So Im an x dh'er who just got back into mtb.. riding "enduro"..
Been riding a Giant Reign XO which I like...can pin the descents and it gets me to the top...for 75% of the trails I ride the 160mm is more than welcome as its really rough and rocky..
those same trails are also the kind you ride to the top then ride down..no up and down xc type riding...the mnts go from sea level to 3k'...
The Reign climbs good but it requires lowering the Talas equipped Fox 36 and flipping the Propedal knob..
one of the climbs I do have some square edges..pretty gnarly stuff where the bike definitely likes to get hung up but that trail is the minority as most are fairly mellow fire roads or pavement climbs..usually about 8miles up and slightly less down..
sometimes I like to link up a few trails and spend a good 4-5hrs in the saddle climbing about 5500' of vertical and descending about the same..
Ive been totally content with the Reign until recently when Kona's new Process 111 caught my eye..my local shop got one in and I gotta say the things badass...super low and slack..it manuals good and feels flickable...
I've been trying to resist the urge to get a second 29er trailbike with less travel for the other 25% of trails I ride that the 160mm Reign is overkill on..
also the idea of not having to lower the fork between climbing and descending also appeals to me..it would make some trails that do have climbs midway more fun and not fumbling for the propedal knob and talas would help my strava times lol...
less travel with bigger wheels seems like it would make sense..
If $ wasnt an issue I would slap down the 3700$ for the process 111 right now and be happy with two bikes but thats not the case..basically the kona is out of my price range so I would have to build something up from a used frame..
found a few Trance X 29ers for a reasonable price...the fact that its basically the same as the Reign makes sense as it would be easier to switch between the two but at 5" of travel is it going to even be much different??
the Reign in 31.5lbs +/- Could prob get the Trance between 27-29lbs without breaking the bank...Im basically going to have to sell some crap to build one so I want to make sure I'm not going to be building two of the same bike..one with bigger wheels that dosnt turn as good...
Im just not sure the Trance 29er is going to have the same fun, flickable feel that the Process would and would it be that much better than the Reign for all day epics or smoother trails???
I really shouldnt build another bike but for some reason I cant get the thought out of my head..please talk me out of it..especially since i thought I would be 26" for life..I gotta say that Process got me second guessing that though..
Been riding a Giant Reign XO which I like...can pin the descents and it gets me to the top...for 75% of the trails I ride the 160mm is more than welcome as its really rough and rocky..
those same trails are also the kind you ride to the top then ride down..no up and down xc type riding...the mnts go from sea level to 3k'...
The Reign climbs good but it requires lowering the Talas equipped Fox 36 and flipping the Propedal knob..
one of the climbs I do have some square edges..pretty gnarly stuff where the bike definitely likes to get hung up but that trail is the minority as most are fairly mellow fire roads or pavement climbs..usually about 8miles up and slightly less down..
sometimes I like to link up a few trails and spend a good 4-5hrs in the saddle climbing about 5500' of vertical and descending about the same..
Ive been totally content with the Reign until recently when Kona's new Process 111 caught my eye..my local shop got one in and I gotta say the things badass...super low and slack..it manuals good and feels flickable...
I've been trying to resist the urge to get a second 29er trailbike with less travel for the other 25% of trails I ride that the 160mm Reign is overkill on..
also the idea of not having to lower the fork between climbing and descending also appeals to me..it would make some trails that do have climbs midway more fun and not fumbling for the propedal knob and talas would help my strava times lol...
less travel with bigger wheels seems like it would make sense..
If $ wasnt an issue I would slap down the 3700$ for the process 111 right now and be happy with two bikes but thats not the case..basically the kona is out of my price range so I would have to build something up from a used frame..
found a few Trance X 29ers for a reasonable price...the fact that its basically the same as the Reign makes sense as it would be easier to switch between the two but at 5" of travel is it going to even be much different??
the Reign in 31.5lbs +/- Could prob get the Trance between 27-29lbs without breaking the bank...Im basically going to have to sell some crap to build one so I want to make sure I'm not going to be building two of the same bike..one with bigger wheels that dosnt turn as good...
Im just not sure the Trance 29er is going to have the same fun, flickable feel that the Process would and would it be that much better than the Reign for all day epics or smoother trails???
I really shouldnt build another bike but for some reason I cant get the thought out of my head..please talk me out of it..especially since i thought I would be 26" for life..I gotta say that Process got me second guessing that though..
Last edited: