Mtb_Rob_FL said:Well that doesn't work, givin the evil people in the world now does it?
Who said everyone follows that law?
Obviously it isn't exact. Just like how the "torture" they used on those Guantanimo people was some people's wet dream.
Mtb_Rob_FL said:Well that doesn't work, givin the evil people in the world now does it?
Yeah, that's where we're trying to go with M-Theory (and I hope we get there!), but essentially you're right - it seems there will always be 'the next big question' which we are forced to creep towards in the hope of one day arriving at the answer to - no doubt to be confronted by another. I feel it is intelectually lazy to just say 'ahh, it's god. Whatcha gonna do?' when we run up against such problems. I don't think it's to hard to accept we don't know something without feeling the need to explain it away with the supernatural.Westy said:This is something I have actually been reading up on lately and maybe I just have not gotten to that chapter yet but modern theory can model things back to a certain point. Before this point all known theories break down to a point to where they can only say, "we have no freaking idea". Similar to what we know about what goes on past the singularity of a black hole, basically time/space as we know ceases to exist, but something exists.
Exactly. They are highly useful conceptual tools but it's important to remember they don't actually exist as fundamental forces except in relation to your own situation.N8 said:I think most humans have a inherent concept of bad and good.
It is our society which tells us what the make up of those concepts are though.
I'll argue that while man initially developed they were organized into small family groups, but at some point it became advantageous to organize into larger groups. Since humans could not instinctively bond with those outside the family structure it was quicker to adapt by coming up with concepts of morality, religion, civility and to a point patriotism to make those larger groups successful. Adaptations in ideas work faster than imprinted instincts. I think you can apply concepts of darwinism to religeon. It could certainly explain certain religeous stands on family planning.N8 said:I think most humans have a inherent concept of bad and good.
It is our society which tells us what the make up of those concepts are though.
The human condition is only 'frail' when held up against an impossible-to-achieve image of perfection. In reality emotion is a useful evolutionary attribute. And anyway as Westy (I think) pointed out, God apparantly has displayed anger/joy at some point. Which kind of shoots himself in the foot really...N8 said:I'd like think that god is more like the Greek Gods.... none are all good and none are all bad.... and they have all the fraility of the human condition and love it!
Westy said:I'll argue that while man initially developed they were organized into small family groups, but at some point it became advantageous to organize into larger groups. Since humans could not instinctively bond with those outside the family structure it was quicker to adapt by coming up with concepts of morality, religion, civility and to a point patriotism to make those larger groups successful. Adaptations in ideas work faster than imprinted instincts. I think you can apply concepts of darwinism to religeon. It could certainly explain certain religeous stands on family planning.
Changleen said:The human condition is only 'frail' when held up against an impossible-to-achieve image of perfection. In reality emotion is a useful evolutionary attribute. And anyway as Westy (I think) pointed out, God apparantly has displayed anger/joy at some point. Which kind of shoots himself in the foot really...
N8 said:So if we owe our good looks to god then perhaps he's the source of other things as well. Emotion for example. We know that god 'loves' and 'hates'... This make god less than perfect in my mind.
I think we'd be much better off with a god that shares none of our emotions which are one of our greatest weaknesses.
This is what was so revolutionary in the begining of the book of Exodus, this God speaks to Moses and says that "He is" - not like those other. Notice His Name (which in classic Jewish understanding tells alot about and individual) is a verb not a noun - in the Hebrew at least.N8 said:So if 'god' is so incomprehensible, what's the point and why exactly would be care about each and every human more so than say.... a rock or a fish for example???
I can't say I've given that much thought.Changleen said:...
Andyman, do you believe that humanity is the only life in the universe?
Don't waste your time with Calvin, he had no idea what he was doing and only wanted to form a "club" type atmosphere for Christianity.Silver said:BS, meet John Calvin. Mr. Calvin, BS.
We'll have to agree to disagree here.Changleen said:Another aspect of the traditional definition of god which I find hard to swallow. Nothing we've yet discovered is apparantly anything like infinite. In fact, I think the concept of infinity is just that - a concept. I can lump it in there with good and evil. A useful conceptual tool, but you should be aware that it is dangerous to actually apply it absolutely in any situation for fear of distorting your view of reality.
I have as it is a doctrine of Mormonism, and it is absolutley ridiculous with respect to the Judeo/Christian idea of God and how He operate - which Mormonism claims to be a part of.Changleen said:Come on, you can do better than that! Seriously, you must have considered this, right?
I can't speak for the Quran, but I can for the Torah and the Bible, with all due respect you incorrect in your assesment of God and His interference as defined by these Texts.Changleen said:god doesn't intefere on a daily basis, and apparantly only has done so in 'biblical' (or torah/koran etc - I'm gonna use biblical as a blanket term from now on) stories..........
Are you serious? What about good and evil? Do you believe in absolute good and evil?Andyman_1970 said:We'll have to agree to disagree here.
Enlighten me.Andyman_1970 said:I can't speak for the Quran, but I can for the Torah and the Bible, with all due respect you incorrect in your assesment of God and His interference as defined by these Texts.
Read my first post to N8 about God's Name and the Hebrew understanding of God's immanence (precence amoung us).Changleen said:Enlighten me.
Good yes, evil I'm not so sure about - I've been wading through Talmud (the Oral Torah) when I get a chance on this (about 30 volumes of about 1000 pages a volume).Changleen said:Are you serious? What about good and evil? Do you believe in absolute good and evil?
Well, as you know I'm not a Mormon, or religious at all really, and I think that the possibility of a advanced species being responsible for the creation of the universe is far more likely than any of your 'god' theories. Are you actually incapable of considering this idea without the confines of the rules of your religion? After all I find 'the Judeo/Christian idea of God and how He operates' 'absolutley ridiculous'.Andyman_1970 said:I have as it is a doctrine of Mormonism, and it is absolutley ridiculous with respect to the Judeo/Christian idea of God and how He operate - which Mormonism claims to be a part of.
A Christian that wants to be true to the Text should keep an open mind - we as Christian are told to "test everything". So no I don't just float along in life and say "oh science, that's of the devil", I test it, I examine it, where I find truth (as opposed to Truth, notice the capitalization and lower case text) I claim it.Changleen said:Do you activly disbelieve in the tennants of science? In that other thread were you not saying a good christian should keep an open mind?
Again, you are more than welcome to that idea, and you are more than welcome to think the Judeo/Christian idea of God is ridiculous.Changleen said:Well, as you know I'm not a Mormon, or religious at all really, and I think that the possibility of a advanced species being responsible for the creation of the universe is far more likely than any of your 'god' theories. Are you actually incapable of considering this idea without the confines of the rules of your religion? After all I find 'the Judeo/Christian idea of God and how He operates' 'absolutley ridiculous'.
Truth:Andyman_1970 said:A Christian that wants to be true to the Text should keep an open mind - we as Christian are told to "test everything". So no I don't just float along in life and say "oh science, that's of the devil", I test it, I examine it, where I find truth (as opposed to Truth, notice the capitalization and lower case text) I claim it.
No, I'm trying to understand the basis of your belief.Andyman_1970 said:However, if you're asking questions to belittle me or my beliefs - I've got better things to do.
When I refer to "Truth" I'm referring to aboslute Truth in the theological sense.Changleen said:Truth:
- Conformity to fact or actuality.
- A statement proven to be or accepted as true.
So you mean you have another definition of 'truth' that I am not aware of? Like, your own, personal version of the truth?
I don't care about that - What I'm trying to get out of you is why you discount this as a theory other than that it simply disagrees with your religion. Why?Andyman_1970 said:Again, you are more than welcome to that idea, and you are more than welcome to think the Judeo/Christian idea of God is ridiculous.
Cool them I'm down wit dat........................Changleen said:No, I'm trying to understand the basis of your belief.
This is where those of us who are Jews, Christians, Muslims, Hindus and the like "take a leap". Other than faith I can't shed much more light on it than that.Changleen said:I don't care about that - What I'm trying to get out of you is why you discount this as a theory other than that it simply disagrees with your religion. Why?
As far as I'm concerned the truth is the truth, but anyway - 'theological truth' - it seems many philosophers have a problem with it in that essentially it lacks objectivity, and therefore reality, and therefore truth itself? Is theological truth in serious danger of being a 'lie you tell to yourself?'Andyman_1970 said:When I refer to "Truth" I'm referring to aboslute Truth in the theological sense.
I'm less concerned with Western/Greek thinking philosphers and prefer to spend my time reseaching the Eastern/Hebrew ideas of truth. Again, with the idea of Theology (the study of God) we run into the faith impass you and I have.Changleen said:As far as I'm concerned the truth is the truth, but anyway - 'theological truth' - it seems many philosophers have a problem with it in that essentially it lacks objectivity, and therefore reality, and therefore truth itself? Is theological truth in serious danger of being a 'lie you tell to yourself?'
Is that a yes? :devil:Andyman_1970 said:I'm less concerned with Western/Greek thinking philosphers and prefer to spend my time reseaching the Eastern/Hebrew ideas of truth. Again, with the idea of Theology (the study of God) we run into the faith impass you and I have.
If you really want to know I'll be more than happy to share my story with you - however if it's going to be a dissection of my flawed logic or thinking then all pass.Changleen said:Is that a yes? :devil:
Seriously, What made you believe in the first place?
Whatever wannabe robot.... emotions could very well be a key that could possibly grow us closer in understanding a relationship with a "higher power". Perhaps you are referring to a subsequent action or non-actions derived from emotion....N8 said:So if we owe our good looks to god then perhaps he's the source of other things as well. Emotion for example. We know that god 'loves' and 'hates'... This make god less than perfect in my mind.
I think we'd be much better off with a god that shares none of our emotions which are one of our greatest weaknesses.
i've thought this as well..... Just as life for an individual, the spiritual journey is always in motion, shouldn't it be same for mankind?-BB- said:How about this?
Philosophy, Science, and Religion are all like 3 people all traveling towards the same place, but from different directions, so they describe the journey in differnet ways. As they get closer and closer though, what they each see begins to have more and more in common.
makes you
Haha the first and possibly last funny post from Mack.mack said:BAD RELIGION
A good blanket satement and a good band.
OK, Cool. I would like to read the story, especially a) wrt your schooling and b) especially the bit where you (if you?) decided religion was the most important thing in your life.Andyman_1970 said:If you really want to know I'll be more than happy to share my story with you - however if it's going to be a dissection of my flawed logic or thinking then all pass.
I will say I have appreciated the tone of your post's Chang, it's refreshing.
I don't hate America... I just hate your moron leader and those who unquestioningly follow him. If I really hated America, would I hang out on US website full of Americans? I'd hang out on a.. I dunno, Iranian website... I could bitch about you behind your back.Skookum said:Ok who wants to place bet that Andyman will "save" Changleen and will grow to love George Bush Jr. and love America. 300 to 1 odds.
Well, we did just discover a new huge natural gas field so I might start to worry, but I recon we could take you. We have way better guns than Iraq and you can't even finish them off.Skookum said:we :heart: New Zealand too.
So much that we will now attack you and take you over!!!! :evil: :dancing: