dear lord, spomer and I want the same outcome. :dancing:©2001 said:maybe an eruption will blow up all the dumb stunts (how's that for politics).
dear lord, spomer and I want the same outcome. :dancing:©2001 said:maybe an eruption will blow up all the dumb stunts (how's that for politics).
man reminds me of Tears For Fears for some reason....xy9ine said:indeed! propigating mass hysteria is fun, though.
SEATTLE WILL BE ENGULFED BY FIERY RIVERS OF HOT MAG-MA!!1!!1!
that's called "the lounge". also note that the forum where pac nw monkies tend to be found is called "pacific nw"Damn True said:Because we don't have an "increased seismic activity" forum?
I went to the Lounge once, but everyone was crippling wit respect.Toshi said:that's called "the lounge". also note that the forum where pac nw monkies tend to be found is called "pacific nw"
ink:
Transcend said:Seattle would be buried under hundreds of feet of mud, making the region almost inhabitable.1. That is where I got the extremely random quote from.
2. Do you have any idea how much material 20' to 40' of material would be over the Seattle Metropolitan area. Yea, there very well could be a location that would have over 100 feet of material on it, but to say the Seattle area just isn't feasible.
Point in case:
Approximately 40 miles of land (Lynwood to Tacoma) at approximately 13 mile wide (width of I-5 corridor) would be 520 square miles or 14.5 billion square feet. So you take 20' (low estimate) of material and you come up with 290 billion cubic feet of material.
Now, assuming that Mt. Rainer did erupt and that the entire mountain went into the air and was deposited onto the above stated area we could conclude the following: Mt. Rainer has 35 square miles of snow/ice covered cap (National Park Info) or approximately 1 billion square feet. Assuming a perfect pyramid (larger than a cone), in order to produce the 290 cubic feet the top 891 feet would have to be blown away.
You could do the math a thousand different ways, but there still isn't enough material in there to even get close to the 20' feet of cover.
My point was that to make statements that are a false representation of the actual facts is wrong.
Thats weird, they just came on my radio right as I read it....Curiouscaptian01 said:man reminds me of Tears For Fears for some reason....
No tude. I was just trying to make a point about too much of anything, even if biologically beneficial at certain quantities, can reach toxic levels. Like straight oxygen to you and me, too much CO2 to trees, and your completely unfounded hatred towards single pivots since you got a job at fsr world. That and the fact that I really wanted to brag about the fact that I work with two of the guys who have been studying mammoth and the long valley caldera for the last dozen or so years. They're smart and accomplished and I just wanted to ride their tails for the sake of this thread and since dingus brought it up. No hatred towards you, I promise. Watch this:Damn True said:a) what's with the 'tude lately? My statement was hardly unreasonable.
b) interesting, I didn't know the following:
Although leaves of plants produce oxygen (O2) from CO2 during photosynthesis, their roots need to absorb O2 directly. The high CO2 concentrations in the soil on Mammoth Mountain are killing trees by denying their roots O2 and by interfering with nutrient uptake. In the areas of tree kill, CO2 makes up about 20 to 95% of the gas content of the soil; soil gas normally contains 1% or less CO2.
c) Ive spent quite a bit of time on Aviators O2 with no ill effects with no ill effect with no ill effects with no ill effects with no ill effects
BSN_mt said:Transcend said:Seattle would be buried under hundreds of feet of mud, making the region almost inhabitable.1. That is where I got the extremely random quote from.
2. Do you have any idea how much material 20' to 40' of material would be over the Seattle Metropolitan area. Yea, there very well could be a location that would have over 100 feet of material on it, but to say the Seattle area just isn't feasible.
Point in case:
Approximately 40 miles of land (Lynwood to Tacoma) at approximately 13 mile wide (width of I-5 corridor) would be 520 square miles or 14.5 billion square feet. So you take 20' (low estimate) of material and you come up with 290 billion cubic feet of material.
Now, assuming that Mt. Rainer did erupt and that the entire mountain went into the air and was deposited onto the above stated area we could conclude the following: Mt. Rainer has 35 square miles of snow/ice covered cap (National Park Info) or approximately 1 billion square feet. Assuming a perfect pyramid (larger than a cone), in order to produce the 290 cubic feet the top 891 feet would have to be blown away.
You could do the math a thousand different ways, but there still isn't enough material in there to even get close to the 20' feet of cover.
My point was that to make statements that are a false representation of the actual facts is wrong.
Well math or no math, it would still be a lot of stuff.
:eviltongu
My family and I drove from San Jose to Seattle in '80. The land was gray (ash covered) from waaaaaaaaaaay south of Portland clear past Tacoma.Tully said:I heard it should only affect those within a five-mile range, but that is obviously pretty hard to call.
yeah, and lets not forget the volcanic barf that comes with pooping the top offDamn True said:Well math or no math, it would still be a lot of stuff.
:eviltongu
When st helens blew, there was major ash deposits (inches+) falling as far away as colorado and montana. These guys math doesn't count all the crap that is flying up from miles BELOW the surface of the calderaDamn True said:My family and I drove from San Jose to Seattle in '80. The land was gray (ash covered) from waaaaaaaaaaay south of Portland clear past Tacoma.
Far more than 5mi in any direction.
I think I still have some pics my Dad and I took off the bridge that crosses the Toutle (sp?) river. The mud line was at least 30' up the trees on the bank of the river. There was a crapload of stuff coming down that river.
My ex-wife grew up in Astoria (at the mouth of the Colombia river) she had a photo of her and her brother standing next to a hunk of pumice on the beach that was at least 10' in dia.
A war on volcanoes.bomberz1qr20 said:Man, if this thing blows it will be disastrous for Bush's campaign. How will he explain letting this happen on his watch?
Simple: Iran gets bombed for their ties to terrorist geological events.
yeah, that finally makes sense.Damn True said:a) what's with the 'tude lately? My statement was hardly unreasonable.
b) interesting, I didn't know the following:
Although leaves of plants produce oxygen (O2) from CO2 during photosynthesis, their roots need to absorb O2 directly. The high CO2 concentrations in the soil on Mammoth Mountain are killing trees by denying their roots O2 and by interfering with nutrient uptake. In the areas of tree kill, CO2 makes up about 20 to 95% of the gas content of the soil; soil gas normally contains 1% or less CO2.
c) Ive spent quite a bit of time on Aviators O2 with no ill effects with no ill effect with no ill effects with no ill effects with no ill effects
yeah, like i said, volcano barf.Transcend said:These guys math doesn't count all the crap that is flying up from miles BELOW the surface of the caldera
Not really. What happens is that your rate of breathing somehow gets out of norm when you hyperventilate. When you are in a 100% oxygen enviroment, your body automatically meters your breathing. Astronauts have breathed in pure O2 for years with no ill effects (but the fire danger is way too extreme so it was stopped). So, when your body is no longer effectively metering your breathing and you hyperventillate, your body returns itself to whatever breathing rate is required based on the O2 concentration in the atmosphere.kidwoo said:No tude. I was just trying to make a point about too much of anything, even if biologically beneficial at certain quantities, can reach toxic levels.
would love to, but out of my budget for now. I've got a happy trigger finger.Transcend said:Zedro, volcano barf is cool. Paintball friday evening, wanna go?
Transcend said:Zedro, volcano barf is cool.
well, i dont feel so bad about not topping up my RRSPs....Transcend said:That yellowstone caldera would end life as we know it on this planet.
That's not PURE oxygen.Transcend said:JM is right, you can suck pure oxygen from a bottle and get light headed, or help power some oxygen into the blood to help recover. Football/Track/Soccer players do it all the time.
Look up the long valley caldera. That's mammoth. Makes yellowstone look itsy bitsy.Transcend said:That yellowstone caldera would end life as we know it on this planet.
Ya, I know. Either one would screw stuff up royally. Just pointin out the "super volcano" was actually big enough to kill us all.kidwoo said:Look up the long valley caldera. That's mammoth. Makes yellowstone look itsy bitsy.
you mean, from looking out from your backyard right?Transcend said:When it goes up, it's gonna be pretty spectacular.
When I did the continental divide tour, we went through an area called the "great divide basin". It's apparently the old caldera in the area that preceded yellowstone but from the same magma sink. We rode two days, 120 miles each, just across a big crater. While not an explosion, still kind of spooky to think of the area affected.Transcend said:Ya, I know. Either one would screw stuff up royally. Just pointin out the "super volcano" was actually big enough to kill us all.
The 3 sisters volcanos in Oregon are forming one huge super volcano too. When it goes up, it's gonna be pretty spectacular.
DAMN. Long trip.kidwoo said:From the long valley explosion, one of the guys I work with comes in every once in a while and shows me a rock and says "that's from mammoth" "Big deal" I think. The he tells me someone found it south america. eek.
There might be some other factors at work here, but for one I don't know if under your hypothesis, the apollo capsule would have been consumed by fire as it was (because they were breathing 100% O2).kidwoo said:JM. Apollonauts got the equivalent of a "trickle" of oxygen so that 1) they didn't have to carry extra weight and 2) the total mass of oxygen never exceeded what would normally be taken in the same amount of time with "normal" breathing. This is not the same thing as what athletes/patients/pilots get. They were not really breathing. I've seen reports on their whole setup. For it to succeed, these guys were nowhere near the atmospheric pressure of the planet.
.
Yeah and that's what they said last time. Soooooo many people died because the USGS didn't want wide spread panic. Oh well population controlTully said:I heard it should only affect those within a five-mile range, but that is obviously pretty hard to call.