Quantcast

McCain: The Man Who Never Was

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
40,224
9,113
Nice writeup by Todd Purdum over at Vanity Fair:

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/11/mccain-201011

Too many quotable bits to include here but I'll include this gem of a paragraph:

The prevailing question about John McCain this year is: What happened? What happened to that other John McCain, the refreshingly unpredictable figure who stood apart from his colleagues and seemed to promise something better than politics as usual? The question may miss the point. It’s quite possible that nothing at all has changed about John McCain, a ruthless and self-centered survivor who endured five and a half years in captivity in North Vietnam, and who once told Torie Clarke that his favorite animal was the rat, because it is cunning and eats well. It’s possible to see McCain’s entire career as the story of a man who has lived in the moment, who has never stood for any overriding philosophy in any consistent way, and who has been willing to do all that it takes to get whatever it is he wants. He himself said, in the thick of his battle with Hayworth, “I’ve always done whatever’s necessary to win.” Maybe the rest of us just misunderstood.
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
Man, if JD Hayworth was the alternative, I would be ok if McCain married Palin to keep that idiot out of office.

This election season is convincing me the wrong people are too easily electable.
 

Silver

find me a tampon
Jul 20, 2002
10,840
1
Orange County, CA
I'm pretty sure, if you do a search, that you'll find a post from me saying that I would proud to have McCain as President.

I'd like to disown that opinion. McCain is a feckless idiot. The North Vietnamese should have killed him, the world would have been a better place, and I'd have a shot at rich beer heiress pussy.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
It's kind of like how Obama claims he's a christian and that he's against gay "marriage" just so he can get elected.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
If his father was someone else he'd be nothing. Even the military would have rejected him. I have a relative who is an instructor in the naval academy in Maryland, two years ago he wrote in regards to an article about him:

I have not had a chance to read this yet. But I wanted to write and tell you that the academy graduate (early 80's ?) 20 year+ marine former F-18 pilot that works in my office read the article and said that no one he knows that personally knows McCain would vote for him. And the very conservative former air force lifer also a pilot and also attended the naval academy (older guy there was no Airforce Academy when he went to school) very much dislikes McCain.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
So your're on of those "he's a Muslim types". Please tell us what country he was born in.

PS I'm just screwing with you mang.
No really, Im fairly certain he's agnostic. He's careful enough about what he says with regard to religion that it makes itself evident if you listen. It's always "the teachings of christ spoke to me" not "a voice from above directed me make this decision".

It's an important distinction. He also gave a shout out to the faithless in his victory speech in Grant Park which, Im fairly certain, has never been done by a president or future president before.

And the gay marriage thing... clearly this is pandering. I mean he won't challenge prop 8's overturn, he's trying to let gays serve openly in the military, etc. etc. But he'd never have been elected to the presidency without opposing gay marriage.

What Im saying is, these guys will all change what they say/believe in the interest of getting elected. McCain you can hate, whatever, but let's not act like he's the only guy doing this. Im sure many justify it by saying to themselve "If I can get across 90% of my agenda by lying about the other 10% then it's justified" and Im not so sure I disagree with that as a general principle.
 

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
42,365
19,892
Riding past the morgue.
No really, Im fairly certain he's agnostic. He's careful enough about what he says with regard to religion that it makes itself evident if you listen. It's always "the teachings of christ spoke to me" not "a voice from above directed me make this decision".

It's an important distinction. He also gave a shout out to the faithless in his victory speech in Grant Park which, Im fairly certain, has never been done by a president or future president before.

And the gay marriage thing... clearly this is pandering. I mean he won't challenge prop 8's overturn, he's trying to let gays serve openly in the military, etc. etc. But he'd never have been elected to the presidency without opposing gay marriage.

What Im saying is, these guys will all change what they say/believe in the interest of getting elected. McCain you can hate, whatever, but let's not act like he's the only guy doing this. Im sure many justify it by saying to themselve "If I can get across 90% of my agenda by lying about the other 10% then it's justified" and Im not so sure I disagree with that as a general principle.
:stupid:
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
43,520
15,730
Portland, OR
What Im saying is, these guys will all change what they say/believe in the interest of getting elected. McCain you can hate, whatever, but let's not act like he's the only guy doing this. Im sure many justify it by saying to themselve "If I can get across 90% of my agenda by lying about the other 10% then it's justified" and Im not so sure I disagree with that as a general principle.
I honestly think McCain is just straight old, though. It takes a lot of energy to go against your party, he's too old to get all mavericky and stuff.

But I think the other guys are more like 75/25 and are happy if they get 50% done. All you need it 51% to win, right?
 

rockofullr

confused
Jun 11, 2009
7,342
924
East Bay, Cali
No really, Im fairly certain he's agnostic. He's careful enough about what he says with regard to religion that it makes itself evident if you listen. It's always "the teachings of christ spoke to me" not "a voice from above directed me make this decision".
Interesting, but not all christians are George W types who think that God talks to them. Also if he is just faking it, why choose a church with a crazy nutcase at the pulpit? Wouldn't it be more politically expedient to have chosen a more mainstream church?

And the gay marriage thing... clearly this is pandering. I mean he won't challenge prop 8's overturn, he's trying to let gays serve openly in the military, etc. etc. But he'd never have been elected to the presidency without opposing gay marriage.

What Im saying is, these guys will all change what they say/believe in the interest of getting elected. McCain you can hate, whatever, but let's not act like he's the only guy doing this. Im sure many justify it by saying to themselve "If I can get across 90% of my agenda by lying about the other 10% then it's justified" and Im not so sure I disagree with that as a general principle.
True. There is also the concept that elected officials, at some point need to be the representatives of their constituents and not just the representatives of their own beliefs.
 
Last edited: