But weighs just under a tonArrow dhx, 37mm external. A beast of a rim, served me well many years ago.
But weighs just under a tonArrow dhx, 37mm external. A beast of a rim, served me well many years ago.
It was Freeride mag. The wide rims created a tire profile in which the rim walls were right under the channel between braking and cornering knobs on tires such as HighRollers. Because of the missing protection from the knobs they ruined a set of rims on a couple of DH runs on rocks (they weren't even East Coast Rox). So Pegboy's suspicion is right.From what I managed to find and understand, rims dented quite easily.
It was Bike Magazine or Freeride test.
That's an unexpected epic failIt was Freeride mag. The wide rims created a tire profile in which the rim walls were right under the channel between braking and cornering knobs on tires such as HighRollers. Because of the missing protection from the knobs they ruined a set of rims on a couple of DH runs on rocks (they weren't even East Coast Rox). So Pegboy's suspicion is right.
Because they have held up better than other rims I have used. BTW, tons of people love their Deemax wheelsets, and aren't those 23mm wide internally?And all those rims are too narrow to give a tire over 2.1" a decent profile. These days most people consider sub 21mm to be purely XC, 23-25mm for AM, and 25+ for DH. The Spike 28 is an AM/Slopestyle rim. For DH people use the Subrosa 25mm or the Spike 29mm. Mavic is the only company stuck on narrow rims and besides a few loyal customers most of us don't get it.
With the following rims available:
Notubes Flow EX
WTB i25
Spank Subrosa
Spank Spike
Light Bicycles AM
Light Bicycles DH
The new Derby rims
Why would you buy anything from Mavic?
If not for the weight, pretty much this.729 + 2.5 minion dhf = the ultimate
I always used 2.7" DHFs, but yeah. Then I started experimenting with lighter rims and benefited from the acceleration but missed the width, stiffness, and strength of the old 729s. Now I'm using a carbon wheelset that's only 2mm narrower, stiffer, seats tubeless easier, and weighs just 1600g. Best of all worlds*!729 + 2.5 minion dhf = the ultimate
Which rims are you running?I always used 2.7" DHFs, but yeah. Then I started experimenting with lighter rims and benefited from the acceleration but missed the width, stiffness, and strength of the old 729s. Now I'm using a carbon wheelset that's only 2mm narrower, stiffer, seats tubeless easier, and weighs just 1600g. Best of all worlds*!
*Well, the jury's still out on strength but so far no problems.
Meh, just another low spoke count carbon XC wheelset. Plenty of those already to choose from. Of course this makes it obvious that a carbon Flow EX is somewhere down the line.and then there's the carbon Stans NoTubes rims... wonder how those will pan out.
slightly moar info, though nothing about price: http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/news/article/stans-notubes-valor-carbon-wheelset-introduced-38264/Meh, just another low spoke count carbon XC wheelset. Plenty of those already to choose from. Of course this makes it obvious that a carbon Flow EX is somewhere down the line.
FEATURES
SUP
FORE
Maxtal
Disc
UST Tubeless or Tubetype
under the manuals section. but maybe it doesn't apply to this particular product? (in which case, why have the manual listed on the product page?!???)Looks exactly like the rim on my crossmax sx wheels.
sly: where are you seeing anything about tape?
This is all I see
I am running this set up and it seems to work pretty well, except I keep bending the rear wheel and it's fairly dented up.729 + 2.5 minion dhf = the ultimate
this will work as a rear wheel, on an enduro bike, as advertisedAt 450g, this might be a bit too weak to work as a rear wheel? I'm only 160lb, but am still skeptical... For a front wheel it could be awesome though...
given mavic's maxtal construction and general 'stiff rim' history i think it will be ok - it is a trail rim after all, not a DH rim. i'm 170 and had an 819 cut through a tire sidewall on impact once. the rim had a tiny bent spot but was run fine for another 2 years and has been on my wife's bike for another 3.At 450g, this might be a bit too weak to work as a rear wheel? I'm only 160lb, but am still skeptical... For a front wheel it could be awesome though...
yupAnyways, tell me about your Crossmax SX wheels... do you run them tubeless? Do they keep a UST tire on? Do they dent easily, or are they more prone to cutting the tire than denting? Inquisitive minds need to know...
The 821's are 450g without the nipple inserts, with the inserts they are pretty much 500 g.450g? Same weight as 819? I wonder if that's a misprint or if they slimmed it down. Also wondering about asymmetry as 819s and 823s were/are not. My new CMax SXs are asymmetric, are older ones asymmetric too, or is this a change?
I'm not sure I wanna know what's popping in and out of the bottom left of your animated gif...
looks flexy !
sorry.