Quantcast

Marzocchi SL 2006 5.75 Lbs, 170mm vs Fox Van 36 RC2 2006 5.45 Lbs, 160mm

Discussion in 'Downhill & Freeride' started by Racillo, Nov 24, 2005.

  1. Racillo

    Racillo Chimp

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Messages:
    12
    Location:
    Lima, Peru
    Planning to buy one of these two forks, I will change my Super T Pro 2003, whant to go lighter, any suggestions, would like to know your point of view about these two new forks.
    __________________
     

    Please register to disable this ad.

  2. sanjuro

    sanjuro Tube Smuggler

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 0
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,472
    Location:
    SF
    both are flexy
     
  3. Spokompton

    Spokompton Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    321
    Location:
    Spokane WA
    He's serious!:nuts:




    Actually in some ways they are stiffer than the DC Super T. I've riden the SuperT along with a 66. 66 has less flex front to rear. Less movement in the bushings.

    My 66sl is coming in next week. I will post a review of it! 150-170mm is ideal for North SHore!

    $656 at AEBIKE.COM
     
  4. sanjuro

    sanjuro Tube Smuggler

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 0
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,472
    Location:
    SF
    The Fox is the king of air suspended forks. Their compression design uses less oil, which means less weight.

    Marzocchi in the past has had some issues with their Doppio forks, with the Marathon specifically.

    Since the 66SL is not out yet, it is hard to have a real opinion. I can't imagine there will be much difference, except in price (Fox being more expensive).
     
  5. dhmtbj

    dhmtbj Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    3 / 1
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Messages:
    469
    Location:
    Boston
    I absolutely love my 36...quality of travel, stiffness, and plushness are simply unreal. :thumb:
     
  6. Kntr

    Kntr Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 20
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    7,536
    Location:
    Montana

    I really cant see how a single crown can be stiffer than a DC. Please explain.
     
  7. Bicyclist

    Bicyclist Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2004
    Messages:
    10,159
    Location:
    SB
    Ummm, better internals and stiffer crown/stancions/lowers
     
  8. RobsterCrw

    RobsterCrw Chimp

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    Palo Alto, CA
    DCs are overrated. People think they want a DC fork for the sake of having a DC fork becasue they associate the SCs with trail and XC. FR/DH SCs need a beefier crown to be stiff as DCs but my 66RC was the best buy I've ever made. It rips at whistler, it rips at DH, its stiff enough that I can't tell if its not 100% stiff. I would never need anything else.
     
  9. Spokompton

    Spokompton Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    321
    Location:
    Spokane WA
    Thicker stanchions, period.

    That's how.


    Of course a 35mm SC will not be equal to a 35mm DC. 66 vs 888.

    The super T IMO, is actually pretty flexy for a DC fork front to rear wise.


    The new doppio air system was designed for huckers on the 66 SL.

    The new system requires much more air pressure in the negative chamber than the positive chamber, where as before they were pretty close. If any of the internal air spring seals break the high pressure air from the negative chmaber will spill into the positive chamber. It sucks the thing broke, but at the same time it will ride high in its travel because the negative spring has been released into the positive. So when it pops on a drop the fork will stay upright as apposed to collapsing and sending you over the bars. The older system would leak and get stuck down because the negative pressure was so close or below the positve pressure.

    Then you also have the bottom out chamber which is pretty much makes the 66sl an RC2x. If all else fails, this will keep the fork from slamming bottom.

    On top of that, the right leg can take air preload.


    They went out of their way to make sure it's a safe fork for hucking. On top of that it's completely user servicable.

    Unlike that goddamn TALAS system they put into the Fox 36. What a joke that was...
     
  10. Ridge Rider

    Ridge Rider Chimp

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    10
    I think you need to add the weight of the steer tube to the Marazocchi. They list the weight of the steer tube at the bottom of the weight chart
     
  11. Zark

    Zark Hey little girl, do you want some candy?

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 7
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2001
    Messages:
    6,256
    Location:
    High desert
    What year Super T did you ride? I had an '03 SuperT and it was quite stiff. Sounds like bad bushings or an older 30mm stanchion Super T.
     
  12. Spokompton

    Spokompton Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    321
    Location:
    Spokane WA
    Don't get me wrong. It's hella stiff, just not for a dual crown IMO.
     
  13. AlberTop

    AlberTop Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    4 / 0
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    218
    Location:
    South
    I'm using a 36 for sometime and love the thing.