He dresses like me at work, only I'm not rich.that obama dude has all the style of a rich white nerd
He dresses like me at work, only I'm not rich.that obama dude has all the style of a rich white nerd
that obama dude has all the style of a rich white nerd
What would your ideal candidate wear? Pink silk shirts with popped collars and Mo-Rocca glasses?
bush was a much cooler biker than obamaYou can immediately verify that a right wing nutjob is incapable of intelligent conversation when he resorts to things like making fun of a candidate's choice of biking clothes.
No doubt. The BEST thing you can ever do for a guy who lost his legs in a pointless war is make him run with you, too.bush was a much cooler biker than obama
u can cry now.
KERRY was a much cooler biker than obama. i mean, c'mon - a comfort bike? at least bush was rockin' a trek (fuel?)bush was a much cooler biker than obama
u can cry now.
testify brotha!!!No doubt. The BEST thing you can ever do for a guy who lost his legs in a pointless war is make him run with you, too.
Next, Bush is having a mandatory working party of disabled vets to clear some brush on his ranch. What a pal!
McCain's about as much a liberal as Hillary is a woman.i am trying to decide which of the two liberal democrat canidates to vote for this election...
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aH8EMkkeMCtw&refer=worldwide
McCain is a lib, hell he was damn close to being Kerry's running mate last time around.. come on..McCain's about as much a liberal as obama is black.
Damn close doesn't make you ghey. You of all people should know that.McCain is a lib, hell he was damn close to being Kerry's running mate last time around.. come on..
know what?Damn close doesn't make you ghey. You of all people should know that.
Complaint filed with FEC against McCain campaign
Associated Press - June 9, 2008 6:23 PM ET
WASHINGTON (AP) - A group with Democratic ties is urging the Federal Election Commission to examine two financial transactions involving several officials of John McCain's campaign.
Campaign Money Watch is raising questions about payments from a former finance chairman of McCain's to the campaign finance director. It's also wary about the reduction of a debt to a company that is co-owned by McCain's campaign manager. The group suspects "serious conflict of interest questions."
The McCain campaign says the complaint is "baseless," and that everything was carefully reviewed by lawyers. A spokesman says the payments were for legitimate work, and is confident the FEC will toss the complaint.
Campaign Money Watch is also running an ad in the Washington, D.C., area questioning McCain's role concerning an Air Force contract for a refueling tanker.
and obama now:The Obama Campaign Criticized Sen. Clinton For Accepting Contributions From Representatives Of Countrywide. "Obama aides also said Clinton is in no position to stiffen oversight after taking contributions from mortgage industry lobbyists, including funds from representatives of Countrywide, which has been at the center of the mortgage meltdown. 'If we're really going to crack down on the practices that caused the credit and housing crises, we're going to need a leader who doesn't owe these industries any favors,' campaign manager David Plouffe said."
James Johnson, one of three people tapped by Mr. Obama recently to oversee the search for his running mate, took at least five real estate loans totaling more than $7 million from Countrywide Financial Corp. through an informal program for friends of the company's CEO, Angelo Mozilo, the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday. The Journal said at least two of the mortgages, among a series of loans made available to people Countrywide officials called "friends of Angelo," were at rates below market averages, though it is difficult to predict a market rate without access to nonpublic information about a borrower's credit history and other factors that can reduce interest charges on a loan.
Among the loans to Mr. Johnson, according to the Journal, were a $5 million home equity line of credit against a house in Ketchum, Idaho, a 5.25% loan of $1.3 million for a home in Palm Desert, Calif., and a 3.875% loan of $971,650 for a home in Washington, D.C. The interest rates applied for the first five years of the loans.
"That reeks most high," a public relations specialist and vocal critic of Mr. Mozilo, Bonnie Russell of Del Mar, Calif., said. "Where's the 'change to believe in' if they're playing the same old game using the same old players?"
On the campaign trail, Mr. Obama has criticized Countrywide's executives. "These are the people who are responsible for infecting the economy and helping to create a home foreclosure crisis. Two million people may end up losing their homes," Mr. Obama said in March at a town hall meeting in Lancaster, Pa.
The Chicago Tribune reported that the senator from Illinois "fumed" over a total of $19 million in bonuses set to be paid to Mr. Mozilo and the president of Countrywide, David Sambol. "They get a $19 million bonus while people are at risk of losing their home. What's wrong with this picture?" Mr. Obama asked.
In a written statement issued in March, the senator called the payments "an outrage" and suggested Mr. Mozilo and others had "tricked" homeowners into unaffordable loans. "These executives crossed the line to boost their bottom line," Mr. Obama declared.
A spokesman for the Republican National Committee, Danny Diaz, yesterday called the loans to Mr. Johnson "highly questionable" and said they conflicted with Mr. Obama's public comments. "Barack Obama needs to immediately address this matter; otherwise, his rhetoric will continue to prove to be nothing more than complete hypocrisy," Mr. Diaz said.
Aides to Mr. Obama had no immediate response yesterday afternoon to a request for comment for this article. An attorney for Mr. Johnson, Brian Brooks, did not respond to e-mail and telephone messages seeking comment yesterday. However, in a statement to the Journal, Mr. Brooks defended the loans as "well within the band of standard industry practices with regard to price and structure of loans to borrowers of Mr. Johnson's background."
If I was that close to Georgie with a 10lb sledgehammer while he slept I wouldn't be aiming at his feet.^
^
I'd go cathy bates on him and take a 10lb sledgehammer to his feet while he slept.
My favorite part is when Malkin as claiming that thus far the Republican attacks against Michelle Obama have been focused on the substance of her public statements, and have not resorted to personal attacks, while the caption below her reads "Malkin call Michelle Obama "Obama's Bitter Half."Future First "Baby Mama"?
Thank you, Fox news.
The Republicans ought to just start referring to Obama as "The uppity N*****"
It's getting a little old watching them attempt to come up with new ways to imply it without actually saying it. I mean, if you're going to be a racist, at least be proud of it. It's part of your American heritage.
McCain says the United States has 21 billion barrels of proven oil reserves which are not being tapped because of a federal moratorium on exploration and production.
"I believe it is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions and to put our own reserves to use," he will say. "We can do this in ways that are consistent with sensible standards of environmental protection."
Saying "drill for more oil" as his plan for action is inconsistent and disappointing. Tapping domestic sources of oil is more of a solution to the trade deficit. This is a worldwide energy market and drilling "American oil" will make little to no difference in price, domestic oil just keeps the money in our economy. Cutting our energy use is the only real way to cut our energy cost."In the face of climate change and other serious challenges, energy conservation is no longer just a moral luxury or a personal virtue," he will say. "Conservation serves a critical national goal."
Well, also:Although it is good to hear him say this:
Saying "drill for more oil" as his plan for action is inconsistent and disappointing. Tapping domestic sources of oil is more of a solution to the trade deficit. This is a worldwide energy market and drilling "American oil" will make little to no difference in price, domestic oil just keeps the money in our economy. Cutting our energy use is the only real way to cut our energy cost.
That is heartening to hear, but probably just lip service at this point. And by the way, he is also an idiot for going on and on about how we need to cut the federal gas tax for a while.McCain backs federal subsidies for building more nuclear power plants, which he considers the best way to reduce U.S. carbon dioxide emissions.
Well, also:
That is heartening to hear, but probably just lip service at this point. And by the way, he is also an idiot for going on and on about how we need to cut the federal gas tax for a while.
I mean, it's 18 cents. That'd save me less than $4 per fill up in a 20 gal tank. Or in other words... nothing substantial.
But what's ironic is that, as republicans have become known for lately, he's talking about cutting taxes and at the same time backing more federal subsidies. Yet more debt, I guess.
Imagine all the jobs (engineers, construction, architects, security, janitors, etc. etc.) if a bunch of nuclear plants popped up. I think some places would be happy to have them. NIMBYism is a pain in the ass, but that whole imminent domain thing has been exercised before. And plus we have Texas as a perfect dumping ground for any waste.Nuclear would be good and I would like to see it pushed by an administration. It will still be difficult because of the Not In My Backyard crowd and environmental groups that can't see the forest for the trees. The whole cut taxes and spend thing is the main reason why I can not support McCain, bread and circus is all it is.
That goes for any domestic power source, though. If we had large solar/wind/water sites, you would create nearly the same number of jobs only with less waste.Imagine all the jobs (engineers, construction, architects, security, janitors, etc. etc.) if a bunch of nuclear plants popped up.
Yeah, it just seems so obvious that we should be producing, employing, using and paying for all this stuff within our borders. F***cking coal mining makes me sick, even though it is done domestically, becuase of what's happening to the mountains.That goes for any domestic power source, though. If we had large solar/wind/water sites, you would create nearly the same number of jobs only with less waste.
I like the idea of SOME nuclear plants, but money should be spent on all alternatives. Coal and oil get us into trouble, so multiple options leave us open to multiple solutions.
The whole "Not in our backyard" issue goes with prisons, too. I know when Oregon wanted to build one, everyone was up in arms about it except for east Oregon towns that need revenue. I would thing the same approach can be used if the idea of jobs are pitched with it.
After watching a documentary (posted a few weeks ago) on coal, I was pissed beyond words. It sure as hell motivated me to see what happens during mountain top removal.Yeah, it just seems so obvious that we should be producing, employing, using and paying for all this stuff within our borders. F***cking coal mining makes me sick, even though it is done domestically, becuase of what's happening to the mountains.
Ironically though, did you know that wildlife is actually flourishing around chernobyl these days? So even in a "disaster" however unlikely that may be, it doesn't turn out as bad as what's going on in the coal mining areas.
But even the experts say if we started drilling today we wouldn't see oil out of ANWAR for at least 5 more years. That's why things like solar are more important IMO because of the turn around time to offset some of the energy.We've waited so long to hop on nuclear that we'll need ANWAR to bridge the 5-10 year gap for plants to come online if we want to avoid (more) serious economic collapse.
But even the experts say if we started drilling today we wouldn't see oil out of ANWAR for at least 5 more years. That's why things like solar are more important IMO because of the turn around time to offset some of the energy.