Quantcast

More War Stuff...Burly - I know you have a comment

Jr_Bullit

I'm sooo teenie weenie!!!
Sep 8, 2001
2,028
1
North of Oz
:)

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040430/tv_nm/media_nightline_dc_6

Sinclair Stations to Boycott 'Nightline' Tribute
Thu Apr 29, 9:13 PM ET Add Entertainment - Reuters TV to My Yahoo!


By Steve Gorman

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A major television chain, the Sinclair Broadcast Group, will bar its ABC-affiliated stations from airing a planned "Nightline" tribute to fallen U.S. troops in Iraq (news - web sites), saying the program is a political statement disguised as news.

ABC News plans to devote Friday's entire "Nightline" segment to the tribute, with anchor Ted Koppel reading aloud the names of hundreds of fallen American servicemen and women as their photographs are shown.


The network's intentions drew a denunciation from Sinclair, a Baltimore-based owner of 62 television stations in 39 markets reaching roughly 24 percent of U.S. television households.


Sinclair said the "Nightline" segment "appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq."


In a statement posted on its Web site, the broadcast group accused Koppel and his show of seeking to "highlight only one aspect of the war effort and in doing so to influence public opinion against the military action in Iraq."


An ABC News spokeswoman said Sinclair's decision to preempt Friday's "Nightline" on its stations would remove the program in at least seven markets -- St. Louis, Missouri; Columbus, Ohio; Charleston, West Virginia; Pensacola, Florida; Springfield, Massachusetts and Asheville and Winston-Salem, North Carolina.


Sticking to its plans, ABC News issued its own statement defending the planned broadcast as "an expression of respect which simply seeks to honor those who have laid down their lives for this country."


In an interview with Internet media report Poynteronline, Koppel himself rejected the notion that he was out to make a political point.


"Just look at these people. Look at their names. And look at their ages. Consider what they've done for you. Honor them," Koppel said. "I truly believe that people will take away from this program the reflection of what they bring to it."


Sinclair's boycott drew a sharp rebuke from U.S. Rep. Maurice Hinchey, a New York Democrat and leading congressional critic of newly relaxed media ownership regulations adopted last year by the Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites).


"The decision by Sinclair ... to keep this program off its stations is being made by a corporation with a political agenda without regard to the wants or needs of its viewers," Hinchey said. "This move may be providing a chilling look into the future if we allow media ownership to be consolidated into fewer and fewer hands."


The Washington-based liberal think tank the Center for American Progress cited campaign contribution reports showing Sinclair executives have donated more than $130,000 to President Bush (news - web sites) and his political allies since 2000.


The network initially said the 30-minute telecast would be limited acknowledging only the 523 U.S. troops killed in combat since the start of the war in March 3002. But on Thursday, ABC said it would expand the program to 40 minutes to include another 200 or more Americans who died as a result of accidents, friendly fire or suicide.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
people keep accusing the media of having a political agenda when I suspect they only have a profit agenda.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
To be honest, I really think it'd be hard to show anything featuring the US military these days without it being Pro-Bush, simply because most military people really support what the man is doing.
If this broadcast co. is making the statement that they're not going to run this because its pro-Bush, than I guess that makes a statement about them doesnt it?
 

Tenchiro

Attention K Mart Shoppers
Jul 19, 2002
5,407
0
New England
In a statement posted on its Web site, the broadcast group accused Koppel and his show of seeking to "highlight only one aspect of the war effort and in doing so to influence public opinion against the military action in Iraq."
It seems to me that they are only trying to bring to light a neglected ascpect of the war. Putting names to the dead will make this war alot more personal to the average american. It is about time that has happened, no matter what feelings it conjurs.

We are far too detatched as Americans from what our government is doing aboad in our name.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
Originally posted by Tenchiro
It seems to me that they are only trying to bring to light a neglected ascpect of the war. Putting names to the dead...
do you think they'd be doing it if the lead marketing with regards to the photographed coffins hadn't happened?
 

Tenchiro

Attention K Mart Shoppers
Jul 19, 2002
5,407
0
New England
Originally posted by LordOpie
do you think they'd be doing it if the lead marketing with regards to the photographed coffins hadn't happened?
I have no idea, although the timing of this certainly points inthat direction. Whether that is a bad thing or not I don't know, but I think we do have a right as citizens to see all aspects of this war, not just what the government wants us to.
 

biggins

Rump Junkie
May 18, 2003
7,173
9
Originally posted by BurlySurly
To be honest, I really think it'd be hard to show anything featuring the US military these days without it being Pro-Bush, simply because most military people really support what the man is doing.
If this broadcast co. is making the statement that they're not going to run this because its pro-Bush, than I guess that makes a statement about them doesnt it?
i think that it is being pulled because they are accused of not supporting the war. i think that the broadcast company supports bush and the war but the show does not that is why they are not showing it.

you know in reality i think i am so tired of this political crap and this election and this war that i am over it. i dont really care who wins or loses or even who dies as long as it ends sometime soon.:devil:
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Originally posted by LordOpie
people keep accusing the media of having a political agenda when I suspect they only have a profit agenda.
BAM!

political is casual, not causal.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Originally posted by biggins
i think that it is being pulled because they are accused of not supporting the war. i think that the broadcast company supports bush and the war but the show does not that is why they are not showing it.
D'oh!:D

Read that wrong.

Well, in that case they're just not running it because its factually incorrect. We should be in Iraq right now.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
...and also, for you guys that were complaining about how the Iraq casualties are being swept under the blanket and that no one understands what's going on over there, WELL, here ya go, and ya have ya selfs to blame.
 

Spud

Monkey
Aug 9, 2001
550
0
Idaho (no really!)
John McCain wrote a letter to Sinclair.

Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) issued the following letter today to Mr. David Smith, President and CEO of Sinclair Broadcast Group, in response to the preemption of this evening's Nightline program:

I write to strongly protest your decision to instruct Sinclair's ABC affiliates to preempt this evening's Nightline program. I find deeply offensive Sinclair's objection to Nightline's intention to broadcast the names and photographs of Americans who gave their lives in service to our country in Iraq.

I supported the President's decision to go to war in Iraq, and remain a strong supporter of that decision. But every American has a responsibility to understand fully the terrible costs of war and the extraordinary sacrifices it requires of those brave men and women who volunteer to defend the rest of us; lest we ever forget or grow insensitive to how grave a decision it is for our government to order Americans into combat. It is a solemn responsibility of elected officials to accept responsibility for our decision and its consequences, and, with those who disseminate the news, to ensure that Americans are fully informed of those consequences.

There is no valid reason for Sinclair to shirk its responsibility in what I assume is a very misguided attempt to prevent your viewers from completely appreciating the extraordinary sacrifices made on their behalf by Americans serving in Iraq. War is an awful, but sometimes necessary business. Your decision to deny your viewers an opportunity to be reminded of war's terrible costs, in all their heartbreaking detail, is a gross disservice to the public, and to the men and women of the United States Armed Forces. It is, in short, sir, unpatriotic. I hope it meets with the public opprobrium it most certainly deserves