Not at all. I already bought a 38. It feels amazing (both air spring and cartridge) but I would like a pinch bolt or 4 and a 20mm axle. Not a deal breaker. I like to try all this stuff myself rather than theorize people based from experiences with my Judy DH, 66 and White Bros DH3.Yeah but not buying a brand new 38mm fork because it doesn't have reverse compatibility or better yet a new hub standard? Geez.
Mad invite.The invitation is still open.
Fox doesn't officially support lowering the 40, but you can cut the air shaft down if you really want to go that route.
View attachment 143629
Which part? The 40 or the bike in general?How are you getting on with that set-up? Any drawbacks?
Which part? The 40 or the bike in general?
If you're talking about the fork, literally just weight, now that I fixed the offset.
Other things that weigh less than those old 36s:HAB's shortened 40 weighs less than my old style 36
180f/155r as I ride it most of the time. There's a flip chip for a longer stroke shock that makes it 175mm rear. I like it a whole lot for the winch and plummet type of riding I mostly do around here. The idea was to build the closest thing I could to a DH bike that still climbed pretty well (note: it is still not a replacement for an actual DH bike) and it's good at that. The more rolling and varied the terrain is, the less sense it makes. It's a big, long, slack bike that needs to be pointed pretty solidly downhill to really come alive and work.Sure; the whole bike. The fork is interesting, but the whole build looks rad too. You dig it?
What's the travel front and rear?
thanks
Thank god for those. Through axles with quick release levers give me the zikaebolaids.Because now they certainly want to replace those with aftermarket non-lever axles that “look clean”.
More than 3, I have an older 36 that is convertible and is currently 20mm.Has anyone been able to do that in the last 10 years? Maybe 3 people.
try me.You'd be surprised by the real test lab comparison testing done some big companies on 15mm vs 20mm axle designs.
They're not lighter . The first gen fox 15mm stuff was actually heavier because they used thicker wall bolts. And magnesium cast lower material weighs nothing in the different clamp sizes.But then when the product managers can save some weight
I have a wolftooth one on 2018 36. Lighter, much less unwieldy, much much better looking, basically elevates posing in a parking lot to another level.Anyone done with kabolt/ oneup axle upgrade on their 15qr? Noticeable upgrade?
I have the Wolftooth also on the same fork. I agree with all of the above.I have a wolftooth one on 2018 36. Lighter, much less unwieldy, much much better looking, basically elevates posing in a parking lot to another level.
Ok I'll admit that the 20mm is the go if it was/is available. But cmon - you're saying you'd not run the 38 over a much older fork just because it doesn't have that axle? Jeez.Let's see that test data. I need a reason to tell JM and toodles I'm right and they're wrong, so that I can then get back to dealing with their fanny packs.
That's exactly what I'm saying. Because this 38 is light. Which means they used thinner walled stanchions than they could have, and less material in the castings than they could have. Which means it's flexier than it could have been. You see that funky steerer tube? That's awesome. It's a weight penalty free design choice that will help negate the other stiffness compromises. The 20mm bolt would have been another one. A really significant one at that.Ok I'll admit that the 20mm is the go if it was/is available. But cmon - you're saying you'd not run the 38 over a much older fork just because it doesn't have that axle? Jeez.
Castings are the most expensive/committed component of a fork I would think. I can't think of any deviations between fox/marzocchi since they took over the name. Are any of the zoke ones unique?Kinda wonder if the 20mm axle option might make it onto the Marzocchi branded sidestream of product at some stage. Fox seems to be using that as their "go around" for reintroducing tech they claimed to have surpassed.
I'm pretty sure the Marz forks all use the same castings. Which is why I'm quite sure a 20mm Marz single crown isn't happening.Castings are the most expensive/committed component of a fork I would think. I can't think of any deviations between fox/marzocchi since they took over the name. Are any of the zoke ones unique?
Didn't they coil the Marz options? And cmon - they gotta cast 28 different fork varieties when basically 3 should do. Whats its gonna do - send them broke to do two more with a 20mm and pinchbolts? It'd only kill their marketing guy who told everyone that 15mm was the future. And given COVID they're probably trying to kill off a few employees anyway. Win - Win.Castings are the most expensive/committed component of a fork I would think. I can't think of any deviations between fox/marzocchi since they took over the name. Are any of the zoke ones unique?
Kind of what I was getting at.I'm pretty sure the Marz forks all use the same castings. Which is why I'm quite sure a 20mm Marz single crown isn't happening.
Let them fools you know 3 hours down the road from me that I needs 20mm axles for mah massive huxxors. Cuz MarzfuckinZochi!The Z1 lower is lighter than the current gen 36 lower (designed a few years later so more knowhow) That's why some suspension tuning people mix the grip 2 cart and a Z1 lower.
I've beaten the dead 20mm horse....nobody buys them anymore. If you buy that Zeb then you are also guilty of casting your vote!!!!!!Let them fools you know 3 hours down the road from me that I needs 20mm axles for mah massive huxxors. Cuz MarzfuckinZochi!