And like in 95 they had a (second) referendum in the Frensch parts of Canada for the creation of their own state. I belive the first referendum was in 85?And it is one among 30+ parties, more than a couple of whom want to see canada cease to exist as it currently does. They are all allowed to have a voice, as they are the voice of the people (to whatever degree of support they have behind them).
Disenfranchising the population is not the answer. If, hypothetically, 90% of Israel's population wanted to see Israel cease to exist, it would be atrocious for the government to try and do otherwise simply to keep themselves employed and in power.
I've answered this but I want to stress that the stances of those two parties were not about seasing the existance of Israel, nor kicking anyone out, only a change in the constitution to evolve from a race specific state to a state for all its citizens.I understand and acknowledge that, but Canada would still exist, under the parties being discussed Israel would not exist at all. VERY DIFFERENT. I don't see the similarity between calling for a part of a country to become another country and, one minority group of people in a country taking over and kicking out/ killing the majority (their words not mine) in order to create an entirely new country
Those are indeed Palestinians that wouldn't let the terrorist actions of organizations like the Haganah and the Stern Gang scare them into leaving their homes. I saw a short documentary/reportage about those who opted to stay in Jaffa.Again if you would read my posts you would see that I agree with you that if Arab-Israelis (Arab-Israeli's not Palestinians these are Arabs who live in Israel proper who actually have the same rights as Israelis) want to destroy Israel and create a political party about it (so long as they no longer openly advocate genocide, if you are going to try and defend that then you truly are retarded) then so be it. All I am saying is you are comparing 2 totally different situations that don't work. All I am trying to do is point out the other side of the argument (and stating a disagree with it) to have an understanding of where both sides are coming from.