I just think its funny how this country picks and chooses. Remember when after all the other "reasons" for invading Iraq turned out to be false? The justification turned into, "Oh, well Saddams a really bad guy", which is true of course, but how do you justify not invading TONS of other countries when just being an asshole is apparently reason enough to start a decade (and counting) long war?Not that it's a totally invalid point, but should the existence/toleration of one bad regime mean we are forbidden to act against another? Or is it incumbent on us to launch a synchronized worldwide war of consistent moral crusading if we're going to do anything??