Last-place aversion.
Before today, I hadn't heard of this concept described by this very term, but I'd certainly heard of its effects. I think it's an important concept, as it provides a model for the seemingly paradoxical lack of support for redistributive policies from the very people that would benefit from such policies. Think Joe The Plumber. Think poor Southern white people voting Republican year after year. Think of black youths in LA targeting just-barely-less-poor Korean shopkeepers in the Rodney King riots.
Kuziemko et al. describe last-place aversion as such:
This last bit is the most interesting to me. Rather than summarize I'll just quote the whole relevant paragraph from their introduction, emphasis added by me:
Before today, I hadn't heard of this concept described by this very term, but I'd certainly heard of its effects. I think it's an important concept, as it provides a model for the seemingly paradoxical lack of support for redistributive policies from the very people that would benefit from such policies. Think Joe The Plumber. Think poor Southern white people voting Republican year after year. Think of black youths in LA targeting just-barely-less-poor Korean shopkeepers in the Rodney King riots.
Kuziemko et al. describe last-place aversion as such:
They go much further than mere description of the concept in their paper, linked below, and confirm its existence experimentally (second-to-last place person in a game where a ladder of income distribution is created artificially is the least generous) and by parsing survey data regarding support for minimum wage increases and for whites' attitudes towards blacks.We hypothesize that there is a basic, psychological aversion to feeling that one is in 'last place,' which could increase competition and inhibit political unity among members of low-income groups. Instead of uniting in pursuit of common interests, working class groups may wish to punish the groups slightly below or above themselves, with the hope of having at least one group 'below' them.
This last bit is the most interesting to me. Rather than summarize I'll just quote the whole relevant paragraph from their introduction, emphasis added by me:
Intrigued? Read the whole draft NBER working paper by Kuziemko et al. here: http://www.princeton.edu/~kuziemko/lpa_draft.pdfIn the General Social Survey, white support for redistribution toward blacks increases with self-assessed place in the income distribution. In particular, moving from self-reported 'average' to 'below average' income is associated with a large decrease in white support for policies that aid blacks, but moving from 'average' to 'above average' has little effect, suggesting that the aversion to aid for blacks is concentrated among those whites who perceive themselves in danger of being in 'last place.' Moreover, while other 'illiberal' or 'intolerant' positions generally decrease with income among whites, they tend not to display the same sharp drop between below and average income. For example, subjects who report having average income are generally just as nativist, homophobic, anti-semetic and intolerant of unpopular speech as those who report having below average income.