The risk can't be that high if riders still think cardboard protective gear is a good idea.Risk taking should be part of the sport, but not to the point where grave injury becomes common and expected.
Sounds like a DT tweet.The risk can't be that high if riders still think cardboard protective gear is a good idea.
I don't think I have seen anyone lately that was wearing full body protection. Sad!
hasn't gwin been wearing elbow, knee and torso protection the last year or two?The risk can't be that high if riders still think cardboard protective gear is a good idea.
I don't think I have seen anyone lately that was wearing full body protection. Sad!
The risk can't be that high if riders still think cardboard protective gear is a good idea.
I don't think I have seen anyone lately that was wearing full body protection. Sad!
Isn't Loic Bruni always wearing full armor? Markus Pekoll is, that I'm sure about.The risk can't be that high if riders still think cardboard protective gear is a good idea.
I don't think I have seen anyone lately that was wearing full body protection. Sad!
Dentistry?She'll probably make triple the cash after university and get to continue riding.
Win win?
They're not tho. The fastest Women are miles behind the top Men. Ergo the women are NOT as big risk takers in the first place.At some point the riders are all just as good as each other and the race rewards the biggest risk takers.
The creativity, risks taken and skill displayed by the worlds best riders is the number one reason I enjoy watching DH. This is also why I rarely ever bother watching Womens' DH.Risk taking should be part of the sport, but not to the point where grave injury becomes common and expected.
Full body armor doesn't stop broken bones, tears or separations. Sure, it potentially can save you from a cut, if it stays in place and maybe a broken knee cap, but no amount of body armor will keep you from breaking your hip a la Gee or say... a shatter ankle a la Bryceland.I don't think I have seen anyone lately that was wearing full body protection. Sad!
I know, but it still helps. My point is that most decide to not wear it, which either means they think it doesn't help anyway or they don't think the risk is that high.Full body armor doesn't stop broken bones, tears or separations. Sure, it potentially can save you from a cut, if it stays in place and maybe a broken knee cap, but no amount of body armor will keep you from breaking your hip a la Gee or say... a shatter ankle a la Bryceland.
It's not that black and white.I know, but it still helps. My point is that most decide to not wear it, which either means they think it doesn't help anyway or they don't think the risk is that high.
No one races Downhill mountain bikes for the (reward) money.Question is more so risk vs reward. Manon dosent get to buy a Porsche even if she would win every race left of her career, so what is she risking life long injury for then? Glory? The women are taking more risk for their rewards than the men and that is both a little stupid and admirable imo.
Two of them have cocks?Anyone care to guess the difference between say Minnaar/Gwin to Rachel, seeing as they are dominating their respective categories?
Yet. Put some airbags on those mofos with sensors.Full body armor doesn't stop broken bones, tears or separations. Sure, it potentially can save you from a cut, if it stays in place and maybe a broken knee cap, but no amount of body armor will keep you from breaking your hip a la Gee or say... a shatter ankle a la Bryceland.
If the field is women, and they all have the same relative skill, or there is simply an over-saturation of that skill level, my point holds true. I'm not comparing them to men, I'm comparing them to their field. If it gets to the point where it's just stupid risk-taking (for women), considering their natural ability and speed, I totally get retiring because there's little point in exposing yourself to that kind of risk. I think to some extent, with youtube and every other medial channel we can absorb these days, we become desensitized to it all. Thinking that we can go pull off some of the stunts we see every day. For sure, some of these require lots of training and skill, but some are just dumb and only worked on the day recorded due to dumb luck, but watch it over and over and you think it's the norm. When you are young, you tend to not think about the consequences, to some extent, people take advantage of you for this.They're not tho. The fastest Women are miles behind the top Men. Ergo the women are NOT as big risk takers in the first place.
it doesn'tit actually feels way nicer to ride a bike in lycra too...
No one races Downhill mountain bikes for the (reward) money.
Two of them have cocks?
That's a good point. Even at a riding level us mortals can comprehend we know its often safer and less physically taxing if you can clear jumps to their intended landers. When jumps on WC courses are built to tailor to the strength of the top male riders, you'll often see the less physically strong riders coming up short and getting bounced/bucked hard. Mustn't be a whole lot of fun doing that day in, day out.I feel like the women at that level are suffering most of the time. Casing jumps and a generally stiffer body posture are the norm.
I would say it is not a fair comparison. The women field is smaller, so it would be easier to get a top 10 result. But really the biggest difference is how much exposure you get for your sponsor. There is hardly a bike mag that you open or a WC slide show that doesn't have a cool whip pic of Brendon. His video/movie projects also get him decent exposure. A woman with a similar profile as Brendon is maybe Casey Brown.Look at Brendog, far worse results than Manon but he can most likely live of this industry pretty comfortably the rest of his life. So female riders have far worse risk reward ratio on what they are doing.
Or you have an awkward mud hole, that many monkeys felt should be part of a WC track, which ended the longest winning streak ever.I forget which WC it was this year, but didn't one have a massive step-down roadgap near the finish line that looked like it belonged in a Crankworx Joyride event? Make a mistake there and you're going to have an injury that you won't shrug off with a good nights sleep.
Pretty sure that's the jump last year where Manon had a major crash to the point her shoe even blew off...... Was amazed she was able to do anything else that season after that!I forget which WC it was this year, but didn't one have a massive step-down roadgap near the finish line that looked like it belonged in a Crankworx Joyride event? Make a mistake there and you're going to have an injury that you won't shrug off with a good nights sleep. All for a couple of grand in prize money (if that) and a free bike and kit for a year.
Can probably make more as a Bar Tender at a busy bar in a major city easy.If she has done the analysis and can comfortably say the job/career out of uni will be better for her in the long run , then good for her. No sense in creating more injuries if you know you could make the same or more money doing stuff that doest taxi the body as much. You'd think she'd be in the mtb top 1%. But maybe for women that's not such a big deal. I see Emily batty on the xc side of things rolling like a princess. Perhaps that isn't the same for dh?
Anyways...risk vs reward vs alternatives.
Still love ya manon!
Time to order up a 29er it seems.No pro MTB rider retires on their winnings, they all have to do something afterward to pay the bills, Nico runs a team, CG owns a bar, Peaty sells valve stem condoms, Missy sold weed for a while, may as well get a jump start on the retirement job now.
Jurgen Beneke plasters walls and has a nice bike rack to sell!No pro MTB rider retires on their winnings, they all have to do something afterward to pay the bills, Nico runs a team, CG owns a bar, Peaty sells valve stem condoms, Missy sold weed for a while, may as well get a jump start on the retirement job now.
They're not tho. The fastest Women are miles behind the top Men. Ergo the women are NOT as big risk takers in the first place.
I'd estimate (on the generous side) maybe 1-2% of them do?I don't think too many professional MTB riders make enough in their short careers to live comfortably off later in life