Hi I know this question gets asked constantly and that there is no right answer but I was wondering what anyone would reccomend for me to get as a first mountain bike in many years. I owned an old trek 850 probably 10 years ago and sold it probably 6 years ago. So i know that I like riding. I will probably do mostly xc riding with a little bit of trail and not much jumping. I want to get something that is going to last, something that isn't going to have slightly bent wheels after a bit of off road riding or just going off of curbs. I now weigh about 180 lbs.
I know that I probably don't need full suspension but I just feel like I want it. I remember when I had that old trek I longed for a full suspension bike and I don't want to get a ht and then be sorry later on. Would a ht with a decent midlevel fork provide a decent experience when I go off road and are the wheels today stronger than those that were on my old trek. I would think that a full suspension would help keep the rear wheels from stressing so much.
I just don't know what to pick, I have been looking at kona's, giant's, specialized's, and trek's. They all have decent midlevel models and I just cant' pick between them. I don't know which one will provide the best experience. I am hoping of course to spend as little as possible but want somethign that will last and that I will like riding. I just dont' feel right about asking a shop to let me take a bike out and test ride it either, incase I would have an accident on it or something and I just would feel weird asking period.
I was thinking of just getting a 400 or so dollar ht and then selling it in a couple of months and getting a nice full suspension when I have more money but I dont' know what kind of value a bike will hold. I don't wan't to lose a whole lot when I sell the first bike to get the second bike, if the loss is going to be great then I might as well just save for the better bike right away but I want to ride as soon as possible. I can afford a more expensive bike right now but I don't think a 7 or 8 hundred dollar full suspension will be of a good enough quality.
Man I think I am rambling I know that this decision is probably pretty subjective but it cant' hurt to ask other people's opinions I think.
and I also don't know where the cutoff point is for weight/reliability. I could care less about saving a few pounds and I know that at some point your paying more for saving weight and many times that weight saving comes at the expense of component reliability. So how do you determine it?
I know that I probably don't need full suspension but I just feel like I want it. I remember when I had that old trek I longed for a full suspension bike and I don't want to get a ht and then be sorry later on. Would a ht with a decent midlevel fork provide a decent experience when I go off road and are the wheels today stronger than those that were on my old trek. I would think that a full suspension would help keep the rear wheels from stressing so much.
I just don't know what to pick, I have been looking at kona's, giant's, specialized's, and trek's. They all have decent midlevel models and I just cant' pick between them. I don't know which one will provide the best experience. I am hoping of course to spend as little as possible but want somethign that will last and that I will like riding. I just dont' feel right about asking a shop to let me take a bike out and test ride it either, incase I would have an accident on it or something and I just would feel weird asking period.
I was thinking of just getting a 400 or so dollar ht and then selling it in a couple of months and getting a nice full suspension when I have more money but I dont' know what kind of value a bike will hold. I don't wan't to lose a whole lot when I sell the first bike to get the second bike, if the loss is going to be great then I might as well just save for the better bike right away but I want to ride as soon as possible. I can afford a more expensive bike right now but I don't think a 7 or 8 hundred dollar full suspension will be of a good enough quality.
Man I think I am rambling I know that this decision is probably pretty subjective but it cant' hurt to ask other people's opinions I think.
and I also don't know where the cutoff point is for weight/reliability. I could care less about saving a few pounds and I know that at some point your paying more for saving weight and many times that weight saving comes at the expense of component reliability. So how do you determine it?