Quantcast

Physics Q

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Bldr_DH, Sep 1, 2005.

  1. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    I just have question about a physics problem -- I just need to know how to solve it, not the actual answer. Here's the question:

    A stone is dropped from a sea cliff and the sound of it hitting the ocean is heard 3.4s after it's release. If the speed of sound is 340 m/s, how high is the cliff.

    Basically, I know the distance down, and the distance back up again are the same, and the the acceleration of the rock is -9.8m/s/s (gravity). I've tried setting the distances equal to each other, then plugging in the numbers to get the time it takes the sound to travel the distance, then multiply that number by 340m/s to get the distance, but alas that hasn't worked.

    I'm sort of at a loss as to what I should do... :help:
     
    #1 -   Sep 1, 2005

    Please register to disable this ad.

  2. SkaredShtles

    SkaredShtles I love NEWCASTLE and will ONLY drink NEWCASTLE!!!!

    Rep/Likes:
    253 / 2,012
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    46,903
    Location:
    In a van.... down by the river
    College is just hell, ain't it? ;)
     
    #2 -   Sep 1, 2005
  3. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    Ha, this is High School... AP class, so I guess close enough.
     
    #3 -   Sep 1, 2005
  4. SkaredShtles

    SkaredShtles I love NEWCASTLE and will ONLY drink NEWCASTLE!!!!

    Rep/Likes:
    253 / 2,012
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    46,903
    Location:
    In a van.... down by the river
    Damn.

    Crazy $hit for HS, there......... :think:
     
    #4 -   Sep 1, 2005
  5. HRDTLBRO

    HRDTLBRO Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    4 / 0
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,161
    Location:
    Apt. 421
    try d=1/2at^2..where d=distance, a=acceleration, and t= time.
    d=1/2(9.8)(3.4)^2=56.644 meters
     
    #5 -   Sep 1, 2005
  6. CrabJoe StretchPants

    CrabJoe StretchPants Reincarnated Crab Walking Head Spinning Bruce Dick

    Rep/Likes:
    89 / 421
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    11,763
    Location:
    Groton, MA
    the 340m/s is extra information, and isnt needed. use the displacement/acceleration relationship: d= v(inital)t + (1/2)at^2

    solve for d,
    v(initial)=0 (it was dropped not thrown)
    t=3.4s
    a=-9.8m/s/s

    you should get 56.644m
     
    #6 -   Sep 1, 2005
  7. CrabJoe StretchPants

    CrabJoe StretchPants Reincarnated Crab Walking Head Spinning Bruce Dick

    Rep/Likes:
    89 / 421
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    11,763
    Location:
    Groton, MA
    damnit beat me to it

    and m/s/s is the same as m/s^2
     
    #7 -   Sep 1, 2005
  8. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    Oh, ok, so since it's so fast I should essentially just ignore it for such a small distance... makes sense. That makes things easy... Thanks.
     
    #8 -   Sep 1, 2005
  9. ET_SoCal

    ET_SoCal Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2001
    Messages:
    398
    Location:
    C-Me Valley, CA
    #9 -   Sep 1, 2005
  10. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    Thanks for the link.
     
  11. JRB

    JRB Guest

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / N/A
    The answer is grapes.
     
  12. Potroast88

    Potroast88 YouTube Boy

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 4
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,837
    Location:
    Bomb City
    I was gonna guess that the answer was 6.
     
  13. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    hrm... apparently 56.644m isn't quite right, so I'm assuming they took into account the time it took for the sound to come back up, and removed it from the time it took to get down, thus the distance is smaller. The answer is 52, so you weren't far off, but I fear the teach will scrutinize for accuracy... What do you think? Any other options?
     
  14. bomberboy11

    bomberboy11 Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    665
    Location:
    At a computer...duh
    If they want the accuracy to be to 3 decimal places, chances are they want you to be factoring in the speed of sound as well. In that case it becomes a piece-wise function, using variables T_down and T_up (time it takes for the object to go down and hit the bottom and time it takes for the sound to come up back to the viewer) where T_down + T_up = 3.4 seconds. You will have functions d = (1/2)*a*(T_down)^2 = 340*T_up. From here, make the substituion T_up = 3.4 - T_down (you can isolate either time variable, but this makes it simpler because of the square in the acceleration function). Solve (1/2)*a*(T_down)^2 = 340*(3.4 - T_down) for T_down (this will likely have to be done on your calculator using either the graphing method of a binomial where it intersects 0 or just the quadratic formula - in either case, use the positive value), then plug that back into d = (1/2)*a*(T_down)^2 to get your distance. Hope this helps if it turns out that the speed of sound turns out not to be negligible.
     
  15. beestiboy

    beestiboy Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 0
    Joined:
    May 21, 2005
    Messages:
    321
    Location:
    Merded, ca
    Wow i forgot a lot of calc after 5 years since leaving college.

    so i guess they are discrediting any cross wind or off shore flow. They always simplify it to the point where it is no longer a practicle question.(j/k) The answer is who cares so long as you hear the splash and dont fall off the cliff.
     
  16. MMike

    MMike A fowl peckerwood.

    Rep/Likes:
    61 / 84
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2001
    Messages:
    18,261
    Location:
    just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
    That's algebra, not calculus......

    And bomberboy's method should get you what you need...
     
  17. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    Yep, it checked out... It's what I was doing, but I was substituting it differently -- made it more complicated and I ended up making a mistake with positive/negative signs somewhere. Thanks to those who helped 'n such.
     
  18. Reactor

    Reactor Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 1
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,978
    Location:
    Chandler, AZ, USA
    Wait until you get the bullet in the block problem... :evil:
     
  19. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    Uh oh. Sounds ominous...
     
  20. -dustin

    -dustin boring

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 1
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    7,166
    Location:
    austin
    what if you have vertigo? or are deaf?
     
  21. Bldr_DH

    Bldr_DH Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    768
    Location:
    NO BO CO
    Either a) You'll explode, or b) no one will give a crap if you heard it or not.