Quantcast

Loop D Loop

911

Monkey
Feb 28, 2002
275
0
Vail CO
When you said "loop d loop" I thought you ment he was going to try two loops in succession... that would be rad. I don't see what all the hype is about one loop though, it's already been done long ago.
 

biggins

Rump Junkie
May 18, 2003
7,173
9
actually cowan did it in one of the new world disorders and it was also done at the freeze ride. but now that it has been done in the UK it is has now officialy "been done"
 

- seb

Turbo Monkey
Apr 10, 2002
2,924
1
UK
bring it onnnnnnnnnn :D

*hand in the air* I expect to die :)

Which is better for this ****, a hardtail or a full sus? I'm guessing hardtail for the loop but there'll be loads of drops and stuff too...

anyone have a figure on the size of the loop so i can calculate the required velocity to not **** it up? ;)
 

- seb

Turbo Monkey
Apr 10, 2002
2,924
1
UK
I think my maths must be way off here, for a 7ft radius loop I reckon you only need to be doing 23mph? Anyone care to check :)
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,638
8,683
Originally posted by - seb
I think my maths must be way off here, for a 7ft radius loop I reckon you only need to be doing 23mph? Anyone care to check :)
mg == mv^2/r
==> g == v^2/r
==> sqrt(r*g) == v
substitute r = 1.8m, g = 9.8m/s^2 and we get 4.2 m/s, or 9.5 mph. so we have to be going 9.5 mph at the top of the loop. how fast must we be going at the bottom of the loop then? add in potential energy:

KEatstart == KEattop + PE
1/2 mv^2 == 1/2 m(4.2m/s)^2 + mgh
==> v^2 == (4.2m/s)^2 + 2gh
substitute g = 9.8 m/s^2, h = 3.6m and we get, ignoring units for a second:
==> v^2 == 17.64 + 70.56 == 88.2
==> v == 9.4 m/s, or 21mph.

conclusion: i basically agree with you :D
 

- seb

Turbo Monkey
Apr 10, 2002
2,924
1
UK
I couldn't be arsed to write out my maths, did it on the back of an envelope - first time I've done anything like that for about 5 years so was pleased I could remember how to do it :)