SkaredShtles said:Yup. We've got a machine at work that has 12 dual-core CPUs with 96GB of memory.......
WTF do you use it for?! and what kind of computer and OS?
SkaredShtles said:Yup. We've got a machine at work that has 12 dual-core CPUs with 96GB of memory.......
It runs a Sybase database. Actually, there are several individual Sybase dataservers running. It's a Sun 2900 running Solaris 8.BigMike said:WTF do you use it for?! and what kind of computer and OS?
SkaredShtles said:It runs a Sybase database. Actually, there are several individual Sybase dataservers running. It's a Sun 2900 running Solaris 8.
Yup. Still there:BigMike said:So what classifies a "supercomputer?" Do those even exist anymore? I remember when a teraflop was a big deal, now you can buy a home computer that can do 26+ Teraflops? are "supercomputers" just regular computers now?
of course, not all problems are suitable for such clusters... there are still uses for big iron.Transcend said:Supercoputers now are usually clusters of "nodes" seperate processing units. I think the university of virginia was tops for awhile with a mac sponsored cluster server. Can't remember what the university was.
That is true of course, big iron rules.Toshi said:of course, not all problems are suitable for such clusters... there are still uses for big iron.
supercomputers in the classic sense (vs. clusters)BigMike said:OK, enlighten me, again. Whats big iron?
Thats what I was talking about when I said supercomputer. So what kind of processing power does a thing like that have? 200 processors and 349875 gigs of ram?Toshi said:supercomputers in the classic sense (vs. clusters)
Actually i checked on crucial and 8 x 2gig of DDR2 ECC would cost you $8080... still less than 11k but far more than 1400.Transcend said:the funny part is apple wants 11k for 16gb of ecc ram (8 2gb sticks). You can get that for about $1400 from crucial.
well, not quite: two dual-core processors don't quite equate to four single core processors. but i wouldn't turn her down :heart:golgiaparatus said:Heh... too many pages to read here... 4 G5 processors? Thats one loud, wind sucking, power hungry M'fer right there. I have a G5 and its rediculous how many fans are in it. Its fast though, granted.
Here are specs from an IBM Big Blue:BigMike said:Thats what I was talking about when I said supercomputer. So what kind of processing power does a thing like that have? 200 processors and 349875 gigs of ram?
not quite what?Toshi said:well, not quite: two dual-core processors don't quite equate to four single core processors. but i wouldn't turn her down :heart:
Toshi said:not quite 4 G5s
if it was wouldn't the benchmarks all double? but they don't . i don't know technically why it's not as fast as two separate ones but it's true.BigMike said:Why not? Isnt a dual core processor equal to 2 singles?
Mostly because they multi-core systems will still share the same cache, northbridge, {rest of system and inherent bottlenecks} and so forth as the single core had dedicated to itself.Toshi said:if it was wouldn't the benchmarks all double? but they don't . i don't know technically why it's not as fast as two separate ones but it's true.
rigidhack said:Nice, but major overkill for anything I'd ever do. I'm still waiting for the new iMac I ordered a week ago. A 2 ghz G5 with 1g of RAM is enough.
Wonder if it will make Word run any faster?
You're not much of a nerd if you're asking if supercomputers still exist......BigMike said:THAAAAAAATS ME!
SkaredShtles said:You're not much of a nerd if you're asking if supercomputers still exist......