Operation Desert Shitstorm.It's butterscotch puddin color.
If I think about that, I like it.
Or just call it sandworm
Fair point...seeing 170mm travel popping up on a number of new bikes (Pivot Firebird, etc.) just sounds like a big bike after seeing so much innovation in the shorter travel realm lately. Plus I just like talking shit about Santa Cruz sometimes.It's practically identical geometry as the last one, just with a size shift. And 5mm more travel. It's not that different from the last one except where it matters.
I don't know why everyone saw a place for the last one but not this version. It's basically just a better working gen 3.
Maybe they'll update the Bronson as well?Sure the rear travel increased only 5mm and the frame is only .9lbs heavier but it also no longer has a 160 fork option, 170 only. The previous Nomad climbed well enough to be a genuine trail bike and 1 bike quiver for many riders. I think these three changes move the new Nomad into a different catagory. The fact that the last gen was advertised as an enduro weapon and this one as a freeride bike is telling.
Rock Sox sticker on a Shiver = kill list
Half a centimeter difference determines what kind of rider you are, clearlyIt's 5 millimeters.
The milli at the beginning means it's small.
Next, Santa Cruz will introduce a next gen URT and call it the U Mad.I think what @jonKranked is trying to say is: people complaining that adding 5 mil to travel while shortening chainstays and retaining head tube angle and making a steeper seat tube angle, while still maintaining a sub-30# build with an improved progression curve dramatically change whether they could possibly ever manage to ride a bike = KILL LIST
...And a lower link driven shock after RM giving Joe Grainey a giant raft of shit for his crayon drawn, upside down unrideabru backwards leverage thing, and now people continue to complain.
I can't keep up with these overly technical conversations. You got a layman's version?
A lot of the weight is in the shock, the metric shock with bearings in the eyelet weighs more, but feels good. the links got a little heavier too.Sure the rear travel increased only 5mm and the frame is only .9lbs heavier but it also no longer has a 160 fork option, 170 only. The previous Nomad climbed well enough to be a genuine trail bike and 1 bike quiver for many riders. I think these three changes move the new Nomad into a different catagory. The fact that the last gen was advertised as an enduro weapon and this one as a freeride bike is telling.
I am very excited about this bike! Superb job refining it to the team over at SC. It is a bit funny how similar it has become to the Capra - when compared to a Capra one size up (except the seat tube length), but then again that comparisment was only a lr correction away from being the other way around. I find that the bike looks great, has great geo and great kinematics. Good job indeed. Not to be too positive here or anything"explains why it is better".
I too was a little put off from all the reviews, they made the bike sound like it was no longer a viable trail bike and that it should relegated to shuttle runs and bike parks only. I'm definitely going to demo one before making up my mind, I love my N3 and it is my ONE bike to do it all. I'm glad Joe posted this really puts things into perspective. I'm not sure why all the reviewers are pigeon holing the bike, it's nice to hear that new Nomad is still a Nomad not the VP Free/Driver 8 replacement the media seems to think it is.A lot of the weight is in the shock, the metric shock with bearings in the eyelet weighs more, but feels good. the links got a little heavier too.
This bike climbs better than N3, I'd attribute a lot of it to the more support in mid-stroke so better pedaling position.
True that 170 fork is not a 160 fork, and you prob don't want to down from what its designed around. We stuck the headset in the tube so bar height wouldn't increase, but if you don't like more travel and same stack this might not be for you.
Last generation was released in 2014, and the spirit of #enduro was with bikes like this then, our racers chose it over Bronson to race on that year (except CG, who preferred Tallboy LT). Since then, all of our racers have all moved to 29 for pure speed. Doesn't mean we don't think this is a fun bike though, its fast as fuck - kind of ridiculous fun really. If your trails are smooth, it'll probably make them feel boring and this could be too much bike. If you have moar rox its amazing.
We don't imply its a freeride bike, but most of the media reports so far kind of lean that way because we brought them shuttling for 3 days in Provence area and in Molini, and didn't do a lot of pedaling, so thats the experience many journos got. There were no skinnies, hucks to flat, or train gaps tho.
I think there are at least a few truths in MTB. A long travel bike is always going to be more of a chore to ride uphill and on the flats than a lesser one, weighing more, suspension absorbing more inputs and weight shifts (despite any marketing BS), and so on. My RFX pedals wonderful for a 160 AM machine, but anyone who thinks it pedals as well as my 100mm Mach 429SL is on crack, that bike just feels like a rocket comparatively. A lot of us convince ourselves we need a lot more bike than we do, and to a point I think over-biking is good when you want to retain that capability to hit the park a few days and make the most out of the fun downhills, but it's still a balance and going too far in one direction can push you over the top and leave you with something that is just a dog everywhere and all the time or doesn't have enough travel/strength for those park days.I too was a little put off from all the reviews, they made the bike sound like it was no longer a viable trail bike and that it should relegated to shuttle runs and bike parks only. I'm definitely going to demo one before making up my mind, I love my N3 and it is my ONE bike to do it all. I'm glad Joe posted this really puts things into perspective. I'm not sure why all the reviewers are pigeon holing the bike, it's nice to hear that new Nomad is still a Nomad not the VP Free/Driver 8 replacement the media seems to think it is.
If the last one was the "Miami vice", then this one is....I like the tan
In all fairness, I think the intentions of the Nomad have shifted over the years, in large part due to the success of the Bronson. When I had the original carbon Nomad, it was marketed as their all mountain bike, but was very trail bike-y in practice (didn't play well with coil shocks, LOTS of anti-squat with weird axle path, etc.). With the Nomad 3, SC pushed the envelope a bit and somewhat redefined what we are now calling the enduro bike. Now, they're introducing a version that plays nicely with coil shocks, has a bit more travel, is quite slack, and is by most accounts even burlier than any prior Nomad. All without moving the Bronson anywhere.I too was a little put off from all the reviews, they made the bike sound like it was no longer a viable trail bike and that it should relegated to shuttle runs and bike parks only. I'm definitely going to demo one before making up my mind, I love my N3 and it is my ONE bike to do it all. I'm glad Joe posted this really puts things into perspective. I'm not sure why all the reviewers are pigeon holing the bike, it's nice to hear that new Nomad is still a Nomad not the VP Free/Driver 8 replacement the media seems to think it is.
I passed this on to the guys at the shop (Avalanche Sports) and they're happy to hear that it'll climb as well as the N3. Rich says when the demo bikes we ordered show up we'll have a "team building" day on them at Keystone. I think we should follow that with an up-and-down of Lenawee Trail to test the climbing abilities.A lot of the weight is in the shock, the metric shock with bearings in the eyelet weighs more, but feels good. the links got a little heavier too.
This bike climbs better than N3, I'd attribute a lot of it to the more support in mid-stroke so better pedaling position.
True that 170 fork is not a 160 fork, and you prob don't want to down from what its designed around. We stuck the headset in the tube so bar height wouldn't increase, but if you don't like more travel and same stack this might not be for you.
Last generation was released in 2014, and the spirit of #enduro was with bikes like this then, our racers chose it over Bronson to race on that year (except CG, who preferred Tallboy LT). Since then, all of our racers have all moved to 29 for pure speed. Doesn't mean we don't think this is a fun bike though, its fast as fuck - kind of ridiculous fun really. If your trails are smooth, it'll probably make them feel boring and this could be too much bike. If you have moar rox its amazing.
We don't imply its a freeride bike, but most of the media reports so far kind of lean that way because we brought them shuttling for 3 days in Provence area and in Molini, and didn't do a lot of pedaling, so thats the experience many journos got. There were no skinnies, hucks to flat, or train gaps tho.
Up Lenawee? ... ugh. Ill meet you for half that ride.up-and-down of Lenawee Trail
You need to get off mtbrHas anyone heard when the nomad will be updated?
For someone who's never thrown a leg over a Santa Cruz, how does it compare to your Patrol? More of a Reign type plow bike?Me likey this bikey.
Dentist's tune? Something that probably works really well for someone who doesn't ride it very hard?I still would like to corner someone at sc and ask them why in the world they made/make their trail bikes like that. I know I'd never get a straight answer though.
It's more similar to the patrol with the updated link than it is the previous nomad. The leverage ratio at the top of the travel of the new nomad keeps it kind of loose like I said. But it's where it should be, at the top and moving through sag, just not surrounding the sag point. And you don't get the wheel hanging up when it catches something on the ground as the travel extends like the old nomad.For someone who's never thrown a leg over a Santa Cruz, how does it compare to your Patrol? More of a Reign type plow bike?
As implemented on the new Nomad, nope.So VPP doesn't suck now? I really struggle to keep up with this forum.