Quantcast

OMFG! More bad news....

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
...for the Dim's mid-term election year chances.

:p

Jobless Claims Plunge to Five-Year Low
AP | Jan 05 | MARTIN CRUTSINGER

WASHINGTON-The number of newly laid-off workers filing claims for unemployment benefits fell to the lowest level in more than five years last week, providing strong evidence that the labor market is shaking off the effects of a string of devastating hurricanes.

The Labor Department reported Thursday that applications for unemployment benefits dropped by 35,000 to 291,000, the smallest number since Sept. 23, 2000, when the economy was in the concluding months of the longest economic expansion in history.

The decline of 35,000 claims was much better than Wall Street had been expecting and bolstered the belief that the labor market is on the mend after a rough period in the fall when Gulf Coast hurricanes caused the loss of more than 600,000 jobs over a period of four months.

The total for weekly jobless claims was far below the peak of 435,000 set the week ending Sept. 17, a period when the number of job losses attributed to Hurricane Katrina totaled 108,000.

The government stopped tracking the impact of Katrina, Rita and Wilma last week because the weekly increase in storm-related layoffs had dwindled to slightly more than 1,000. But for the four months that the storms were tracked, the combined number of layoffs blamed on the hurricanes totaled more than 600,000.

The better-than-expected improvement in the layoff picture for last week was certain to raise hopes for a solid performance in job growth for December.

Analysts are predicting that the economy probably created 200,000 new jobs last month, with the unemployment rate probably holding steady at 5 percent. That would follow 215,000 new jobs in November after two months in which job growth had stalled because of the onslaught of massive layoffs in Gulf Coast states.

Economists are predicting that 2006 will represent another year of steady growth in jobs of around 175,000 per month. That reflects their belief that the economy will keep growing at a solid pace this year as business spending to expand and modernize production facilities offsets expected slower growth in housing sales and overall consumer spending.

The Federal Reserve has raised interest rates 13 consecutive times and is expected to boost rates again at Alan Greenspan's last meeting on Jan. 31 to make sure that inflation remains in check. But the Dow Jones industrial average shot up by 130 points on Tuesday following release of Fed minutes of the December meeting that suggested the rate hikes are drawing to a close.
 

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.
Like that has anything to do with Bush.... :rolleyes:

All it means is that you should force Greenspan to keep working.
Who, by the way is a "pub", so don't say I hate all "pubs"
 

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.
Oh... and if memory serves my correct, 5 years ago BUSH was also in office... So unemployment is the lowest it has been while Bush has been in office.
Big Whoop!
 

Damn True

Monkey Pimp
Sep 10, 2001
4,015
3
Between a rock and a hard place.
-BB- said:
Like that has anything to do with Bush.... :rolleyes:

All it means is that you should force Greenspan to keep working.
Who, by the way is a "pub", so don't say I hate all "pubs"
The jobless rate had everything to do with the leadership of the POTUS in 1995. Why is there no longer a connection?
 

Changleen

Paranoid Member
Jan 9, 2004
14,914
2,879
Pōneke
There probably is. GW loves big business after all.

What is more likely to stir the public's feelings (I hope) is when the fact that most of the poorest neighbourhoods in NO have STILL not even been touched, let alone started to be cleaned up, after GW promised 'the biggest clean up in history'.

4 months and nothing has been done? That is uber-lame.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
...the smallest number since Sept. 23, 2000, when the economy was in the concluding months of the longest economic expansion in history.
Interesting. I appears that the "economic expansion" ended when Bush took office? Huh. I guess he inspired such confidence.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
-BB- said:
Like that has anything to do with Bush.... :rolleyes:
Sure it does. Unemployment is STILL at a high. This is the rate of new unemployments. Eventually, if enough people get laid off the labor market stabilizes, which it is appearing to do... at a nice high unemployment rate.

Really what we need to see is the above number against new job creations. And if you really want to get fancy, you compare the salaries of jobs lost vs. those created.
 

Ciaran

Fear my banana
Apr 5, 2004
9,841
19
So Cal
N8 said:
So.. this good news is really bad news...?
Don't make me put you back on ignore. Think N8, THINK!!!!! For the love of all that is good and right in this world and any other worlds... THINK!!!!!
 

reflux

Turbo Monkey
Mar 18, 2002
4,617
2
G14 Classified
Ciaran said:
Don't make me put you back on ignore. Think N8, THINK!!!!! For the love of all that is good and right in this world and any other worlds... THINK!!!!!
For those who have watched South Park:

"Okay Sparky. Sit. Lay Down. Speak. Okay Sparky, now...don't be gay!"

You're fighting a lost cause Mike.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
ohio said:
And if you really want to get fancy, you compare the salaries of jobs lost vs. those created.
I've always had issues with "unemployment" stats. Underemployment isn't represented and what about those disenfranchised who have stopped looking and can't claim unemployment anymore.

Govt stats are phucked up.

Of course, N8 doesn't understand economics, but he sure likes puking out articles claiming Bush is some genius.
 

Reactor

Turbo Monkey
Apr 5, 2005
3,976
1
Chandler, AZ, USA
So the title should be "Economy least F'ed than at any other time in the Bush Presidency"

Actually I have grave concerns with the Government stats, similar to those of LordOpie. The stats are terribly short sighted, and don't show long term problems like the chronically underemployed, or people who can't find a job at all.