I'm not convinced that Brady is better. He's having an awesome year, an amazing year, looks like the best single year ever, statistically. But I'm not ready to crown him as better than Peyton just yet.
NFL : Pats vs Giants
- Thread starter LordOpie
- Start date
I've seen idiots in Steelers jackets all over the country. And every time, it's the loudest and most intoxicated jackass in the room.
I disagree, as of now. Someday I might look back and say Brady was better, but right now I have not seen proof. He's having one awesome year, nothing else.
And if someone offered me millions of dollars to make too many TV commercials, I'd be all over that sh!t, and so would you
Andy Reid should be more of a douchebag. Especially to his sons.
Belichick plays every game to win. Starters will play thruout
The Giants need(and will) rest some players.
The Giants need(and will) rest some players.
mike shanahan is the biggest douche coach in the league now that cowher's gone.
look at the records, and the supporting cast.
brady in a landslide. hell, if he had James or Addai in the backfield for the last 3 years, and could throw to Harrison or Wayne for the same time, the pats would never lose.
I think Jacksonville will beat the Pats
Actually, I wholeheartedly agree.
rob turns into a cinder.
The difference is no other team is run by asshats to the extent of the Pats. Yeah, lets go for it on 4th and goal just to run up the score.
Too bad the yellow flags can't come out for poor sportsmanship like that.
Maybe I missed something along the way, but isn't the whole point to beat the other team? If you have the ability to ensure a win beyond a doubt how is that unsportsmanlike? Should the Pats (or any other team) stop playing to the best of their abilities just because they're winning? I say no, if the other team can't keep up they deserve to get thoroughly whipped. It's not like we're talking an NFL franchise against a Pop Warner team, these are all professional athletes who are being paid to play as hard as they can. Quit your whining.
You're a pvssy
the f in nfl stands for football, not vagina as you seem to think.
agreed.
NOT running up the score as much as possible is tantamount to not playing your starters.
So you're suggesting it was unsportsmanlike for Westbrook to slide down at the 1 instead of running up the score against their biggest rivals, the Cowboys?
See above, and I call bullsh!t.
He did that so the clock would expire. It had nothing to do with points.
he wasn't doing that to Not run up the score , he did that to garuentee a win and make sure the cowboys didn't get the ball back.
Sometimes I think Rob is an idiot.
Rob, stop letting your blind hatred, umm, blind you.
Stop bandwagon jumping Opie.
The Pats are douchebags, and that won't change. Belichek is an unwashed cvnt, and that won't change. Superbowls, perfect seasons, nothing will change the fact that the Pats are a swaggering, arrogant bunch of pricks.
End of discussion. I hope Brady suffers a Bledsoe against the Giants. I'll be watching.
Correct. The Pats just suck more. ANY team sucks with Madden swinging from the QBs nutsack.
Think about it logically...
-- you're a billion dollar organization, there's no "fair" play except that set by the Federal Govt. You do your best, every second.
-- this is NFL history in the making. Frankly, I want it as much for the Pats as I do to put down the dying dog that is my '72 Dolphins. If my father was alive, he'd be embarrassed for the team he saw do the amazing by they way they're acting today.
-- 19-0 is so much more amazing than 18-1, so why not go for it?
dude, go get a drink, smoke a bowl, switch to decaf, rub one out and try to enjoy the experience.
I'm not suggesting that at all. He made what I'm sure was a difficult personal sacrifice by not scoring in order to ensure a win. Making the td would have given possession of the ball to Dallas and taken control of the game away from the Eagles. They had the points to win and his play all but locked the win for them, a very smart move IMO.
God do I hope the Pats go 19-0. 
I want it more and more everytime someone gets a sandy vagina about the subject.God do I hope the Pats go 19-0.
If no one was complaining, I might not care.
I'm a Giants fan, but if Beth video'd Rob's brain exploding after the Pat's win...God do I hope the Pats go 19-0.
Maybe we (Giants fans) will get lucky and the Pats bus will crash on the way to Jersey. I dont really hate the Pats...it just that I wish that fat bastard coach of theirs would die!
I'd be a lot more impressed if 3 teams went unbeaten in the AFC and the Pats didn't get a buy week. 20-0?
only problem with that is the Pats played all 3 of the other division winners and beat them all.
I'm talking about next year.
Is it possible for any 3 teams in the same conference to never play each other?
Is it possible for any 3 teams in the same conference to never play each other?
16 teams in a conference, 16 games in a season.
6 games against division opponents.
4 games against an NFC division
4 games against an AFC division
2 games against others.
Figuring out if three teams could avoid each other would involve math and logic that is beyond my comprehension. Where's BV? He'd know.
that will be really unlikely with the way the league makes the schedule based on the strength of the team the previous year.
edit: actually reading IAB's post ,it would not be possible to have 3 16-0 teams in the same conference , 2 yes , 3 no.
Yes, it could happen.
Party pooper.
People said it was impossible to go undefeated in the modern era. We will see on Saturday.
no it can't
let's say the win all the games in there confrence , and all the games vs the NFc, and the 2 random ones , now let say you have the east Vs. South and the North Vs west.
you can only get 2 teams wich would be one from the east/south and one from the north/west .
Example
Indy runs their division and all their NFC games. They play the Browns, Dolphins, Raiders, Denver, Jets, and Bills with their 4 AFC +2 other.
Patriots run division and NFC games. They beat the Bengals, Browns, Chargers, Texans, Chiefs and Titans for their 4+2.
Steelers run division and NFC. Beat Dolphins, Bills, Raiders, Denver, Texans and Jaguars for their 4+2.
3 16-0 teams in the regular season. Tie breaker rules forces one team to play an extra round in the playoffs giving them the chance to go 20-0.
How does that not follow the rules IRB posted?
Indy runs their division and all their NFC games. They play the Browns, Dolphins, Raiders, Denver, Jets, and Bills with their 4 AFC +2 other.
Patriots run division and NFC games. They beat the Bengals, Browns, Chargers, Texans, Chiefs and Titans for their 4+2.
Steelers run division and NFC. Beat Dolphins, Bills, Raiders, Denver, Texans and Jaguars for their 4+2.
3 16-0 teams in the regular season. Tie breaker rules forces one team to play an extra round in the playoffs giving them the chance to go 20-0.
How does that not follow the rules IRB posted?
Westy, each team plays an entire division in each conference (plus their own division), plus two floater games that depend on previous year's standing and such. None of your examples have a team playing an entire division within their conference.
Gotcha.
Now a team could tie several games in a year, never lose and still be a 3 seed. An undefeated 20 game season is still possible
