Blah. That dude lists his top national values at family (good), military, and church.
No offense to people of faith - I'm all about freedom of worship. But it's far from a top national priority.
And if the USA didn't spend 300 gajillion bazillion dollars every month trying to control oil by spraying it's military's piss all over the Arab world, the rest of the world wouldn't need nearly as much of a military.
I'm only 1/3 through it. One quote from the article that irked me:
Poor old Diamond can't see the forest because of his obsession with the trees. (Russia's collapsing even as it's undergoing reforestation.)
Now, on page 15 of the book, Diamond says, "I should add, of course, that just as climate change, hostile neighbors, and trade partners may or may not contribute to a particluar society's collapse, environmental damage may or may not contribute. It would be absurd to claim that environmental damage must be a major factor in all collapses: the collapse of the Soviet Union is a modern counter-example, and the destruction of Carthage by Rome in 146 B.C. is an ancient one."
Seems to me that Steyn read the synopsis of the book and went from there...
He has some valid points, but the overall thrust I do not find terribly convincing. Basically, he stops not far short (or event not short at all) of predicting that most of the Western world will be thrown into cultural chaos and conflict as Muslims reproduce and begin to take over institutions and enact Islamic law as the legal norm.
One problem is that like Ehrlich and Malthus (the former he mentions in the article in rather uncomplimentary fashion), his predictions are of a coming doom that, above all, assumes the status quo. He fails to take into account the demographic transition occurring at present, not just what has happened in the last couple of decades.
He also seems to suggest something like this: we should ignore the environment, personal rights etc. in favor of getting it on.
And couldn't we maybe be worried about the religious nuts in this country perhaps going too far before the "Islamists" get here?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.