That thread is a must-read for every armchair physician and engineer who asserts that a Leatt "surely" saved [them/their friend/their cat] from a cervical fracture. Great questions being asked, particularly concerning third-party empirical data and interpretation.DMXS solicited questions about the brace on the Vital MX forum, and the biomedical engineer from Leatt posted some interesting info in the thread.
Interesting... I don't think that would work too well with my chicken wing shoulder blades... Maybe it would.so does anyone know what's up with these road braces? this seems to address my main concerns with the back portion sitting on the spine, or not in this case....usable for mtb?
http://www.leattbraces.com/moto-neck-braces/stx-road-neck-brace.html#g_76_0
You know people said the same thing about full face helmets as well. I think we will eventually see this become mandatory equipment just like the full face and insurance will be the driving force, albeit it will be a long way awayI cant even ride wearing full armor, let alone a brace.
I just dont have as much fun riding with all that stuff and I dont feel comfortable on the bike.
Not feeling comfortable on the bike makes me crash
I dont know if longer neck is more prone to injury but i'm 100% sure that peoples with longer neck are the ones confortable with a leatt brace..i have tried one for a while and i can say its impossible for me to ride with one with any sort of confort... I dont think i have a short neck, but not a long one either. Nek lenght is for sure a factor in confort with a neck brace...I think I agree with everything you said. The more I ride and the more I see different kinds of people ride it seems that the people who get really hurt are the people who ride just a little too fast for their reaction speed and falling/rolling ability. I definitely think wearing a leatt reduces that ability to tuck and roll.
Also, does anyone have any info on neck length v. injury? I've always wondered if a longer neck allows more mobility and thus easier to roll out of things, or creates a longer lever and more prone to injury.
great read, thanks. I'm more than happy to continue to use my leatt.That thread is a must-read for every armchair physician and engineer who asserts that a Leatt "surely" saved [them/their friend/their cat] from a cervical fracture. Great questions being asked, particularly concerning third-party empirical data and interpretation.
That's specifically if you're playing hockey and are about to go headon with the boards or goalpost.also, for those ninja's who think they can 'tuck and roll' - this was linked to in the article;
http://www.heads-upstabilizer.com/spinal_injuries_in_hockey.html
Goal posts - no duhThat's specifically if you're playing hockey and are about to go headon with the boards or goalpost.
I have tucked and rolled out of countless OTB incidents and I'm no ninja, just took a few basic martial arts courses and gymnastics when I was a kid. If you think keeping your head up and doing a scorpion grind is a better solution... well, good luck with that.
There may be actual value in wearing one. Just don't assert that there's any peer-reviewed data to back up that assertion. Leatt's done an effective job of coloring the discussion with emotional marketing, much to their financial benefit.great read, thanks. I'm more than happy to continue to use my leatt.
damn, that was scary. How is your friend doing?Check 2.58 min
My friend...first race this season, first race with a Leatt brace.
i made no such assertion. please don't use a strawman like that to prove your point.There may be actual value in wearing one. Just don't assert that there's any peer-reviewed data to back up that assertion. Leatt's done an effective job of coloring the discussion with emotional marketing, much to their financial benefit.
With that many devices on the market, it shouldn't be difficult for an independent body to conduct a study, or to at least have access to data.
Wasn't necessarily directed at you.i made no such assertion. please don't use a strawman like that to prove your point.
He was sore, but ok.damn, that was scary. How is your friend doing?
I haven't been on the monkey much lately. I got on here to post this link.Dr. Chris Leatt was on DMXS radio last night. Haven't had a chance to listen to the podcast yet, but will hopefully have time today. If you just want to listen to the portion of the show with Dr. Leatt, here's a link.
DMXS solicited questions about the brace on the Vital MX forum, and the biomedical engineer from Leatt posted some interesting info in the thread.
I think in this case testimony from his doctor is a pretty good substitute for attempting to replicate the accident.But the question still remains unanswered if the crash would have actually killed you because that is impossible to tell since the exact crash wont happen twice, so you could do it without the Leatt and see what happens. But i guess once is more than enough
Those people probably aren't using the internet...Devil's Advocate: We hear about all these crashes in which people believe a leatt saved their life or kept them out of a wheel chair now. Why didn't we hear more horror stories about people getting paralyzed or killed in our sport before?
Agreed. It would clear up a lot of confusion over issues with the Leatt.I haven't been on the monkey much lately. I got on here to post this link.
Anyway, everyone should listen to the interview with Dr Leatt.
But what about the emotional anecdotes, complete with photos? I don't have any proof, but I know that these devices are saving lives!Agreed. It would clear up a lot of confusion over issues with the Leatt.
For example the braces rear stabiliser Fails at 300nm. For an impact that could cause a spinal fracture in the location would need to be 900nm. Basically, if people have a crash that results in a fracture in that region it was going to happen regardless of them wearing a brace.
Agreed. It would clear up a lot of confusion over issues with the Leatt.
For example the braces rear stabiliser Fails at 300nm. For an impact that could cause a spinal fracture in the location would need to be 900nm. Basically, if people have a crash that results in a fracture in that region it was going to happen regardless of them wearing a brace.
you using the x1?To me the Leatt design doesn't quite feel right...i get the sensation that pressure will be applied in areas I don't want. The Omega immediately felt more comfortable -- not just less intrusive, but it also felt like it would apply pressure to areas that are mostly muscle and not delicate bone.
Yep. I've written about it a couple of times. I'm not the kind of person that pushes anything on anyone, but sometimes it seems to me that mtb riders act as if Leatt is the only brand on the market, so I encourage people to consider other brands. Hell this very thread is an example of that Leatt-centric view -- look at the thread title.you using the x1?
That's probably because I was referring to my experiences with my leatt brace. Pros with leatts got mentioned just to fan a fire/add to ridemonkey asshat-eryHell this very thread is an example of that Leatt-centric view -- look at the thread title.
Again, everyone should listen to the interview with Chris Leatt.