My rationale: the extra width might make the bike feel slightly more stable and last a little longer but I don't think you need it because you're such a light rider. I run a 22 in front and a 23 in the back. I think that stepping down to a narrower tire will make the bike feel a little more nimble and a bit quicker.
My rationale: the extra width might make the bike feel slightly more stable and last a little longer but I don't think you need it because you're such a light rider. I run a 22 in front and a 23 in the back. I think that stepping down to a narrower tire will make the bike feel a little more nimble and a bit quicker.
25c tires have a smaller contact patch than 23c tires remember, so there is less rubber on the road slowing your down.
I have 25s on some of my bikes, they are a bit more comfortable, but not really any slower.
I think it's a psychological thing personally. Unless you're in a TT and need the smallest cross section, 25s are more than fine for most people. I've got a buddy who pretty much only rides 25s on all his bikes, and he's an absolute hammer.
Yes, of course, and of brand, etc. But there was a review in one of the Euro mags a while back, comparing contact area. 23c had a longer, narrower patch, while 25c had more of a square contact area.
This is assuming the same tire at the same pressure.
23c is narrower, so was more aerodynamic as the speed picked up.
I think that for most people, the 25c is the more comfortable size, with similar performance.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.