she quit racing for a while. this is her first WC since 2007 and she only did a few local races up until 2009. then she took another 2 years off until she decided to get back into training for WC racing last year.Is there any reason Tracy Hannah hasn't been sponsored the past few years? I think some teams sponsoring other girls really dropped the ball on not sponsoring her full time. Not only is she fast, but eh.... she's actually quite nice to look at.
i've read and heard nothing but how humble and sportsman like gwin is. i talked with him briefly at a fundraiser for a local WC racer and got the exact same impression, super nice guy who wants everyone to excel. he's super competitive but really seems to love racing no matter the outcome and wants everyone to do their best at any given race.Gwin seems to be a real sportsman. Giving props to Minnaar and Hannah and smiling is how it should be. A for that.
Minnaars friends cheering for him is just priceless.
Sounds like it had to do with the dropper post he was trying to run.Any word on why Graves didn't race the carbon 303 today???
She quit racing because it was too expensive from what she's said. Did Tracy Moseley, Sabrina Jonnier, or any of the other top women ever take a break from racing world cups because it was too expensive? She had some solid results 5 years ago when she was racing world cups. She was young and up-and-coming, but it seems strange that she didn't get picked up by any of the teams. I know this is easy to say since she just won a world cup, but to me, she is the obvious choice for any world cup team looking for a female rider. With proper training she would have been a threat to podium at every race since she had to quit 4 years ago. And this is just me being shallow, but in a sport mostly followed by men, it's naive to think that looks don't matter.she quit racing for a while. this is her first WC since 2007 and she only did a few local races up until 2009. then she took another 2 years off until she decided to get back into training for WC racing last year.
Because women's DH racing is not at all competitive?I asked me the same question. Actually she was working fulltime during the race season in Australia. How can that be? She's definitely one of the fastest girls on the cirquit...
No, it's not just you, they totally matter. Why do you think people talk more about Rachel Atherton than Tracey "the man" Mosley?And this is just me being shallow, but in a sport mostly followed by men, it's naive to think that looks don't matter.
wait, Minnar was running a semi slick front at 20psi, and a cut spike at 15psi?!?!? How did he not double flat on every single rock? Are these guys running special super thick casings? Super thick tubes? Liners between their tires and tubes?Incredible wrap up to the weekend via Sven Martin and Gary Perkin - http://www.vitalmtb.com/photos/features/2012-UCI-World-Cup-Pietermaritzburg-South-Africa-DOWNHILL-FINALS,3398/Slideshow,0/sspomer,2
did you read the caption on the photo, at all?wait, Minnar was running a semi slick front at 20psi, and a cut spike at 15psi?!?!? How did he not double flat on every single rock? Are these guys running special super thick casings? Super thick tubes? Liners between their tires and tubes?
Or is that claim total BS?
No, I was just listening.did you read the caption on the photo, at all?
At the time she needed to be picked up, she was very talented and coming a off a good season. But the economic turmoil at the time left everybody with tight purse strings. If I'm not wrong, it was the same season Kintner had to pull out and go privateer. The big names were signed by the big companies and the mid-level companies couldn't justify taking a chance on an up and comer.She quit racing because it was too expensive from what she's said. Did Tracy Moseley, Sabrina Jonnier, or any of the other top women ever take a break from racing world cups because it was too expensive? She had some solid results 5 years ago when she was racing world cups. She was young and up-and-coming, but it seems strange that she didn't get picked up by any of the teams. I know this is easy to say since she just won a world cup, but to me, she is the obvious choice for any world cup team looking for a female rider. With proper training she would have been a threat to podium at every race since she had to quit 4 years ago. And this is just me being shallow, but in a sport mostly followed by men, it's naive to think that looks don't matter.
Marshy strikes again!wait, Minnar was running a semi slick front at 20psi, and a cut spike at 15psi?!?!? How did he not double flat on every single rock? Are these guys running special super thick casings? Super thick tubes? Liners between their tires and tubes?
Or is that claim total BS?
I bet if you dig deeper you will find that many of the Pro men and women are somewhat "well funded" from birth (read rich families). They can put some of their own cash in to float the rough spots, or even help fund their own teams at times (Riffle?). DH doesn't have to pay the rent if you know what I mean. Sponsorship $ can be pretty minimal in the grand scheme of things, especially for the ladies. I bet Ms. Atherton (among others) has never had a real job in her life.She quit racing because it was too expensive from what she's said. Did Tracy Moseley, Sabrina Jonnier, or any of the other top women ever take a break from racing world cups because it was too expensive? She had some solid results 5 years ago when she was racing world cups. She was young and up-and-coming, but it seems strange that she didn't get picked up by any of the teams. I know this is easy to say since she just won a world cup, but to me, she is the obvious choice for any world cup team looking for a female rider. With proper training she would have been a threat to podium at every race since she had to quit 4 years ago. And this is just me being shallow, but in a sport mostly followed by men, it's naive to think that looks don't matter.
I am not so good at reading sarcasm, but holy cr@p I hope this was.I bet if you dig deeper you will find that many of the Pro men and women are somewhat "well funded" from birth (read rich families).
I don't think it was sarcasm, but it sure was stupid.I am not so good at reading sarcasm, but holy cr@p I hope this was.
I have never done an informal study, but, having been deeply involved with this sport for over 20 years, I can say I know no one that comes from a 'rich' family.
I won't speak for the WC pros but a looking at SOME local ones you can see how many can boost your training. Not that the non rich pros aren't doing wellI am not so good at reading sarcasm, but holy cr@p I hope this was.
I have never done an informal study, but, having been deeply involved with this sport for over 20 years, I can say I know no one that comes from a 'rich' family.
you realize he is as "inside" the industry as it gets right?stik - what woodbooger said is right. (just depends on your definition of rich) juvenile and Youth regional riders in our country have new £4k DH bikes (and no expense spared on the rest of their kit) and parents who spend a small fortune on taking their kids racing.. it's definitely no pikey sport anymore that's for sure.
http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=248929&p=3768088&viewfull=1#post3768088okay... so back to racing.... did anyone catch in one of the wrap-up videos (maybe it was the Vital slideshow) that Danny was running rear pressure as low as 15psi?!?! was the mechanic being sarcastic?! that seems unreal to me. not just for flats and dents but for ripping the tire off the rim under hard cornering...
did you read the caption on the photo, at all?
No, I was just listening.
Pretty sure Riffle is?I am not so good at reading sarcasm, but holy cr@p I hope this was.
I have never done an informal study, but, having been deeply involved with this sport for over 20 years, I can say I know no one that comes from a 'rich' family.
I donno man, I went to junior high with his little brother, they were wealthy enough as far as santa barbarians go, but nothing truly rich where money doesn't matter. maybe they've made some money since then though.Pretty sure Riffle is?
if by Danny, you mean Greg Minnnaaarr, then it was pretty obvious his mechanic was jokingokay... so back to racing.... did anyone catch in one of the wrap-up videos (maybe it was the Vital slideshow) that Danny was running rear pressure as low as 15psi?!?! was the mechanic being sarcastic?! that seems unreal to me. not just for flats and dents but for ripping the tire off the rim under hard cornering...
yes yes, I've already been made aware of my stupidity... was even up on this same page a little earlier... thanks for rubbing it in...if by Danny, you mean Greg Minnnaaarr, then it was pretty obvious his mechanic was joking
Okay the Red Bull stream was better for sure. My issue with it was they needed maybe 3-4 more cameras. Also the course was not rough by any stretch so it may have been cool to have cameras running on lines or rails. Not sure if that can be done with broadcasting but assume it can the NFL does it.edit: anyway...back to racing.
Super pumped to see if gwin can come back and take it. I think of all the courses, val di sol is his strongest, and its certainly rad from a spectators point of view - lots of gnar, lots of highspeed, and lots of room for people to gain and lose lots of time.
you're sarcasming, right? comparing the broadcasting of DH racing to the NFL?Okay the Red Bull stream was better for sure. My issue with it was they needed maybe 3-4 more cameras. Also the course was not rough by any stretch so it may have been cool to have cameras running on lines or rails. Not sure if that can be done with broadcasting but assume it can the NFL does it.
I think he's saying it didn't seem like 10 HD cameras on course. Not sure how many were active on the hill and being used during the race, but it seemed like 5-7 at most. Anybody bother to count live camera angles on course?you're sarcasming, right? comparing the broadcasting of DH racing to the NFL?
and this may just be me, but what is with people complaining about the number of cameras? red bull gave us a great quality FREE feed with 10 HD cameras as promised. are you not entertained?
They have 2 years as a "TAX WRITE" off correct? So this season and next. I can help them blow cash if they need suggestions.you're sarcasming, right? comparing the broadcasting of DH racing to the NFL?
and this may just be me, but what is with people complaining about the number of cameras? red bull gave us a great quality FREE feed with 10 HD cameras as promised. are you not entertained?
Yes, Butch, there has been actual counting. 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10I think he's saying it didn't seem like 10 HD cameras on course. Not sure how many were active on the hill and being used during the race, but it seemed like 5-7 at most. Anybody bother to count live camera angles on course?
Okay the Red Bull stream was better for sure. My issue with it was they needed maybe 3-4 more cameras. Also the course was not rough by any stretch so it may have been cool to have cameras running on lines or rails. Not sure if that can be done with broadcasting but assume it can the NFL does it.