so i found this video of the case of peter paul v. hillary, and after viewing it, i have some general & abstract questions for the voting public here.
when there comes a time that the dear voter is presented with a damning case which is clear, complete, and relevant, how can they continue support for a candidate, or how can a candidate have the gall to continue to run?
it seems to happen so frequently: there's publicity, the plaintiff is investigated & stuffed, there's hand-waving..............and then business as usual.
when there comes a time that the dear voter is presented with a damning case which is clear, complete, and relevant, how can they continue support for a candidate, or how can a candidate have the gall to continue to run?
it seems to happen so frequently: there's publicity, the plaintiff is investigated & stuffed, there's hand-waving..............and then business as usual.