looser...maybe she can hang herself in the cell.....
fvckin dumb@ss.
looser...maybe she can hang herself in the cell.....
fvckin dumb@ss.
bingo. I've lived in 5 different states (and different regions within some of them) on both coasts of the US. I've met more mountain bikers that are tokers than aren't. So you "clean livin" wankers are the exception, not the rule.mountain biking was founded by pot heads living on the fringe of society, and it is the pot heads that are progressing this sport.
LMFAO. You guys are the awesomest. With air-tight logic like you demonstrate here, thanks for reminding me why I'm a 'clean livin' wanker'.
--JP
...and this fact seems to somehow matter in some way.Also, busted for drugs or not Missy is still faster than 99% of the people here.
Well at least it was pot not crack, or we'd have to restart all the old Cannondale "crackanfail" jokes again. :lol:Ole Team Volvo Cannondale = 0 for 2 at dealing drugs.
This comparison is completely invalid. Doing something you know is illegal and getting arrested for it, isnt anywhere near the same thing as seeing another rider laying on the ground.For all of you who say "take the risk, accept the consequences," that's extremely cold. The world is a risky place, biking is a risky sport, and we all calculate what we can get away with. Sometimes we get it wrong. If I saw one of you lying shattered next to the trail, I know I would stop and help. Yeah, you made a bad decision and I'm free to say "bad luck bro" and ride on but I would still be a dick for doing it.
While I agree totally with you (and pot is one of the cartels biggest cash crops), they were busted in New York. Which means the weed was either from upstate NY, Vermont, or Canada. I went to college in Rochester, and that's where all of ours came from.Clay: Marijuana dealing is not always a victimless crime. If the weed is brought over the border, trafficked by cartels, then does the dealer and the final consumers not bare some responsibility if innocent people are killed in Mexico, South America, etc as a result of the growing/smuggling process. Just sayin.
the trails I ride a not illegal. weed is.if you're argument is that she should pay the price for doing something illegal, than get the fyck off your mountain bike, as the best mountain bike trails were made illegally.
Yes go ROMEY!Jim Rome is going to hit this subject today on his radio show. I'm almost positive it will not be supportive.
It wasn't morally wrong, dumbass. It was LEGALLY wrong. Let her rot in jail until the jail falls down then build another jail and throw her in that one....the way i see it, people wouldn't be getting killed or having their lives ruined if it weren't for the drug war. they are definitely not victims of the drug or victims of non-violent drug traffickers. they're victims of the government and the violent criminals that are willing to challenge it. in general, I don't think you can justify holding one person responsible for the acts of others. it's a classic slippery slope. unless missy was out kneecapping her competitors or pushing to grade school kids its pretty hard to argue that there is something morally wrong with what she did. it may have been a bad idea, but that's a different argument.
I hope she does!mugshot rules....she has a look of "F YOU COPS, I AM GETTING AWAY WITH THIS"
no?
also...
she says this was planted! wow
FYP^^^ ILLEGAL weed = violence
Yes I do hope she 'gets away' with it.^ you hope she get's away?
wow
the very reason I started the website freemissy.com
because people are dumb.
You don't get to pick and chose what laws you obey because you don't happen to agree with some of them.
I think the speed limit should be 150mph in school zones. Chances are, I could get pulled over.
Do you see something morally wrong with marijuana use? I do not. I do know molestation is wrong.The NAMBLA folks seem to think there is nothing "morally" wrong with touching kids either...
-ska todd
When you get caught driving a vehicle carrying Rosie O'donnel's weight in pot, you don't have a side of the story.And despite the presumption, and conveyed story - no one has been convicted, she hasnt put out her side of the story
You know the story? Are you certain this is the case? Do you always take the media and government at face value?When you get caught driving a vehicle carrying Rosie O'donnel's weight in pot, you don't have a side of the story.
no different than what the Mob did during prohibition.As others have said, if you want a protest a law, protest it. Distributing 400# of ganja ain't protesting it's profiteering.
-ska todd
Yes, but were they right at the time for doing it? It's glorified now and looked back on a couple generations later as freewheeling defiance, but lots of people got shot up and killed over it then.no different than what the Mob did during prohibition.
I don't know if I would say they weren't right for doing it, but what they were doing was certainly illegal in the eyes of the law. Prohibition turned many people into criminals, many of whom were non-violent (and only became criminals once the laws were put into effect). The violence arose amongst those who were producing and distributing it.Yes, but were they right at the time for doing it? It's glorified now and looked back on a couple generations later as freewheeling defiance, but lots of people got shot up and killed over it then.
FDR repealed Prohibition and some saw it as one of the ways to get the nation out of the funk of the Depression. Maybe Barack needs to repeal the pot laws to kick start the economy
-ska todd
One thing people forget is that laws change. A Canadian snowboarder who won a Gold Medal failed the drug test for pot. The ruling was changed, he kept his medal and several Canadian officials openly supported marijuana.HB - Do I personally think weed is immoral? No. Am I the law? No. The law wins.
I'm just demonstrating that just b/c you might think something is "immoral" doesn't give you any excuse to flaunt the law. This wasn't like she was pulled over for speeding and they found a pipe and a little baggie. This was a trailer full.
As others have said, if you want a protest a law, protest it. Distributing 400# of ganja ain't protesting it's profiteering.
-ska todd
So - morality and law ARE 2 different entities but are NOT mutually exclusive. The two are used to reinforce each other.Law versus Morality as Regulators of Conduct
Steven Shavell
Harvard Law School
Send correspondence to: Steven Shavell, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA 02138; Fax: (617) 496-2256; E-mail: shavell@law.harvard.edu.
Abstract
It is evident that both law and morality serve to channel our behavior. Law accomplishes this primarily through the threat of sanctions if we disobey legal rules. Morality too involves incentives: bad acts may result in guilt and disapprobation, and good acts may result in virtuous feelings and praise. These two very different avenues of effect on our actions are examined in this article from an instrumental perspective. The analysis focuses on various social costs associated with law and morality, and on their effectiveness, as determined by the magnitude and likelihood of sanctions and by certain informational factors. After the relative character of law and of morality as means of control of conduct is assessed, consideration is given to their theoretically optimal domainsto where morality alone would appear to be best to control behavior, to where morality and the law would likely be advantageous to employ jointly, and to where solely the law would seem desirable to utilize. The observed pattern of use of morality and of law is discussed, and it is tentatively suggested that the observed and the optimal patterns are in rough alignment with one another.