We're kicking off the 2024 Secret Santa! Exchange gifts with other monkeys - from beer and snacks, to bike gear, to custom machined holiday decorations and tools by our more talented members, there's something for everyone.
Those guys need some serious post processing, dwaugh
Hope you don't mind, but I liked the glint of light at the bottom of #3, added something to the picture for me, so I took a stab (just a quickie, only spent about a minute on it). Is this a little more like it looked?
I tried to give it a little unsharp mask but after it's saved into JPG the unsharp mask really brings out the JPG artifacts so I didn't keep it.
edit: all I did to it was a color correction to get rid of the blue color cast, darkened the highlights to give it a more even tone, and boosted the contrast a bit. Again, an unsharp mask really makes the texture and pattern on the flowers "pop" but that needs to be done on the original.
No, you don't have to do it to a RAW file, but you want to do it to a mostly-uncompressed file, since once you introduce the JPG artifacts into the image, the unsharp mask (and, in fact, any kind of sharpening) tends to sharpen the edges of the artifacts and it makes them stand out more.
My Sony won't do RAW. It'll do uncompressed TIFFs but it takes too long to write them.
I will have to think long and hard when I finally buy a dSLR as to whether I will shoot JPG or RAW. I love the idea of RAW but there are some disadvantages.
In Victorian England there was an enormous horticultural craze, especially for orchids. Women were not permitted to look at the flower as it was considered "overly erotic."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.