Status is a better name than the DemoDemo replaced by Status.
Marketing nightmare as demo sounds like a prototype meanwhile Status is the top dog.
it gave me idea that the magnitude of marketing team in Specialized figured out that youngsters who cannot afford fancy 9000$ Demo would buy Status budget bikes because that fancy word is convincing enough.Status sounds like a Walmart bike trying to make poor kids feel good
That's what our rep said when they came out with the Demo 9 originally. Why you'd want to ride a DH bike at Demo is beyond me.*is it correct? the name demo is from the demo forest near spez HQ?
There are a trillion of them as rentals in Whistler.I don't think I've ever seen a status outside the shop, in the flesh.
A fine bike, I'm sure, but have they sold one yet?
Huh. Shows what I know...There are a trillion of them as rentals in Whistler.
Totally impossibleSo then it is true the Demo isnt capable of getting to the top step of a wc? I mean the Gwinominator could only get it by tapping into the enduro power....
also trueHuh. Shows what I know...
Last time I paid attention it was a trillion Glorys.
I've seen a ton at local DH races on the east coast. For a season or two it seemed like the bike of choice for Groms. I'm pretty sure the Shaw Brothers won about 104903 races combined on tricked out Statuses (stati?)I don't think I've ever seen a status outside the shop, in the flesh.
A fine bike, I'm sure, but have they sold one yet?
For anyone that is not named Sam Hill that is?Totally impossible
Don't even try.
That just looked like a Demo with the Ohlins shock.What was that thing that Brad Benedict was spotted on in Whistler last year? Shelved?
I had a 'last generation before the current' version and have ridden one of the current ones. I think this more than anything would benefit those bikes the most. It's not short chainstays that hurt them, it's short chainstays combined with with an early forward arcing axle path. You could screw with either to get it to hang up a little less. You know how good those bikes feel yanking out of tight corners on your rear wheel though. That is certainly NOT a design flaw for going fast.For anyone that is not named Sam Hill that is?
Seriously though, I had a 2011 Demo and good god it was a fun and easy to ride. Wonder what S have developed from it. A few less stays/pivots and more rearward travel would be high on my list
He's talking about the bb pivot bike with the huge Horst link. I was wondering about that thing the other day, too.That just looked like a Demo with the Ohlins shock.
If it's on the rebound what's the problem? The bigger problem is when the axle path gradient changes rapidly and the chain goes from very stretched to very loose.I'm still not completely sold on the be all end all of rearward axle paths though. When you're going through successive hits that wheel is hitting things on the way down too. Any heavily rearward compression path is going to have a nasty forward rebound path wanting to hammer on your wheel.
Certainly not as bad as a compression hit out of nowhere but the wheel is moving forward as it hits something........the inverse of a forward axle path on compression.If it's on the rebound what's the problem?
Well long time ago they claimed that the vertical axle path meant their bikes gained speed as they went over obstacles. The 12 year old me believed they invented a new kind of root and rock powered engine.Certainly not as bad as a compression hit out of nowhere but the wheel is moving forward as it hits something........the inverse of a forward axle path on compression.
That's all irrelevant though because I read in a specialized ad that FSRs have a completely vertical axle path
Have a look at http://fotos.mtb-news.de/p/1611887Sneaky sneaky Specialized - what better place to whip it out, when it's going to be entirely covered in mud?
Either that, or they wanted larger mud clearance, so sticking 650B forks on a 26" wheel seems like a good idea to me.