Someplace I have a photo with half a moustache, after being bitten in the face by a chainsaw...Things we need to see
Canadamos’ cake thief picture
Jim in a Porsche
JPB without a moustache
Kidwoo’s new bike ride report
Someplace I have a photo with half a moustache, after being bitten in the face by a chainsaw...
After that little bombshell....Someplace I have a photo with half a moustache, after being bitten in the face by a chainsaw...
Of course you do.Someplace I have a photo with half a moustache, after being bitten in the face by a chainsaw...
Can confirm.Riding one on singletrack just sounds terrible unless it's basically flat and smooth.
That bike you posted looks stiff, fuck that noise! I have a Soma Wolverine, all steel with a lugged, steel fork. It has 45mm tires and a mtb drivetrain. It has all the braze ons for panniers and bike touring, which is cool if I ever get a chance to go for a bike tour. Its a sweet ass swiss army knife bike.hmmmm interesting point Riding one on singletrack just sounds terrible unless it's basically flat and smooth.
Not so sure. I agree on the aero thing but also have the feeling the gravel/cross bike puts me in a better climbing position, especially for out of the saddle climbing. I would also say a gravel bike sit in between road and cross with the cross bike being closer to a MTB. I use my gravel bike (32 mm GP 4 Season slick tires) mainly for rural paved roads (read: not smooth) and gravel roads but when the loop includes trails I pick the cross bike (knobby tires).IME, the ONLY thing the gravel grinder bike gets you is less wind resistance due to aero riding position and skinny wheels-as long as you are actually riding gravel and not asphalt. On roads, the skinny tires let you go fast, but then, you should just have a road or cross bike anyway. .....
I did it once a day for 3 days straight. So yea, it was definitely fun.How was wolverine!?
The combination of POV, lens and bar surface in this pic is so perfect that the Spank logo looks like it was belatedly photoshopped in.
The combination of POV, lens and bar surface in this pic is so perfect that the Spank logo looks like it was belatedly photoshopped in.
I’m starting to wonder if there really is an Avalanche cart in that fork.
Now with 26" rear dh setup for easy lift day hot wheel on wheel swapping action.View attachment 132266
I switched a few years ago. I'm not sure if it makes a major difference in the number of rock strikes I get, but I feel better about it. It's also easier on my knees. No real downside. I guess technically there's a slight decrease in leverage, but I don't notice it.I am contemplating going to shorter cranks (165 from 175). I used to be able to get years from my pedals, but since switching to a longer/lower/slacker bike, I barely get a season out of them. Have any of youz guys made the switch to 165 cranks for mountain biking? Any downsides?
(I'm thinking of Shimano M8000. for the price and the weight, I can't find a better deal. And I think I prefer 4-bolt over cinch-style for the lack of creaking)
No downsides for me either, I have them on my trail bike.I am contemplating going to shorter cranks (165 from 175). I used to be able to get years from my pedals, but since switching to a longer/lower/slacker bike, I barely get a season out of them. Have any of youz guys made the switch to 165 cranks for mountain biking? Any downsides?
(I'm thinking of Shimano M8000. for the price and the weight, I can't find a better deal. And I think I prefer 4-bolt over cinch-style for the lack of creaking)
Yep, 170 M8000s here, too. Still get shedloads of pedal strikes, but I think that's more of a [lack of] skill thing.Not 165s, but I've been running 170s on my pedally bikes for a long time. Not so much for pedal strike reasons, more just because I like the smaller pedal circle. And those M8000 cranks are pretty unbeatable for the money, get those.
Yeah, I'm 6'.Are any of you on 170s for the trail bike 6' or taller?
I'm considering the switch also.