from what i heard he was meerly testing the ride, to give feedback etc.I agree, I remember an interview in pinnd about him riding the legend this year
1. What you mean to say is that whether or not you have ridden the bike in question has no impact on the potential validity of your "points." The actual validity of your points is another matter entirely.The points I'm arguing are valid whether I've ridden the bike or not.
You haven't got a piss in the wind at a to counter anything I've said except "you have never rode (ridden?) the bike". If you're going to come back with a counter argument to my points then do, otherwise don't give me all this 'you haven't ridden the bike' crap.
3. As others have pointed out, the most logical main goal in long travel suspension bicycle design would be to make a fun, efficient platform that the rider can control. Delivering control and efficiency is not the same as "isolating the rider from terrain".Yes you're right the design will 'combat chain growth'. If that was a priority of the designer then it was a success. However, it was ONLY a success if chain growth was more important than isolating the rider from the movement of the suspension. I would have thought that isolating the rider from the terrain they are riding over would be the priority or main design criteria of any bicycle suspension designer ? Especially with DH bikes.
Yes I haven't ridden the bike but I have ridden URT's in the past. I even knew some people who actually liked them. At the time it was claimed by the proponents of URT designs that you shouldn't criticise them until you had ridden them. However, a widespread increase in the knowledge of the consumer and marketing by other companies offering other designs caused the URT to become almost extinct. Using your reasoning, even if on paper a URT design appears flawed, riders who are newer to the sport who perhaps encounter a proponent of URT's (maybe even a highly respected member of this forum) should ride a URT before formulating an opinion that on paper the design is totally flawed ?
If that were the case then there would be no such thing as progressional theoretical in the bike industry. Every new bike company would have to make prototypes of every type of suspension design that's come and gone. As real world testing of a product would be the only indication of performance.
Neethling won a National in 2005 on a Turner...a national with a lot of big dogs there (Mick, Greg Minnaar, Kirkaldie, etc...) He has not WON a major race on the mongoose. He has more consistent results on a mongoose, but perhaps that is maturity AND the fact Goose pays for ALL his expenses to EVERY race and a nice salary vs his Turner HONDA days that were on a shoestring budget. Plus Needles has moved on to another team.Uh we do know that. Needles has had better results on his mongoose than he did before on his DHR, wildly different bikes. It is also clear that he is much more confident on it as well from watching him ride.
he was just testing the frame & riding it for the Angelfire Burner race. I also stated that he was still looking for a ride for '09 (at that time)I agree, I remember an interview in pinnd about him riding the legend this year
I can't wait to hear your first crash report from your new bike.JLC you are getting owned by everyone including EC and people who are very picky about what bikes they like. I personally have ridden VPP's, DW links, FSR's, 4 bars, and single pivots and owned a fsr and 4 bar and a single pivot and the mongoose was my favorite. Get out there and ride one, then come bitch about how it doesn't work if you still don't like it.
Can you tell us what team is?. Plus Needles has moved on to another team.
Just sayin....
Your daughter has a race team now??? What kind of allowance are you giving that kid?but perhaps that is maturity AND the fact Goose pays for ALL his expenses to EVERY race and a nice salary.
Just sayin....
it has not been announced yet what team he will be going to?Can you tell us what team is?
My crash reports are epic. Hopefully there will be less of those next year. Let's say complete 10 races with out crashing. That would be amazing. I only completed one with out something going wrong this year. Damn tree's.I can't wait to hear your first crash report from your new bike.
stik, that right there is funny!Your daughter has a race team now??? What kind of allowance are you giving that kid?
HAHA
And the choir goes wild....Sometimes it's better when you don't know all of the technical mumbo jumbo because you don't think about it so much. You just ride it.
Correct, if my old-style DHi died today I'd go and buy a Mongoose (since the carbon GT won't be available till at least April).that bike isn't a whole lot different from an i-drive, and it's widely accepted that the original dh-i was one of the best platforms to come along in the short history of dh racing.
Sorry but i dont know if someone has commented on this all ready but I agree! the Boot'r build is amazing most people would be stoked to get that nice of a build, w/o frame, for that price. You are getting a WC race proven bike for that price. Its is super sweet to see Mongoose doing this, it is really great for our sport.It's far more likely that this is a mongoose shill drumming up support for the ECD. Just look at the effects. A few negative comments, and a fleet of knowledgeable posters come to the frame's defense. This couldn't happen of course without a solid design, and though I've never ridden one, I think these cheaper highish end, high volume bikes are great for the sport.
Nugget might be around 2800does anyone know the retail price on the
Nugget?
Boot'R Team?