I have no fear of them and I'm definitely not a Jesus freak...
I simply don't like abnormal behavior and I love women !!!
What's wrong with that?
I simply don't like abnormal behavior and I love women !!!
What's wrong with that?
Opposed to the gay marriage amendment?
- Thread starter Capt. Jack Sparrow
- Start date
The fact that I think homosexual behavior is abnormal? I'm sure that most people think the same way. That's not p.c. these days.
Like I said before, for one reason or another, there has always been, and will be, people that aren't attracted to the opposite sex, that's abnormal behavior, but it does exist.
I don't like men, I like women. I believe in "opposites attract". And I believe that's the way 98% of the human race operate. What's wrong with that?
Let's play devil's advocate. Everyone is gay or lesbian. No procreation. No babies. No creation of the next generation. No more human beings.
Weee....let's get married!!!
Like I said before, for one reason or another, there has always been, and will be, people that aren't attracted to the opposite sex, that's abnormal behavior, but it does exist.
I don't like men, I like women. I believe in "opposites attract". And I believe that's the way 98% of the human race operate. What's wrong with that?
Let's play devil's advocate. Everyone is gay or lesbian. No procreation. No babies. No creation of the next generation. No more human beings.
Weee....let's get married!!!
It's normal for gay people.
Having sex for enjoyment and having sex for babies are not the same thing.
I find this part of the argument interesting.Originally posted by Jr_Bullit
Now that's definitely silly....There's tons of male/female marriages that occur when one or the other cannot reproduce for genetic/physical reasons....and there's more that simply don't want kids, or just want to adopt. So this to me is not a valid reason why it must be one man and one woman. If I can't reproduce and they can prove it at the time of my marriage this means I can't marry?
Following that logic....
If a lesbian has artificial insemenation and gets pregnant she can't call herself gay. Since haveing a child is the result of a male/female union (not legal union) so any lesbian women who have a child cannot call themselfs gay. If they were gay they wouldn't have a child. Does that mean Gays shouldn't be alowed to adopt or have children? No. But it the same reasoning you gave for stopping the marriage of an infertile couple.
Seems the issue is the changing of the definition of marriage.....
And gay couples marrying is a change in the definition of marriage. If it wasn't we wouldn't be talking about this.
I still say they can have a civil union (but call it something else 'cause that name has a negative conotation to it) with all rights of marriage....because it IS a different event. Doesn't mean they shouldn't do it....I think they should. I do think it is not a "marriage" but something equal in stature.
Things can be equal but different....look at positive action.
abnormal as in not the norm.......
yeah I would say homosexuals are not the norm.
Hell I am not the norm.
laughable: who has sex just to make babies.
artificial insemination is done with a syringe. - you call that sex?
What about some one who is gay, either latent or in the closet, reproduces, then comes out of the closet? That's one way that gay folks have kids that everyone here is leaving out: the third way that gays have kids. This is what both my parents did.
everyone has an opinion, how many of you are gay, have gay family members, some experience to actually draw on?
geargrrl
artificial insemination is done with a syringe. - you call that sex?
What about some one who is gay, either latent or in the closet, reproduces, then comes out of the closet? That's one way that gay folks have kids that everyone here is leaving out: the third way that gays have kids. This is what both my parents did.
everyone has an opinion, how many of you are gay, have gay family members, some experience to actually draw on?
geargrrl
Dude, thats more of that specious reasoning.
If infertile people could not marry it would not follow that people who have children by AI could not be gay. Not a logical thing.
don't you get it? if you have an opposing point of view, it's because you're a latent homosexual afraid of who you really are?
while we're being devil's advocate, go another extreme: abolish marriage. Does anyone here think this will be good for kids/family? You're being intellectually dishonest if you refuse to recognise the sine qua non.
and quit using logic, you're starting to piss people off!
you know what I'm talkin' about when it comes to sex.
Yea, my GF and I don't boink just to have kids.
But, if we really wanted to try and start a family and have kids, a house on the prairie, and all that stuff...we'd get married.
Yea, my GF and I don't boink just to have kids.
But, if we really wanted to try and start a family and have kids, a house on the prairie, and all that stuff...we'd get married.
Man... I hope we can get that Fukr out of the whitehouse
Who's that aimed at? $tinkle's not flaming you...
OMG. You are a sinner!!! Living in a glass house no doubt.
You must be going to some left wing college, because you sure are indoctrinated.
I assure you...speaking as an adult male for myself...the only thing that turns me on is a hot babe.
I think you are the latent homosexual.
I think they should abolish divorce. Everyone always forgets the "till death do us part".Then we wouldn't have all these stupid divorces going on.
Sorry...I don't know latin..."wha'cha talkin' 'bout Willis ???"
Logic rules...just ask any scientist.
I assure you...speaking as an adult male for myself...the only thing that turns me on is a hot babe.
I think you are the latent homosexual.
I think they should abolish divorce. Everyone always forgets the "till death do us part".Then we wouldn't have all these stupid divorces going on.
Sorry...I don't know latin..."wha'cha talkin' 'bout Willis ???"
Logic rules...just ask any scientist.
I go for a job interview, I'm gone two hours, and y'all drop the ball. I'm very disappointed in you people.Originally posted by RhinofromWA
abnormal as in not the norm.......
yeah I would say homosexuals are not the norm.
Hell I am not the norm.
(therefore I'm a homosexual)
Rhino just came out of the closet!
I wrote that above to blast the reasoning that getting married is just for having kids. Probably didn't come across right.
People say gays can marry 'cause hetero's get married with no ability or intention of having kids. When since the dawn of time Marriage has been the union of a man and a woman. That is the essence of the definition and the problemit seams.
People have kids through hetero sexual contact. It doesn't happen any other way (except for Mary
) Having a kid through any means, she (she because she carries the child) has perpetrated the heterosexual act of procreating. Didn't say it was wrong but having kids is an heterosexual act. That is like saying two consenting same sex adults are able to fit the same mold as hetero marraige. A gay person canhave a child, but the essence is a heterosexual act.Having kids doesn't make them hetero and getting hitched (some sort of union) doesn't fit them into same definition as Marriage. Though I see no reason not to afford them the same rights and previliages
rolleyes: ) as any other legally teathered coupleThat probably wasn't any clearer.
Did I ever tell you my thoery on the perception I've had since I was in grade school?
That will really confuse you.
I am sooooo abnormal.
Hey LO, I got something waiting for ya... ahhhh
: lol
BTW- How did the interview go?
you are the first to accuse me of either being educated or indoctrinated by the left.
pretend i'm being sarcastic in my response post to yours. It will be clearer that we see this issue more parallel than others here. Or, just read from the beginning of the thread - the choice is yours.
all things in moderation, my friend.
A little wider, ok, good.Originally posted by RhinofromWA
Hey LO, I got something waiting for ya... ahhhh
thanks man, yesterday's went well *fingers crossed* today's didn't cuz they have no benefits and don't want to pay anywhere near what I'm worth... and I ain't worth that muchOriginally posted by RhinofromWA
BTW- How did the interview go?
No it does not. By now you should be well aware of my campagne to keep corporate accountants out of the wedding chappels. I just see no reason to afford them the same rights and priveleges as normal people. I mean... accountants are screwy, all obsessed with making things add up (blister in the sun style) when it is nearly proven that nothing in the universe will ever add up to a neat black and white solution....Originally posted by RhinofromWA
Having kids doesn't make them hetero and getting hitched (some sort of union) doesn't fit them into same definition as Marriage. Though I see no reason to afford them the same rights and previliages
OK what are you arguing? Duh, it is on a genetic level. Just because we have scientific means doesn't mean the essence of the event is a heterosexual act. I didn't say it was wrong I said it was the result of a hetero act. Never said AI was wrong...now you are jumping to conclusions. So your guess would be wrong.
In any case I did a poor job of laying out my sarcasm in multiple posts above.
But I did get everyone positn again this morning.
Accountants are wierd people. They should not me allowed to marry. They think all them people walking around in a purple haze have lost their marbles....not EVERYTHING is grey.
It is the act of making things grey that keeps the pol-deb forum alive!
Oh SH!T!!!!!!!
Big appologies everyone....
Let me requote myself and fix a big speling error!
:
My appologies.
Rhino
Big appologies everyone....
Let me requote myself and fix a big speling error!
:Leaving that out (oye!) contradicted what I wanted to say in the first place. Thanks SM. I never would have went back if you hadn't quoted it. YIKES!
My appologies.
Rhino
OK. You can get married now...
Sweet! Even if I wanna merry you? *blows kisses*(that was for LO)Originally posted by Serial Midget
OK. You can get married now...
I really need to watch them double negatives....especially when I type so well and proof read all that I type.
: