Quantcast

OpEd: A [Bush] BLOWOUT IN THE MAKING

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
A BLOWOUT IN THE MAKING
NYPost.com | 24 Mar | Dick Morris

March 24, 2004 -- THE Bush ads are working: Two weeks ago, the Washington Post poll showed Sen. John Kerry ahead of President Bush by 11 points, and the Gallup Poll had him up by 8, while more recent polls reflect a dead heat between the two.
Zogby (March 21) has Kerry up by only 48-46, and Rasmussen (March 20) has it Bush 46, Kerry 45.

Interestingly, the new surveys don't show Bush gain ing so much as they show Kerry dropping. In the odd configurations of political strategy, that is good news for the Republicans.

If Bush were simply gaining because of good news or a bump from the recent focus on terrorism, he could go down as easily as he went up. Let the news turn bad, and Bush would go back to the low ratings of a few weeks ago.

But with the gap closing because of Kerry's drop, the impact is likely to last a lot longer. The fact is that 6 to 9 percent of Americans were voting for the Democrat two weeks ago and now are undecided. The doubts that Bush's ads are raising about Kerry are not going to go away; they will grow as the ads continue and the facts pile up.

The polls are starting to reflect the effectiveness of Bush's ads, which depict Kerry explaining his ultra-liberal record to the voters. This Democrat, who escaped scrutiny by posing as the un-Dean in the primary, is now being revealed as the leftist he is.

Having defeated the three candidates of his party who might have beaten Bush - Wesley Clark, Joe Lieberman and John Edwards - Kerry is finding out that America is a centrist nation.

I have doubted the conventional wisdom that this election would be close. If Bush continues to stay on the offensive and Kerry's responses remain as inept as they've been, the Massachusetts Democrat will go downhill faster than he is now doing on his skiing vacation.

Bush's attacks have focused on the issues of terrorism and taxes. Kerry has not even answered the first charge and has given only a ritualistic denial of the second. Instead of answering Bush's charges in detail, he piously asks, in his ads, if the president has anything more to offer America than negative ads. But Americans don't see the Bush ads as below the belt, but as welcome information about a man they don't know who is running for president.

Indeed, the latest New York Times/CBS survey indicates that 60 percent of the voters feel Kerry is telling them what they want to hear, not what he really believes. Bush is opening a credibility gap which is only widened by Kerry's ridiculous statement that he voted for the $87 billion appropriation for the war effort before he voted against it.

In the next round of attack ads, Bush should focus on Kerry's previous support for a 50 cent increase in the gasoline tax. Remember, it was the gas tax, more than any other issue, that cost the Democrats control of Congress in 1994. With pump prices closing in on $2 a gallon, Americans will not look kindly on someone who proposes to add another half-dollar per gallon.

Kerry's two gaffes - on foreign leaders with whom he allegedly spoke and on his flip-flop on the money for the war - were not unforced errors: They were fumbles caused by the aggressive pressure of the Bush campaign.

This Democrat is not ready to run for president, and the more the Republicans press him, the more he will self-destruct. His campaign advisers are hoping that a few hours extra sleep on his ski trip will restore his political judgment, but they ignore the fact that he never had a lot to begin with.

The fact is that Massachusetts liberal Democrats don't spend a lot of time learning how to appeal to middle America.

Kerry only won the nomination because Dean lost it and Edwards was hobbled by Clark so he could not get the momentum he needed to mount a real challenge. With the front-loaded process, decreed by financial-wizard-but-political-amateur Terry McAuliffe, the party is united but saddled with a nominee who can't handle prime time.

Bush needs to keep up the pressure and watch Kerry's ratings drop. In a few months, we may be wondering why the conventional wisdom ever thought this race would be so close.
 

RhinofromWA

Brevity R Us
Aug 16, 2001
4,622
0
Lynnwood, WA
Any one notice that both Bush and Kerry are finishing their add campaigns with the "I'm _________, and I approve this messege."

:confused:

I never noticed it in past elections. Now both of them are doing it. Must have cronies that went to the same school of production, or something.

Is that the appropiate way to end poli-ads now?

R
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
Originally posted by RhinofromWA
Any one notice that both Bush and Kerry are finishing their add campaigns with the "I'm _________, and I approve this messege."

:confused:

I never noticed it in past elections. Now both of them are doing it. Must have cronies that went to the same school of production, or something.

Is that the appropiate way to end poli-ads now?

R
You can thank the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Law for that.
 

golgiaparatus

Out of my element
Aug 30, 2002
7,340
41
Deep in the Jungles of Oklahoma
Originally posted by RhinofromWA
Any one notice that both Bush and Kerry are finishing their add campaigns with the "I'm _________, and I approve this messege."

:confused:

I never noticed it in past elections. Now both of them are doing it. Must have cronies that went to the same school of production, or something.

Is that the appropiate way to end poli-ads now?

R
Yeah, its like... some copy writer writes something and they approves it... its like a marketing campaign now more than it is a personal thing... which product shall we choose :monkey:
 

ummbikes

Don't mess with the Santas
Apr 16, 2002
1,794
0
Napavine, Warshington
Originally posted by N8
You can thank the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Law for that.
Did you read that law N8? Do you even know what it does or doesn't do?


So tell me exactly which part of the law should be thanked N8.
 

RhinofromWA

Brevity R Us
Aug 16, 2001
4,622
0
Lynnwood, WA
Originally posted by ummbikes
Did you read that law N8? Do you even know what it does or doesn't do?


So tell me exactly which part of the law should be thanked N8.
I didn't but I assumed it had something to do with blatently saying who the add came from......Campaign finance reform stuff.

R
 

ummbikes

Don't mess with the Santas
Apr 16, 2002
1,794
0
Napavine, Warshington
Originally posted by RhinofromWA
I didn't but I assumed it had something to do with blatently saying who the add came from......Campaign finance reform stuff.

R
It's a pretty good read Rhino. It has been called everything from a violation of the first ammendment to the best legislation ever enacted.

The simple story is that it was a mighty lion of leglislation that was taken to the vet, nuetered, declawed and had it's teeth removed.

It didn't really change much.