This douche bag (Goss) didn't seem all that concerned a couple months back when an agent's identity was leaked. His contention is that if it was an accident, so be it. If it was willful disregard, he'd be all over it.
WTF? Why does it matter how it got leaked? Shouldn't it be investigated either way? I'm not really sure how any leak of this kind can be considered an accident... how do you put a field agent's life at risk, not to mention her family? Either way, the leak should be discovered and fixed.
How can a man who doesn't care about the safety of field agents be put in charge?
Also...
WTF? Why does it matter how it got leaked? Shouldn't it be investigated either way? I'm not really sure how any leak of this kind can be considered an accident... how do you put a field agent's life at risk, not to mention her family? Either way, the leak should be discovered and fixed.
How can a man who doesn't care about the safety of field agents be put in charge?
Also...
In March Goss told left-wing filmmaker Michael Moore: "It is true I was a case officer, clandestine services officer, and yes, I do understand the core mission of the business. But I couldn't get a job with the CIA today. I am not qualified."