumers anyway, and I read an article some months ago about just how intrusive this process was on the ISPs. They may find a backlash, but they obviously think it's worth the risk.
I will say, this whole thing has got me thinking about a decent VPN service. Obviously the VPN services could be monitoring what I'm doing, but it troubles me a little that the ISPs are taking on this policing service and monitoring traffic.
I hate it when the industry ignores reality and waste resources on a non-problem:I hope it happens, I hate people that expect everything to be $2 or free.
I completely agree, but do you really like the idea that your ISP is just constantly monitoring and logging everything you do?
somewhere there are germans whose mouths are watering at the thought......Well I cordially invite them to dine on the corn in my pooh.